[quote]canada wrote:
Is it just me but that chic looks like Bella Donna?[/quote]
That girl looks like she was given ten bucks to pretend to be interested in that guy.
[quote]canada wrote:
Is it just me but that chic looks like Bella Donna?[/quote]
That girl looks like she was given ten bucks to pretend to be interested in that guy.
[quote]scoot823 wrote:
WTF!?[/quote]
One strap only on the overalls provides a more Dexies Midnite Runner-like approach with his partner, Eileen.
Excuse me I have to barf.
These people are wasting my oxygen.
I wonder what they see when they look in the mirror.
That doesn’t even closely resemble muscle in any way. I couldn’t imagine trying to take one of these guys seriously.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I wonder what they see when they look in the mirror.[/quote]
Good point, I bet they think they looked jacked. I wonder what people without anyknowledge of bodybuilding/lifting think?
Unfortunately, I think a lot of people who don’t have a clue about bodybuilding think those guys are the strong ones…
why gawd why? can someone explain to me what this synthol does, i really don’t wanna google something as stupid as this
[quote]That One Guy wrote:
why gawd why? can someone explain to me what this synthol does, i really don’t wanna google something as stupid as this[/quote]
oil that stays in your muscles for up to 3 years if I understand correctly
yeah, Freaks about sums it all up.
brainless fucking freaks, that want what they arent and wont put in the the sweat equity for.
[quote]IHateGymMorons wrote:
<<< That young guy with the hat needs to get beat up.[/quote]
I volunteer
[quote]ianhambrecht wrote:
That doesn’t even closely resemble muscle in any way. I couldn’t imagine trying to take one of these guys seriously.[/quote]
They really do look like giant tumors. What exactly is the chemical synthol? I heard a rumor it was motor oil.
i read somewhere that its purified sesame oil and some novocaine or lidocaine.
ideal for intra-muscular usage by my books.
Absurd yes - but to me, no more so than 300,000 women a year having their chests cut open and bags of goo implanted to make them more buxom. Reconstructive surgery excepted.
[quote]treco wrote:
Absurd yes - but to me, no more so than 300,000 women a year having their chests cut open and bags of goo implanted to make them more buxom. Reconstructive surgery excepted.[/quote]
The difference? Big breasts are favored in some parts of society. They help strippers earn several times the income they were previously making. They are also shaped to look fairly natural even if they don’t “move” that way. That is a fairly large difference from having muscles that look like tumors or massive infections.
I can’t believe so many people have gotten that done. You can almost always tell when it has been used, especially if you knew the person previously. You can’t always tell breast implants if they have been kept conservative and natural looking.
[quote]treco wrote:
Absurd yes - but to me, no more so than 300,000 women a year having their chests cut open and bags of goo implanted to make them more buxom. Reconstructive surgery excepted.[/quote]
What I wonder is … There are plenty of woman running around with natural looking boob jobs.
So if these guys are the equivalent of the girls with the over the top super sized boob job … How many men are there out there with natural looking synthol jobs???
Cheers
Spaceman
[quote]treco wrote:
Absurd yes - but to me, no more so than 300,000 women a year having their chests cut open and bags of goo implanted to make them more buxom. Reconstructive surgery excepted.[/quote]
What I wonder is … There are plenty of woman running around with natural looking boob jobs.
So if these guys are the equivalent of the girls with the over the top super sized boob job … How many men are there out there with natural looking synthol jobs???
Cheers
Spaceman
[quote]NZSpaceman wrote:
treco wrote:
Absurd yes - but to me, no more so than 300,000 women a year having their chests cut open and bags of goo implanted to make them more buxom. Reconstructive surgery excepted.
What I wonder is … There are plenty of woman running around with natural looking boob jobs.
So if these guys are the equivalent of the girls with the over the top super sized boob job … How many men are there out there with natural looking synthol jobs???
Cheers
Spaceman[/quote]
It doesn’t seem to ever look “natural”. When Flex Wheeler used it in his posterior delts one year you still tell even though he managed to balance it out fairly well. It just didn’t look right, especially on someone we had seen for years.
It looks like fake muscle to anyone who pays attention to things like that. It might fool those who have never seen many bodybuilders before.
[quote]NZSpaceman wrote:
treco wrote:
Absurd yes - but to me, no more so than 300,000 women a year having their chests cut open and bags of goo implanted to make them more buxom. Reconstructive surgery excepted.
What I wonder is … There are plenty of woman running around with natural looking boob jobs.
So if these guys are the equivalent of the girls with the over the top super sized boob job … How many men are there out there with natural looking synthol jobs???
Cheers
Spaceman[/quote]
I’m not sure if the two correlate real closely. In a boob job there is silicone or saline in packets and put in the body. My understanding is that this synthol is just injected directly into the arm. I would hope there are not a lot of doctors doing that.
So I would think most of these guys are doing it to themselves. I think the majority of women getting breast enhancements are getting some sort of professional advise before getting the procedure done.