MLB Thread: 2013

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

Well it depends, is the game in April or September?? If it’s in Sept. and my team is down 2 games on the division leader with 5 games to go, I’m using my closer for the 8th and ninth in that situation. If it’s in April i’m saving him for the ninth.
[/quote]

Why does your game plan change in April vs September?

Is using your closer in the 8th prove to be a more effective strategy in April vs September?[/quote]

Why did the Brewers pitch Sabbathia on short rest numerous times in Sept vs April in 08? Why did the D-back bring in Randy Johnson to pitch in releif in the 01 series? Why do the Yankees tend to use Rivera for 2 inning save more in October than any other time?

IMO the game does change later in the season from a marathon to a sprint.

Ofcoarse, Lanky would just say “don’t put yourself in position to use Randy Johnson in relief in the first place.” haha

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:

Well it depends, is the game in April or September?? If it’s in Sept. and my team is down 2 games on the division leader with 5 games to go, I’m using my closer for the 8th and ninth in that situation. If it’s in April i’m saving him for the ninth.
[/quote]

Why does your game plan change in April vs September?

Is using your closer in the 8th prove to be a more effective strategy in April vs September?[/quote]

Why did the Brewers pitch Sabbathia on short rest numerous times in Sept vs April in 08? Why did the D-back bring in Randy Johnson to pitch in releif in the 01 series? Why do the Yankees tend to use Rivera for 2 inning save more in October than any other time?

IMO the game does change later in the season from a marathon to a sprint.

Ofcoarse, Lanky would just say “don’t put yourself in position to use Randy Johnson in relief in the first place.” haha[/quote]

Well, yeah. When time is running out teams will go to extremes to try to win games. The risk in doing that earlier in the season makes it more likely that your pitcher will burn out, and you’ll need that pitcher all season. Towards the end of the year, it doesn’t even matter if your pitcher is at risk of burning out considering your season may be over if he doesn’t pitch.

This doesn’t make the games in September more important, it just means teams are more desperate.

But the fact remains, as you so eloquently stated, win those games in April and you don’t need to go to extremes later in the season. :slight_smile:


Had it not been for Miggy’s 3 inch vertical, the Jays would have not rallied to score 7 runs and win the game.

The Ricketts continue to battle with the city of Chicago over renovations to Wrigley and the surrounding area…then this happens:

DB - care to comment on Zito’s miraculous comeback? I know you’ve been outspoken about him in the past…

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
DB - care to comment on Zito’s miraculous comeback? I know you’ve been outspoken about him in the past…[/quote]

I don’t know what to say. He’s one of the many examples of a pitcher who lost significant velocity on his fastball and made the adjustment. Of course, it took him almost the entirety of his contract to figure it out, but better late than never.

The thing with him was that he never had great control to begin with. Back when he was with the A’s he wasn’t a hard thrower by any means, but he did throw harder than he does now. His arm speed was better, so not only was his fastball more like 88-89 on a regular basis, but the better arm speed allowed him to spin the curveball out of his hand much more sharply, and the break was later and sharper as a result, even if the speed was essentially the same as it is now.

He didn’t throw much of a changeup and I don’t think he really threw anything else back then, either. So, not only did he have to learn how to command what he DID feature (which was diminished in effectiveness), he had to learn some new pitches as well. It’s one thing to learn how to survive with what you already know how to throw. It’s another thing entirely to make that adjustment on the fly while ALSO learning new pitches. Lincecum needs to make the same multi-adjustment change in his game.

Now Zito throws a little cutter, a changeup, he can sink the fastball a bit and he still has an above average curve. If you can throw that repertoire of pitches for quality strikes, you can succeed in the majors regardless of how fast the fastball is. He’s learned how to throw all of those pitches for strikes now and he’s figured out how to differentiate the speed between each of them.

The 4-seam fastball tops out at about 86 now, but he’s more like 84-85 with that. The cutter he throws is about 80-82, the changeup is about 75-76, and the curve still drops in at about 70. That’s enough of a difference in speed from pitch to pitch to be effective. It doesn’t hurt that he can change speeds pretty decently with his curve. I’ve seen him throw it anywhere from 75 to about 68 in the same start.

