Military Analysis of War w/ Iran

Iraq was a piece of cake compared to the resistance you guys might face from Iran.
Though the overwhelming majority of the world opposed the 2nd Iraq war, not many people cared for the dictator’s life. In fact, some good came out of it in the toppling of his regime.
But an attack on Teheran will inevitably mean large-scale terrorist attacks on US soil on top of a fierce resistance by the Iranian army.

If I was a US military planner knowing the shitty state of the troops in Iraq, and the commander in chief phones with orders to attack, I’ll seriously consider dropping a couple of nukes on them. That’s a perfectly viable option from a military perpective and a pretty scary thing.

[quote]lixy wrote:
Iraq was a piece of cake compared to the resistance you guys might face from Iran.
Though the overwhelming majority of the world opposed the 2nd Iraq war, not many people cared for the dictator’s life. In fact, some good came out of it in the toppling of his regime.
But an attack on Teheran will inevitably mean large-scale terrorist attacks on US soil on top of a fierce resistance by the Iranian army.

If I was a US military planner knowing the shitty state of the troops in Iraq, and the commander in chief phones with orders to attack, I’ll seriously consider dropping a couple of nukes on them. That’s a perfectly viable option from a military perpective and a pretty scary thing.[/quote]

Good Post

People who still buy into the “war on terror” should definitely read this;

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070305fa_fact_hersh

[quote]lixy wrote:
People who still buy into the “war on terror” should definitely read this;

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070305fa_fact_hersh
[/quote]

Good read. Very informative. Thanks for putting it up.

Ok, here is a link that I found over on Smallwarscouncil: http://www.csis.org/media/csis/pubs/070305_iran_israelius.pdf

It gets down to the nitty gritty details that we are looking for, put out by CSIS


I thought that Borat was a fictional character. I seriously didn’t know he was the president of a country.

A piece by an Iranian totally opposed to the current regime.

http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=67&ItemID=12263

[quote]RatHunter wrote:
I thought that Borat was a fictional character. I seriously didn’t know he was the president of a country.
[/quote]

Borat is Kazakhstani–thay have the world’s best potassium. The bearded guy in your picture is clearly Iranian.

[quote]lixy wrote:
hedo wrote:
Are you actually making a point or simply pointing out how silly the Iranian response is?

I’ll try to draw an analogy for you. Suppose I want to talk you into quitting weightlifting. Since it’s your right to do, you’d want to hear some reasons, or maybe get a compensation for that, right?
Now, I demand that you quit lifting weight before we even sit down and talk about it. What is there to negociate if I’ve already got what I wanted; i.e: you quitting the gym and protein shakes.

US citizens aren’t dancing in the strrets calling for “Death to Iran” and “Death to Israel” and US elected representatives aren’t calling for anyone’s distraction.

No. US elected representatives are not calling for anyone’s distraction(sic). They only call other countries “axis of evil” and such then proceed to obliterate them. The task of expropriating and raping the locals is then started.
Read a bit on the forums around here. Americans are calling for them to be “nuked”. Ask JeffR on his opinion on the matter.

You do realize one nation is a superpower and the other a State sponsor of terrorism.

I agree with the US being a state that sponsors terrorism but don’t see why you call Iran a superpower. As a matter of fact, the International Court of Justice agrees with that as well (look up their verdict on American sponsored terrorism in Nicaragua from 1986).

Contrast the following:

The US has more history of state-sponsored terrorism that iran could ever dream of.[/quote]

Lixy your wit and sarcasim do not overcome your lack of understanding of world affairs. Are you lecturing me on politics and what I understand…your a newbie son…get over yourself.

Now an analogy has to make sense and draw a parallel that illuminates the subject and I don’t think that’s what your trying to do. And since you only seem to post in the political section of a bodybuilding site I’ll assume weightlifitng is not a big interest of yours which renders your analogy even more pointless and devoid of humor.

