More Proof Muslims Are Nuts!

[quote]lucasa wrote:
Lorisco wrote:

Let me get this straight, Muslims wanting to kill some guy because he publishes naked pictures is not nutty? Hello!

Apparently you haven’t driven in any major US cities or been to any children’s soccer matches lately. In this country people actually kill people for nutty things that aren’t even against the law everyday.

And just like in this country, scream as loud as they want, those 150 or so people who want him executed will have to go disappointed because the law doesn’t reach that far in Indonesia.[/quote]

Right, and it is crazy here as well. Crazy is crazy. However, crazy for a religions sake is much more deep-seated and divisive than some overly protective parent at a kids soccer match knocking down another kid. They are not out to kill all kids, just the one that kicked their little Johnny. On the other hand, many Muslims as a matter of faith feel it necessary to kill anyone who isn’t Muslim.

However, until the rational Muslim leaders stand up and openly denounce their fellow Muslims who are committing violence around the world, ALL Muslims will be considered crazy killers!

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:

Here’s the irony: You are attempting to make a “proof” that “Muslims are nuts” yet fail to realize the subject you teach was practically invented by them. Hilarious![/quote]

What they invented does not prove they are nuts, their own murderous irrational bloodthirsty behavior is what proves they are nuts.

[quote]lixy wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Beyond ludicrous…how many colonial powers let the ‘conquered’ people hold their own elections?

And if its a colony, then doesn’t that mean that we want some of our citizens to move there, to ‘colonize’? Yeah…I want to move to Iraq…LMAO!

Is all of this similar to a lawsuit I heard about…a guy pulled a woman from a burning building and she sued him — he didn’t rescue her fast enough.

Most Americans think oil was a factor in your invasion of Iraq.

90%+ of Iraqis say the reason you went to Iraq is to control their oil. The majority of the world population thinks the same thing. You can’t possibly dismiss all these opinions and keep thinking inside your bubble.[/quote]

Quit listening to Taliban Radio! :wink:

A recent poll found that Iraqis want us to stay by more than a 2 to 1 margin. I’ll hunt it down.

Last time I checked, we haven’t stolen any Iraqi oil and what the shiteater terrorists don’t blow up, they’re getting $60/barrel. Yeah, some exploitation.

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Do you even know what cardinality is? Or the cardinality of the Naturals (if you know what cardinality is)? What is a MacLaurin Series? What’s an Improper Integral?

Happy Googling!!

Are you kidding me? You are challenging someone’s knowledge when they are sitting behind one of the greatest (and worst) information tools ever invented. If you had taken the time to understand the flaw in your argument you could have avoided this silly challenge.

Here’s the irony: You are attempting to make a “proof” that “Muslims are nuts” yet fail to realize the subject you teach was practically invented by them. Hilarious![/quote]

Yeah, Al-Kwarizmi did write the first Algebra book, in 825 AD. It then proceeded to gather dust. Along comes Newton, Leibniz, Fermat, the Bernouillies, Euler, Gauss, Reimann, on and on…yep, they are Muslims alright.

And Fibonacci translated the Al-gabr into Latin…and he’s Muslim too.

Viete invented the variable…he’s Muslim too.

I know you both are just trolling. Carry on.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Yeah, Al-Kwarizmi did write the first Algebra book, in 825 AD. It then proceeded to gather dust. Along comes Newton, Leibniz, Fermat, the Bernouillies, Euler, Gauss, Reimann, on and on…yep, they are Muslims alright.

[/quote]
Well, maybe not, you still look silly.

And those Europeans who did many great things for modern mathematics owe it all to the Middle East. Sounds like a bunch of nuts-o Muslims to me.

By the way, they did not just develop Algebra but the whole concept of what Algebra represents…operations, groups, rings, fields. They barrowed from Euclidean geometry to develop and generalize it. Without geometry or algebra no other mathematics could have been developed outside of number theory (also accredited to the Greeks).

[quote]Lorisco wrote:
What they invented does not prove they are nuts, their own murderous irrational bloodthirsty behavior is what proves they are nuts.[/quote]

Hate-filled posts are sad.