If he makes a mistake out over the plate, he still is going to get pounded, but now hitters are starting to miss those mistakes every once in a while because they have more pitches to respect and they don’t necessarily just sit on one speed anymore. Before, he really only had two speeds that a hitter had to respect (fastball and curve), and they were going to get one of the two at least once in an at-bat. So they just sat on one speed and since he didn’t have good control, when they got what they were looking for it was typically in a location that they could really do something with.

Also, he’s starting to pitch inside more effectively, which is key for any pitcher. He can soft ball a guy down and away with several different movements and speeds and then spot that 85mph fastball at the belt inside and it looks much quicker as a result.

So yeah, I don’t know what to say about it.

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
DB - care to comment on Zito’s miraculous comeback? I know you’ve been outspoken about him in the past…[/quote]

After 14IP you’re declaring it a miraculous comeback? Really?

I bet by mid June he’ll be his usual shitbag self.

Sample size is a thing.

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
DB - care to comment on Zito’s miraculous comeback? I know you’ve been outspoken about him in the past…[/quote]

After 14IP you’re declaring it a miraculous comeback? Really?

I bet by mid June he’ll be his usual shitbag self.

Sample size is a thing.[/quote]

Obviously you don’t know what you’re talking about and didn’t watch the postseason last year. The Giants have won 16 straight games with Zito on the mound.

His last ten starts, including the postseason? 9-0 with a 1.63 ERA. That includes starts against two of the best lineups in the NL in Cincy and S. Louis.

I enjoyed this gamereax.com is for sale | HugeDomains

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
DB - care to comment on Zito’s miraculous comeback? I know you’ve been outspoken about him in the past…[/quote]

After 14IP you’re declaring it a miraculous comeback? Really?

I bet by mid June he’ll be his usual shitbag self.

Sample size is a thing.[/quote]

I’ll bet you another month of avatars that Zito ends up with a better ERA than Dickey.

Actually, never mind on that bet. I don’t want to have to root any harder for Zito than is necessary.

[quote]therajraj wrote:
I enjoyed this gamereax.com is for sale | HugeDomains [/quote]

Haha, it was great. I’m pretty sure Greinke didn’t mean to hit Quentin, but you can tell Greinke said something to him after Quentin stared him down. Funny thing is Greinke broke his collarbone. Not that I wish injuries on players or anything. Either way it was rather amusing.

^ I just saw the highlights and I had to laugh, not because Greinke got injured. But it reminded me of that little kid in high school that talks shit thinking he’s untouchable than getting his ass beat lol.

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
DB - care to comment on Zito’s miraculous comeback? I know you’ve been outspoken about him in the past…[/quote]

I don’t know what to say. He’s one of the many examples of a pitcher who lost significant velocity on his fastball and made the adjustment. Of course, it took him almost the entirety of his contract to figure it out, but better late than never.

The thing with him was that he never had great control to begin with. Back when he was with the A’s he wasn’t a hard thrower by any means, but he did throw harder than he does now. His arm speed was better, so not only was his fastball more like 88-89 on a regular basis, but the better arm speed allowed him to spin the curveball out of his hand much more sharply, and the break was later and sharper as a result, even if the speed was essentially the same as it is now.

He didn’t throw much of a changeup and I don’t think he really threw anything else back then, either. So, not only did he have to learn how to command what he DID feature (which was diminished in effectiveness), he had to learn some new pitches as well. It’s one thing to learn how to survive with what you already know how to throw. It’s another thing entirely to make that adjustment on the fly while ALSO learning new pitches. Lincecum needs to make the same multi-adjustment change in his game.

Now Zito throws a little cutter, a changeup, he can sink the fastball a bit and he still has an above average curve. If you can throw that repertoire of pitches for quality strikes, you can succeed in the majors regardless of how fast the fastball is. He’s learned how to throw all of those pitches for strikes now and he’s figured out how to differentiate the speed between each of them.

The 4-seam fastball tops out at about 86 now, but he’s more like 84-85 with that. The cutter he throws is about 80-82, the changeup is about 75-76, and the curve still drops in at about 70. That’s enough of a difference in speed from pitch to pitch to be effective. It doesn’t hurt that he can change speeds pretty decently with his curve. I’ve seen him throw it anywhere from 75 to about 68 in the same start.