Try this analogy: Say I own a herd of goats. In the past you have held some of my goats hostage for 444 days, you have paid others to kill my goats, you and your friends get together and chant “death to Hedo’s goats” and Hedo’s goats are “the great satan”. You then announce to me that you are building a weapon for “peaceful” purposes but in moments of euphoria you announce, to others, you will use it to kill all my goats and those of my friend izzy. Since you are small and weak and I am strong and powerful I demand that you stop building the weapon. Now why would I allow you to keep building the weapon, while we discuss the matter. I would be granting you legitimacy and raising the risk for me. Because I am honorable I will tell you first not to build it, but if you continue to be belligerent it is only my own restraint that keeps me from striking a crippling blow upon you. At that point I’m sure you will be a lot more agreeable and if you are not you will be in an even weaker position should I decide to use a more permanent solution to protect my goats.

There you see that is an analogy that illuminates the issue and explains it in a manner you may be able to understand better. So lixy stay away from my goats because the weapon you are builing is a fool’s errand and I have already built thousands of them for my defense.

This, if true, could give the U.S. a bonanza of information, including locations of targets:

http://www.julescrittenden.com/2007/03/07/general-panic/

[quote]hedo wrote:
Lixy your wit and sarcasim do not overcome your lack of understanding of world affairs.[/quote]

I think that it’s rather your blind devotion to the star-spangled banner, war-mongering media and…oh, nevermind.

Again with the ad-hominem?

I started lifting four months ago. I religiously read the articles that make T-Nation what it is and after realizing that the best I can offer on those threads are “Thank you very much for the wonderful advices” comments. Did that for a while though.

You’re overlooking the fact that some of your intelligence goats overthrew my democratically elected president and put a tyrannical puppet in power. In my book, that’s reason enough to hold your goats as hostages.

Where did you get the impression that a nuclear reactor is a weapon? And where did you ever get the idea that Ahmadinejad was after your and izzy’s goats. To quote you: “You then announce to me that you are building a weapon for “peaceful” purposes but in moments of euphoria you announce, to others, you will use it to kill all my goats and those of my friend izzy.”

If you’re referring to the (in)famous mistranslation of the “wiped off the map” speech, I’d redirect you to the infatigable Mr. Steele.

Do I trust Iran with a bomb? Hell no! The fact of the matter is that I don’t trust Bush with it either.

Also, your analogy wouldn’t stand close scrutiny since Pakistan is directly associated with Al-Qaeda, has crowds chanting “death to hedo’s goats” in the streets, and not only got away with building a bomb but also with selling nuclear technology to some of your most notorious enemies (Abdul Quadeer Khan, anyone?)

[quote]lixy wrote:
People who still buy into the “war on terror” should definitely read this;

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070305fa_fact_hersh [/quote]

People who buy in to Seymour Hersh’s piece (or really anything by Seymour Hersh in about the past 20 years or so) should read this: A Muckraker on the Wane?

[quote]lixy wrote:
hedo wrote:
Lixy your wit and sarcasim do not overcome your lack of understanding of world affairs.

I think that it’s rather your blind devotion to the star-spangled banner, war-mongering media and…oh, nevermind.

Are you lecturing me on politics and what I understand…your a newbie son…get over yourself.

Again with the ad-hominem?

Now an analogy has to make sense and draw a parallel that illuminates the subject and I don’t think that’s what your trying to do. And since you only seem to post in the political section of a bodybuilding site I’ll assume weightlifitng is not a big interest of yours which renders your analogy even more pointless and devoid of humor.

I started lifting four months ago. I religiously read the articles that make T-Nation what it is and after realizing that the best I can offer on those threads are “Thank you very much for the wonderful advices” comments. Did that for a while though.