Your discourse is no different than the one held by Ben-Laden and his extremist buddies; All of you stopped reasoning with your brains and adopted a cramped radical position.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Quit listening to Taliban Radio! ;)[/quote]

Actually, the only radio I tune to is Radio Paradise. It’s really worth checking out. It’s a DJ based in Paradise, CA with seriously super taste. Give it a try, you won’t regret it.

If such a poll really existed, it would mean that Iraqis want Americans to stay for the sole reason of hunting them down. I don’t think it’s very plausible.

Here’s the latest poll to date results:
The number of Iraqis who approve of attacks on coalition troops has risen from 17% in a similar survey three years ago to 51% now.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6454251.stm

The only ones benefiting from the war are corporations. Everybody else loose; If not their lives or money, their souls. For you or any other tax-payer, there’s clearly no benefit. That’s the reason they got you scared with the WMD deal.

The thousands of “security contractors” paid for by tax dollars. The juicy “reconstruction” contracts laid out to Halliburton. The new oil law that opens up the market for US companies to exploit the oil has been drafted in Washington and is agressively pushed through the Iraqi parliament. All of these end up in the pockets of people that already have money pouring out of their ears. But all these are nothing but bonuses.

However, the primary reason the US is in Iraq is control of the resources. It’s the second biggest reserve of oil in the world for Christ’s sake. A few months ago, Dick Cheney said that control over oil pipelines can be “tools for intimidation and blackmail”. He was refering to the Iraqi resistance and to the Al-Qaeda terrorists. What he didn’t say was that the same thing can be achieved in American hands but on a global level. That’s the REAL reason.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Yeah, Al-Kwarizmi did write the first Algebra book, in 825 AD. It then proceeded to gather dust. Along comes Newton, Leibniz, Fermat, the Bernouillies, Euler, Gauss, Reimann, on and on…yep, they are Muslims alright.

And Fibonacci translated the Al-gabr into Latin…and he’s Muslim too.

Viete invented the variable…he’s Muslim too.
[/quote]

Great advancements were made by Muslims. Denying that makes you indeed sound silly (even for you!).

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Yeah, Al-Kwarizmi did write the first Algebra book, in 825 AD. It then proceeded to gather dust. Along comes Newton, Leibniz, Fermat, the Bernouillies, Euler, Gauss, Reimann, on and on…yep, they are Muslims alright.

Well, maybe not, you still look silly.

And those Europeans who did many great things for modern mathematics owe it all to the Middle East. Sounds like a bunch of nuts-o Muslims to me.

By the way, they did not just develop Algebra but the whole concept of what Algebra represents…operations, groups, rings, fields. They barrowed from Euclidean geometry to develop and generalize it. Without geometry or algebra no other mathematics could have been developed outside of number theory (also accredited to the Greeks).[/quote]

Once again, laughable. Why did the Muslim countries not develop mathematics as Europeans later did? As an example, an Emir Of Baghdad burned all the books he could get hold of: “If it’s not about Allah, then its superflous!” That’s a prime example of Islamic mindset.

If your culture is not accepting of mathematics, logic, or reason, then that society is not mathematical, logical, or rational.

No one would deny that there are sparks of rationality in a Muslim country. These folks are quickly snuffed out. When you have to flee into the desert carrying your math books, because some shit-for-brains lunatic wants to burn them, you know that you are NOT living in a rational society.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
A recent poll found that Iraqis want us to stay by more than a 2 to 1 margin. I’ll hunt it down.
[/quote]

By all means do. MeaA new poll of Iraqis commissioned by USA Today has found that 83% of Shiites and 97% of Sunni Arabs oppose the presence of coalition forces in Iraq. By a margin of more than 3 to 1, Iraqis say the presence of U.S. forces is making the security situation worse.

Seems to concur with the latest from the BBC.

I’ll be expecting your “recent” poll.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Yeah, Al-Kwarizmi did write the first Algebra book, in 825 AD. It then proceeded to gather dust. Along comes Newton, Leibniz, Fermat, the Bernouillies, Euler, Gauss, Reimann, on and on…yep, they are Muslims alright.

Well, maybe not, you still look silly.

And those Europeans who did many great things for modern mathematics owe it all to the Middle East. Sounds like a bunch of nuts-o Muslims to me.