If he makes a mistake out over the plate, he still is going to get pounded, but now hitters are starting to miss those mistakes every once in a while because they have more pitches to respect and they don’t necessarily just sit on one speed anymore. Before, he really only had two speeds that a hitter had to respect (fastball and curve), and they were going to get one of the two at least once in an at-bat. So they just sat on one speed and since he didn’t have good control, when they got what they were looking for it was typically in a location that they could really do something with.

Also, he’s starting to pitch inside more effectively, which is key for any pitcher. He can soft ball a guy down and away with several different movements and speeds and then spot that 85mph fastball at the belt inside and it looks much quicker as a result.

So yeah, I don’t know what to say about it. [/quote]

Interesting, I don’t see him pitch much at all and figured he was toast after as many bad, horrible years as he had. I was also wondering if you still hated him with a passion, haha.

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
DB - care to comment on Zito’s miraculous comeback? I know you’ve been outspoken about him in the past…[/quote]

After 14IP you’re declaring it a miraculous comeback? Really?

I bet by mid June he’ll be his usual shitbag self.

Sample size is a thing.[/quote]

Obviously you don’t know what you’re talking about and didn’t watch the postseason last year. The Giants have won 16 straight games with Zito on the mound.

His last ten starts, including the postseason? 9-0 with a 1.63 ERA. That includes starts against two of the best lineups in the NL in Cincy and S. Louis.[/quote]

And? Did you watch the last 4 fucking years?

Even if you go back to the tail end of last year it’s still a tiny sample.

His comment is still absurd

[quote]DBCooper wrote:
Actually, never mind on that bet. I don’t want to have to root any harder for Zito than is necessary.[/quote]

Lol

Of course not. Because by seasons end dickey will be great and Zito will have his usual mid 4 ERA.

The only person he is capsble out pitching will be Tim Lincecum.

I know you probably just proposed that bet on impulse because deep down you have absolutely no faith in Zito (rightfully so).

Actually Lanky, miraculous isn’t that bad a word choice. Barring Divine intervention, he’s going to get shelled again this year.

I’m not a religious man personally, so I don’t buy it.

RA Dickey’s knuckler sits at 80mph. Barry Zito’s FASTBALL sits at 83mph.

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

[quote]johnman18 wrote:
^ I just saw the highlights and I had to laugh, not because Greinke got injured. But it reminded me of that little kid in high school that talks shit thinking he’s untouchable than getting his ass beat lol.[/quote]

Yeah, I wouldn’t want to pick a fight with Q. Guy looks a lot more built in real life than he does on T.V.

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
DB - care to comment on Zito’s miraculous comeback? I know you’ve been outspoken about him in the past…[/quote]

After 14IP you’re declaring it a miraculous comeback? Really?

I bet by mid June he’ll be his usual shitbag self.

Sample size is a thing.[/quote]

Obviously you don’t know what you’re talking about and didn’t watch the postseason last year. The Giants have won 16 straight games with Zito on the mound.

His last ten starts, including the postseason? 9-0 with a 1.63 ERA. That includes starts against two of the best lineups in the NL in Cincy and S. Louis.[/quote]

And? Did you watch the last 4 fucking years?

Even if you go back to the tail end of last year it’s still a tiny sample.

His comment is still absurd

[/quote]

Now you’re making his point for him. Of course I watched the last four years prior to last year. They were horrendous beyond belief. That’s why what he’s done the last year is a “miraculous comeback”. He’s come back, he’s pitched well in the postseason and won a World Series ring (not counting 2010 since he wasn’t even on the playoff roster) and given how bad he was, it is nothing short of a miracle.

What would constitute a large enough sample size for you? The fact is that RA Dickey has exactly ONE stellar year under his belt at the tender young age of 37 and you were ready to anoint him the ace of the staff on what you thought would be the best team in the AL this year. Quite a bold prediction based on a very small sample size.

If you want to argue baseball with me, fine. I’ll slaughter you like I have in every other baseball argument we’ve had. But at least argue from an intellectually consistent, honest standpoint.