Try this analogy: Say I own a herd of goats. In the past you have held some of my goats hostage for 444 days, you have paid others to kill my goats, you and your friends get together and chant “death to Hedo’s goats” and Hedo’s goats are “the great satan”. You then announce to me that you are building a weapon for “peaceful” purposes but in moments of euphoria you announce, to others, you will use it to kill all my goats and those of my friend izzy. Since you are small and weak and I am strong and powerful I demand that you stop building the weapon. Now why would I allow you to keep building the weapon, while we discuss the matter. I would be granting you legitimacy and raising the risk for me. Because I am honorable I will tell you first not to build it, but if you continue to be belligerent it is only my own restraint that keeps me from striking a crippling blow upon you. At that point I’m sure you will be a lot more agreeable and if you are not you will be in an even weaker position should I decide to use a more permanent solution to protect my goats.

You’re overlooking the fact that some of your intelligence goats overthrew my democratically elected president and put a tyrannical puppet in power. In my book, that’s reason enough to hold your goats as hostages.

Where did you get the impression that a nuclear reactor is a weapon? And where did you ever get the idea that Ahmadinejad was after your and izzy’s goats. To quote you: “You then announce to me that you are building a weapon for “peaceful” purposes but in moments of euphoria you announce, to others, you will use it to kill all my goats and those of my friend izzy.”

If you’re referring to the (in)famous mistranslation of the “wiped off the map” speech, I’d redirect you to the infatigable Mr. Steele.

Do I trust Iran with a bomb? Hell no! The fact of the matter is that I don’t trust Bush with it either.

Also, your analogy wouldn’t stand close scrutiny since Pakistan is directly associated with Al-Qaeda, has crowds chanting “death to hedo’s goats” in the streets, and not only got away with building a bomb but also with selling nuclear technology to some of your most notorious enemies (Abdul Quadeer Khan, anyone?)[/quote]

I like the Star Spangled banner and war has solved a lot of problems over the years. Nazism, Soviet Communism, etc.I 'd rather fight for a good cause then die a cowardly shamefuil death. Lot’s of people feel that way. It’s not that common in other parts of the world.
Radical Islam will fall the same way.

Well you are a newbie so how is that an ad- hominem attack, it’s more of a statement of the obvious. Are you saying you are a veterna poster? Sounds like the same logic you are using with Iran and it’s overthow of the government in the 50’s. It’s tangental to the argument, at best.

The difference is you don’t trust Iran with a nuclear weapon but are powerless to do anything about it. You then project that weakness onto others and assume it is a virtue. It’s not.

Whether you trust Bush with the bomb is not relevant and simply points to a shallow understanding of the situation, nothing more. Iran is responsible for the position Iran is in now. Iran is treading water and sinking more and more.

Take your own advice about reading more before commenting. It worked for you before.

[quote]hedo wrote:
Sounds like the same logic you are using with Iran and it’s overthow of the government in the 50’s. It’s tangental to the argument, at best.[/quote]

So you prefer the theory according to which the Iranians woke up one day, and out of the blue, decided to hate America. And I suppose that your interventionist history south the border is tangental to the fact that the crushing majority of Latin Americans consider the US “an imperialist country”.

People forgive, but never forget.

[quote]lixy wrote:
hedo wrote:
Sounds like the same logic you are using with Iran and it’s overthow of the government in the 50’s. It’s tangental to the argument, at best.

So you prefer the theory according to which the Iranians woke up one day, and out of the blue, decided to hate America. And I suppose that your interventionist history south the border is tangental to the fact that the crushing majority of Latin Americans consider the US “an imperialist country”.

People forgive, but never forget.[/quote]

Lixy

Please be honest. No matter what anyone says to you, you’ve made up your mind.

You’ve been brainwashed and your young and idealistic. You also come from a part of the world where it’s easier to blame others for your problems rather then fix them. You don’t know any better and unfortunately your ok with that.

Yes South America is again a tangent to the discussion at hand. Iranians didn’t just wake up hating the US, it was drummed into them. Fact is most still don’t but the thugs in charge don’t like to hear that.

Suck it up kid and try and learn. And don’t visit Iran anytime soon, you may get some firsthand experience with diplomacy by other means.

At this point your boring me and not saying much new so have a great day.

[quote]hedo wrote:
You also come from a part of the world where it’s easier to blame others for your problems rather then fix them.[/quote]

Problems? Don’t see what you’re talking about.
I don’t have any.