By the way, they did not just develop Algebra but the whole concept of what Algebra represents…operations, groups, rings, fields. They barrowed from Euclidean geometry to develop and generalize it. Without geometry or algebra no other mathematics could have been developed outside of number theory (also accredited to the Greeks).

Once again, laughable. Why did the Muslim countries not develop mathematics as Europeans later did? As an example, an Emir Of Baghdad burned all the books he could get hold of: “If it’s not about Allah, then its superflous!” That’s a prime example of Islamic mindset.

If your culture is not accepting of mathematics, logic, or reason, then that society is not mathematical, logical, or rational.

No one would deny that there are sparks of rationality in a Muslim country. These folks are quickly snuffed out. When you have to flee into the desert carrying your math books, because some shit-for-brains lunatic wants to burn them, you know that you are NOT living in a rational society.

[/quote]

Your biased bigotism overrides any presence of a neutral learning stance in your brain. Do some research with an open mind.

The current numbers you use are based on old Arabic numbers, Islamic culture was responsible, either directly or indirectly, for the development of algebra, geometry, medicine and the science of hygeine, among other things like improved irrigation and ventilation systems for large buildings. Islamic cities were some of the first to have a proper sewage system and the building of rounded arches and domes.

Plus Kabbalah and most esoteric Jewish and Islamic philosophies were cultivated in and around Cordoba and Al-Andalus, centers of Islamic learning and knowledge, to which many European scholars flocked.

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Yeah, Al-Kwarizmi did write the first Algebra book, in 825 AD. It then proceeded to gather dust. Along comes Newton, Leibniz, Fermat, the Bernouillies, Euler, Gauss, Reimann, on and on…yep, they are Muslims alright.

Well, maybe not, you still look silly.

And those Europeans who did many great things for modern mathematics owe it all to the Middle East. Sounds like a bunch of nuts-o Muslims to me.

By the way, they did not just develop Algebra but the whole concept of what Algebra represents…operations, groups, rings, fields. They barrowed from Euclidean geometry to develop and generalize it. Without geometry or algebra no other mathematics could have been developed outside of number theory (also accredited to the Greeks).

Once again, laughable. Why did the Muslim countries not develop mathematics as Europeans later did? As an example, an Emir Of Baghdad burned all the books he could get hold of: “If it’s not about Allah, then its superflous!” That’s a prime example of Islamic mindset.

If your culture is not accepting of mathematics, logic, or reason, then that society is not mathematical, logical, or rational.

No one would deny that there are sparks of rationality in a Muslim country. These folks are quickly snuffed out. When you have to flee into the desert carrying your math books, because some shit-for-brains lunatic wants to burn them, you know that you are NOT living in a rational society.

[/quote]

What do BAC’s know of rationalism?

[quote]lixy wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
What they invented does not prove they are nuts, their own murderous irrational bloodthirsty behavior is what proves they are nuts.

Hate-filled posts are sad.

Your discourse is no different than the one held by Ben-Laden and his extremist buddies; All of you stopped reasoning with your brains and adopted a cramped radical position.[/quote]

And once again you support a group of individuals who are bend on murder and destruction and you wonder why people say you support terrorism. Get a clue!

[quote]Lorisco wrote:
lixy wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
What they invented does not prove they are nuts, their own murderous irrational bloodthirsty behavior is what proves they are nuts.

Hate-filled posts are sad.

Your discourse is no different than the one held by Ben-Laden and his extremist buddies; All of you stopped reasoning with your brains and adopted a cramped radical position.

And once again you support a group of individuals who are bend on murder and destruction and you wonder why people say you support terrorism. Get a clue!

[/quote]

Once again you blame an entire people for the actions of a politically motivated handful, and refuse to learn more about them while considering yourself enlightened, and you wonder why people say you’re arrogant and closed-minded. Get a clue!

[quote]Lorisco wrote:
And once again you support a group of individuals who are bend on murder and destruction and you wonder why people say you support terrorism. Get a clue! [/quote]

I never said such thing. I dare you for the nth time to prove anything of the sort. Until then, it’s slander.

[quote]Shoebolt wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
lixy wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
What they invented does not prove they are nuts, their own murderous irrational bloodthirsty behavior is what proves they are nuts.

