[quote]katzenjammer wrote:
lixy wrote:
Totenkopf wrote:
How does she come across a dumb bitch?
She’s Miss California. What are the chances of her not being a dumb bitch?
Pretty good actually. California’s filled with smart bitches. [/quote]
X2
[quote]lixy wrote:
pushharder wrote:
lixy wrote:
Totenkopf wrote:
How does she come across a dumb bitch?
She’s Miss California. What are the chances of her not being a dumb bitch?
After reading your posts on this thread I think we all know who the real cocksucker is.
Not really.
But we sure know who the homophobe is.[/quote]
While on the subject on homophobe’s, whats your view on gay marriage?
She’s hotasfuck
Wasn’t this basically Obama’s position?
[quote]aussie486 wrote:
lixy wrote:
pushharder wrote:
lixy wrote:
Totenkopf wrote:
How does she come across a dumb bitch?
She’s Miss California. What are the chances of her not being a dumb bitch?
After reading your posts on this thread I think we all know who the real cocksucker is.
Not really.
But we sure know who the homophobe is.
While on the subject on homophobe’s, whats your view on gay marriage? [/quote]
If I were to vote on the issue, I’d side with the camp legalizing same-sex marriage.
Chances to reclaim freedoms should not be passed.
Push is right, you are attacking her view since you cannot attack anything else.
[quote]orion wrote:
Sifu wrote:
aussie486 wrote:
lixy wrote:
Totenkopf wrote:
How does she come across a dumb bitch?
She’s Miss California. What are the chances of her not being a dumb bitch?
Now now, anyway whats your view on gay marriage lixy.
Lixy believes in traditional marriage between one man and one to four women.
And why wouldn´t he, polygamy has a stronger and longer tradition than this judeo-christian perversion.
[/quote]
Why should women haters also be allowed to be polygamists? Something doesn’t add up here.
[quote]PB-Crawl wrote:
this is a pageant, not a stage for political discourse, theyre expected to say the “pc-what-everyone-expects” answer. theyre expected to be robots. [/quote]
If it isn’t a stage for political discourse then why was that question asked in the first place?
[quote]pushharder wrote:
lixy wrote:
Totenkopf wrote:
How does she come across a dumb bitch?
She’s Miss California. What are the chances of her not being a dumb bitch?
After reading your posts on this thread I think we all know who the real cocksucker is.[/quote]
When did I post about your mom?
[quote]Vert1go wrote:
orion wrote:
You seem to think that the Germans in the 30s somehow all turned evil.
They were scared and willing to close their eyes to some excesses of their regime in the beginning until it was too late.
Obviously that could never happen in America.
Are you stupid? How did I even get close to saying that? The Swastika, pretty clearly, stood for an anti-Semitic ideology. It’d be pretty hard to argue otherwise.
[/quote]
The swastika, pretty clearly, stood for no such thing and was used and admired all around the world including the US and the UK.
Now, in hindsight, it is the symbol of evil, then, when it was used, it was the shining beacon of progressivism.
[quote]valiant knight wrote:
orion wrote:
Sifu wrote:
aussie486 wrote:
lixy wrote:
Totenkopf wrote:
How does she come across a dumb bitch?
She’s Miss California. What are the chances of her not being a dumb bitch?
Now now, anyway whats your view on gay marriage lixy.
Lixy believes in traditional marriage between one man and one to four women.
And why wouldn´t he, polygamy has a stronger and longer tradition than this judeo-christian perversion.
Why should women haters also be allowed to be polygamists? Something doesn’t add up here.
[/quote]
Why should women have to marry a loser when they can share a success.
It is really a question of womens rights ;-)…
[quote]orion wrote:
Vert1go wrote:
orion wrote:
You seem to think that the Germans in the 30s somehow all turned evil.
They were scared and willing to close their eyes to some excesses of their regime in the beginning until it was too late.
Obviously that could never happen in America.
Are you stupid? How did I even get close to saying that? The Swastika, pretty clearly, stood for an anti-Semitic ideology. It’d be pretty hard to argue otherwise.
The swastika, pretty clearly, stood for no such thing and was used and admired all around the world including the US and the UK.
Now, in hindsight, it is the symbol of evil, then, when it was used, it was the shining beacon of progressivism.
[/quote]
you mean like this ^^ might be seen some day?
[quote]pushharder wrote:
lixy wrote:
Totenkopf wrote:
How does she come across a dumb bitch?
She’s Miss California. What are the chances of her not being a dumb bitch?
After reading your posts on this thread I think we all know who the real cocksucker is.[/quote]
Hahahaha!
[quote]orion wrote:
valiant knight wrote:
Why should women haters also be allowed to be polygamists? Something doesn’t add up here.
Why should women have to marry a loser when they can share a success.
It is really a question of womens rights ;-)…
[/quote]
[quote]orion wrote:
Vert1go wrote:
orion wrote:
You seem to think that the Germans in the 30s somehow all turned evil.
They were scared and willing to close their eyes to some excesses of their regime in the beginning until it was too late.
Obviously that could never happen in America.
Are you stupid? How did I even get close to saying that? The Swastika, pretty clearly, stood for an anti-Semitic ideology. It’d be pretty hard to argue otherwise.
The swastika, pretty clearly, stood for no such thing and was used and admired all around the world including the US and the UK.
Now, in hindsight, it is the symbol of evil, then, when it was used, it was the shining beacon of progressivism.
[/quote]
Here’s a building in the US.
"DECATUR, AL (AP / WCBS 880) – From the ground, the Wesley Acres Methodist retirement home looks like any other building. But fly over in an airplane, and the outline is unmistakable: It’s one big swastika.
Prompted by complaints from a Jewish activist, the agency that owns the government-funded building is planning to alter its shape to disguise the Nazi symbol. The move comes just a few years after a $1 million design modification meant to quiet similar complaints from a U.S. senator.
The difficulty is there are a limited number of options for fixing a building that has been there for some time,'' said Mike Giles, counsel for the Methodist Homes Corp. of Alabama and Northwest Florida. We have to come up with a way to fix an appearance that we want solved and not hurt our residents.‘’
Obviously the Swastika has meant different things over time. Obviously the hammer and sickle are just a pair of tools.
Obviously a cross is just two lines intersecting.
But in Germany in the late 20s, 30s and 40s, the swastika was the symbol of the Nazis. Who were an openly violent and anti-semitic organisation. That is not debatable.
I never said that all germans at the time were Nazis. All I said was that most knew what the Swastika stood for in that context.
I’m not sure what the nursing home has to do with this though. What do you mean?
This is why starting nazi analogies is a bad idea…
Neither Miss California’s response nor her manner of delivering it deserved Mr. Hilton’s most ungracious remarks in his blog.
As for the score of 0, evaluating that would require that I give at least some consideration to how beauty pageant responses ought to be scored. That, I will not do.
I think what many fail to realize by saying “this is not a proper question for a beauty pageant” and that Perez Hilton should not be a judge, is who stands to gain from controversial questions. I saw Trump on Fox News and he looked like a pig in shit that this much attention was being showered on his pageant. It was quite apparent he didn’t give two shits about who won or lost.