Hence I once created a thread on cyborgs.
Never ends!
You do know who is covered under the heading of Indo-European? The Indo should be a hint.
And here we have an example of your grudge. You ignore his insult directed at me, which was unprovoked; I donāt even know who this joker is. Are you that desperate for a friend?
Aboriginal Europeans. I donāt know what Prefix or word you like: abo-, Indo-, native. Choose how you like. Anyway, back to incels⦠the OP.
The more the merrier.
You donāt need to tell me what Caucasian is, I know damn well what a Caucasian is.
If caucasian fighter Badr Hari (Moroccan Dutch) assaults the typical American white guy, you know as well as I do that the victim will describe him as brown / middle eastern to the Police.
You know it, stop being dishonest. Also, what do you know about me to say Iām not educated and to tell me to read a book?
You must think youāre the only one who reads or is educated around here. Based on what you have been writing so far, you need to read a lot of books, but even that will not hel you that much.
You have other issues that books alone will not solve.
Anyway, as a newbie to the thread, any commentary on inceldom?
It refers to India, the subcontinent.
He usually gives preemptive conditions on what are new posters or those with opposing views. Eg: if you are ______ to think/believe _____, then you are a jerk/moron/imbecile/named Chico/loser/POS/a-hole and-or need to read books and get educated, particularly gain education in history.
Not in the context I used it.
I know that, man, but the guy is acting like an authority on whoās white and whoās not white, when even whites like the Irish, Italians, Spaniards, etc have been/are consideren not white /less white by whites of nordic / germanic / anglo saxonic descent.
And those guys are going to say that the typical guy from Algeria is white? He knows most wonāt, but he will argue otherwise.
Personally I think people care too much about who is white and who isnāt. This isnāt prison, who gives a shit?
And that means something to the actual definition? If someone calls some Chinese who actually is Japanese, does that mean he should really be considered Chinese?
Well you just proved it to me with this post. If you were an adult, you would have apologized or at the very least acknowledged we were referring to different definitions, no harm, no foul. Instead, when you were corrected by me, you didnāt choose the adult option but decided to continue with a point I have already dismissed as irrelevant.
Yeah, well, thatās just like your opinion man.
Because I wrote the dictionary. Grow up, kid.
If you read my posts you would have noted I donāt even believe in there being more than one human race. However, if I must use those classifications, I will use dictionary terms, not WASP or whatever terms.
There is no your context when using a term that has an actual definition. If this were possible then humans would never be able to communicate clearly. This is like that millennial SJW crap where they refer to ātheir truth.ā No, thatās called an opinion or judgment.
Indo-European is an actual word. If you donāt prefer it, thatās OK.
And it is you who believes there is only one race of mankind yet collectively judge a segment of it, Nordic people, the ones you call cave-shitters.
Anyway, back to the OP topic.
Yeah, and Indo refers to India, not native or aboriginal. You can Google the circumstances that led to that term being invented (hint: it was during a trip to India).
I explained that to you but you will ignore it because you are a man-child with a chip on your shoulder. Anyway, we all descend from cave shitters.
Caucasian is not the same as white. Caucasians can be white, but not necessarily. But you know this.
HAHAHAHAHA! Youāve been here arguing like a stubborn child, saying shit you know itās not even true, yet Iām not an adult? I appreciate your troll skills.
Stop condescendinā , son.
You been doing this for too long like a petulant know it all who knows jack shit.
Quit telling nonsense, boy.
THIS!