Hate-filled posts are sad.

Your discourse is no different than the one held by Ben-Laden and his extremist buddies; All of you stopped reasoning with your brains and adopted a cramped radical position.

And once again you support a group of individuals who are bend on murder and destruction and you wonder why people say you support terrorism. Get a clue!

Once again you blame an entire people for the actions of a politically motivated handful, and refuse to learn more about them while considering yourself enlightened, and you wonder why people say you’re arrogant and closed-minded. Get a clue!
[/quote]

Blaming an entire people is valid when those people NEVER stand up and denounce the criminal behavior of the few. What they allow they condone!

And until you realize that quiet acceptance is just the same as those doing the bombing, you will also remain clueless.

[quote]lixy wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
And once again you support a group of individuals who are bend on murder and destruction and you wonder why people say you support terrorism. Get a clue!

I never said such thing. I dare you for the nth time to prove anything of the sort. Until then, it’s slander.[/quote]

“Your discourse is no different than the one held by Ben-Laden and his extremist buddies; All of you stopped reasoning with your brains and adopted a cramped radical position.”

My discourse blames Muslims for the violence and those Muslims who do not stand up against the violence as just as responsible. And if you disagree with this you obviously continue to support the Muslims culture of violence, as that is what it is.

[quote]Lorisco wrote:
lixy wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
And once again you support a group of individuals who are bend on murder and destruction and you wonder why people say you support terrorism. Get a clue!

I never said such thing. I dare you for the nth time to prove anything of the sort. Until then, it’s slander.

“Your discourse is no different than the one held by Ben-Laden and his extremist buddies; All of you stopped reasoning with your brains and adopted a cramped radical position.”

My discourse blames Muslims for the violence and those Muslims who do not stand up against the violence as just as responsible. And if you disagree with this you obviously continue to support the Muslims culture of violence, as that is what it is.

[/quote]

A conclusion that is another than yours is not inevitably the opposite. There could be a myriad of reasons why a common muslim wont oppose those actions that are deplorable for you. It could be a totally novel question for them. It could have something to do with your country’s past actions in the region. It could be something with their discontentment with their job or current apartment. They dont necessarily think about you or your familys struggles.

[quote]lixy wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
And once again you support a group of individuals who are bend on murder and destruction and you wonder why people say you support terrorism. Get a clue!

I never said such thing. I dare you for the nth time to prove anything of the sort. Until then, it’s slander.[/quote]

Slander? On an internet forum? Is this some sort of Sharia Law for the web? You are adding fuel to my argument that Muslims have a mindset and worldview that most westerners would regard as … nuts. Wait, let’s make it Nuts, with a capital N!!

[quote]karva wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
lixy wrote:
Lorisco wrote:
And once again you support a group of individuals who are bend on murder and destruction and you wonder why people say you support terrorism. Get a clue!

I never said such thing. I dare you for the nth time to prove anything of the sort. Until then, it’s slander.

“Your discourse is no different than the one held by Ben-Laden and his extremist buddies; All of you stopped reasoning with your brains and adopted a cramped radical position.”

My discourse blames Muslims for the violence and those Muslims who do not stand up against the violence as just as responsible. And if you disagree with this you obviously continue to support the Muslims culture of violence, as that is what it is.

A conclusion that is another than yours is not inevitably the opposite. There could be a myriad of reasons why a common muslim wont oppose those actions that are deplorable for you. It could be a totally novel question for them. It could have something to do with your country’s past actions in the region. It could be something with their discontentment with their job or current apartment. They dont necessarily think about you or your familys struggles.[/quote]

Most all those reasons you listed would be good rationale for continuing to blame all Muslims for the violence of a few. And maybe you are right and most don’t care and that is also a good reason for the US to not care that they are being singled out as evil.

You dorks from other “neutral” countries feel so smug in blaming the US for the actions of Muslims because you have never taken a stand for anything in your entire pathetic existence. I guess that is because your countries are of little value, or have nothing of value that anyone else might want. But if they ever did it is likely that you would be easy pickens for any country that had a pair! And then you would come crying to the US, like the rest of the world, to save you.