Wow. Miss Nikki, you have a great attitude and it shows. I’m glad you posted here. I’ve been feeling a little flat lately, and the posative outlook you’ve demonstrated is just the kind of boost that I’ve needed.
Thanks!
[quote]PGA200X wrote:
Whats wrong with a tramp stamp? Do men want a woman dress all dressed in white, attending church on Suandays and calling their parents mother and father when she’s in her 30’s while she practices walking with a book on her head? Sorry, little missy proper aint the chick for me.[/quote]
Here’s the rule of thumb I adhere to.
A lady at the table, a whore in bed.
[quote]BADASS MENTALITY wrote:
PGA200X wrote:
Whats wrong with a tramp stamp? Do men want a woman dress all dressed in white, attending church on Suandays and calling their parents mother and father when she’s in her 30’s while she practices walking with a book on her head? Sorry, little missy proper aint the chick for me.
Here’s the rule of thumb I adhere to.
A lady at the table, a whore in bed.
[/quote]
Yeah, why settle for less when you can have both? 
[quote]jacross wrote:
So we’ve established that that photo isn’t slutty.
The clear next step is for you to post a pic that IS slutty.
…ahh for comparitive purposes so we can end this debate once and for all.[/quote]
Yeah… we would need this to contrast & compare …
[quote]missnikki wrote:
yes, i’m going to compete next year at USAs. I took 6th there last year so I dep hope to improve that placing!
I’m trying to bring my legs back up to where they were in 2002 when I competed as a bodybuilder. I use to squat #275 for reps but weighed more back then…gradually building back up. Mainly my lower teardrop needs to be a bit deeper and my outer quad sweep. Let me see if I can find a picture from 2002…at Jr. USAs where i placed 3rd.[/quote]
Congrats and good luck next year. That’s a very impressive squat, you probably smoke most of the keyboard warriors giving you shit.
Some weird stuff posted in this thread.
[quote]Amsterdam Animal wrote:
You know what, you are right man. I did not mention any names on purpose b/c I dont think everyone is like that. But I guess the “every fck on this site" kinda negated the no-name reference in my post. I guess it should have been more like "every other fck”, haha.
I especially agree with the second part of your post. I was actually the guy who invited Jamie onto this site and we all know how that turned out…
[/quote]
Geez, that was ugly eh? The worst part is that most of the people who act like such immature jackasses on these boards wouldn’t have the stones to try any of it in person.
I hear you on the first part of your post - while I train for part aesthetics and part athletics, there is a certain core group lurking around on here who just have nothing good to say about BBing, which I find completely baffling. Even if someone’s goal is not to be big time huge like you, morepain, Prof X, etc., I mean give the damn props for the level of hard work, commitment and smarts in training it takes to get to that level.
[quote]Kuz wrote:
Amsterdam Animal wrote:
You know what, you are right man. I did not mention any names on purpose b/c I dont think everyone is like that. But I guess the “every fck on this site" kinda negated the no-name reference in my post. I guess it should have been more like "every other fck”, haha.
I especially agree with the second part of your post. I was actually the guy who invited Jamie onto this site and we all know how that turned out…
Geez, that was ugly eh? The worst part is that most of the people who act like such immature jackasses on these boards wouldn’t have the stones to try any of it in person.
I hear you on the first part of your post - while I train for part aesthetics and part athletics, there is a certain core group lurking around on here who just have nothing good to say about BBing, which I find completely baffling. Even if someone’s goal is not to be big time huge like you, morepain, Prof X, etc., I mean give the damn props for the level of hard work, commitment and smarts in training it takes to get to that level.[/quote]
You gotta remember most comments here or on any forum are just made by bored people who don’t care what they say. Its a lazy person’s way of interracting, but however, this forum is useful.
I can hang…
[quote]BADASS MENTALITY wrote:
Here’s the rule of thumb I adhere to.
A lady at the table, a whore in bed.[/quote]
Exactly, Badass. You make me wonder why I hadn’t posted that philosophy yet myself. Thank you.
Here’s where I try to pass on keys to happiness for slow people:
A person can love sex and not be a ho. It’s really simple, see, it involves sex as an expression of affection and a pleasureful bonding with a special person, with whom their life (and great sex) is shared. Sex is then personal, and not flaunted exhibition style in public.
“Lady at the table” is every mature guy’s dream. Mature women project this image, and land a guy with values. And that would be a guy who doesn’t talk like a whore-monger either.
Of course, maturity typically happens so much later these days. This, since world intelligence and wisdom plummeted rapidly due to decrepit cultural programming becoming dominant, when kids are raised by salacious new media such as television and radio.
What’s advertised is a numbers game, to bed the most, for immature and insecure members of both sexes. Shouting from the rooptops by unscrupulous children of all ages, who’s multivarious sexual conquests seem the only source of self-worth in their devalued world; where being a trash basket means fitting in.
Develop a sense of unconditional value, and learn to identify others who have done the same.
And dump/don’t pursue anyone who’s revealed to have overriding elements of being empty drone, in the dominant culture of stupidity and ego fragility.
People should pick up on this shit earlier in the process of growing up, either told by an elder or more likely learned by observation and deduction. I guess there’s still time.