All I ever tried to do around here was to show that the ubiquitous double-standard; Namely that, by definition, anything the US does cannot be a crime. I’m just reminding you that it’s not always true and that the US has a history of state-sponsored terrorism that is rarely, if ever, acknowledged.

Like I said, you adhere to the spontaneous generation doctrine. You’re still avoiding the causality principle.

Since WWII you backed coups in all of the following countries. I’ll restrict the list to successful ones and will only mention once the countries that endured several coups:
Syria, Greece, Cuba, Iran, British Guyana, Guatemala, South Vietnam, Haiti, Laos, South Korea, Ecuador, Dominican Republic, Honduras, Guatemala, Brazil, Bolivia, Zaire, Ghana, Cambodia, El Salvador, Chile, Australia, Liberia, Chad, Grenada, Fiji, Venezuela.

Then you pathetically dwell into “Why do they hate us?” when the answer is right in front of you.

[quote]lixy wrote:
hedo wrote:
You also come from a part of the world where it’s easier to blame others for your problems rather then fix them.

Problems? Don’t see what you’re talking about.
I don’t have any.

All I ever tried to do around here was to show that the ubiquitous double-standard; Namely that, by definition, anything the US does cannot be a crime. I’m just reminding you that it’s not always true and that the US has a history of state-sponsored terrorism that is rarely, if ever, acknowledged.

Yes South America is again a tangent to the discussion at hand. Iranians didn’t just wake up hating the US, it was drummed into them.

Like I said, you adhere to the spontaneous generation doctrine. You’re still avoiding the causality principle.

Since WWII you backed coups in all of the following countries. I’ll restrict the list to successful ones and will only mention once the countries that endured several coups:
Syria, Greece, Cuba, Iran, British Guyana, Guatemala, South Vietnam, Haiti, Laos, South Korea, Ecuador, Dominican Republic, Honduras, Guatemala, Brazil, Bolivia, Zaire, Ghana, Cambodia, El Salvador, Chile, Australia, Liberia, Chad, Grenada, Fiji, Venezuela.

Then you pathetically dwell into “Why do they hate us?” when the answer is right in front of you.[/quote]

Lixy

You have a lot of problems. Your in denial over most topics you discuss. Why didn’t you attend school in the middle east or Africa? Think you’ll find work in your field in either of those places? Sounds like a lot of problems already and you haven’t even embarked on the journey thru adulthood.

Your retoric and attempts to frame the discussion between narrow points simply isn’t working. You don’t seem to undertand that. I don’t buy into your attempts to paint the US as a terrorist state and your continued rant shows nothing more then frustration as opposed to reason. Like I said it’s boring.

As to why they hate us…why do you think we care? That must be frustrating huh.

I was going to post more on this thread but I haven’t had much time recently. Here’s an interesting analysis of how the first day of the war might unfold, written by a USAF veteran. Comments at the bottom.

[quote]
Day One -
The War With Iran

The war began as planned. The Israeli pilots took off well before dawn and streaked across Lebanon and northern Iraq, high above Kirkuk. Flying US-made F-15 and F-16s, the Israelis separated over the mountains of western Iran, the pilots gesturing a last minute show of confidence in their mission, maintaining radio silence.

Just before the sun rose over Tehran, moments before the Muslim call to prayer, the missiles struck their targets. While US Air Force AWACS planes circled overhead–listening, watching, recording–heavy US bombers followed minutes later. Bunker-busters and mini-nukes fell on dozens of targets while Iranian anti-aircraft missiles sped skyward.

The ironically named Bushehr nuclear power plant crumbled to dust. Russian technicians and foreign nationals scurried for safety. Most did not make it.

Targets in Saghand and Yazd, all of them carefully chosen many months before by Pentagon planners, were destroyed. The uranium enrichment facility in Natanz; a heavy water plant and radioisotope facility in Arak; the Ardekan Nuclear Fuel Unit; the Uranium Conversion Facility and Nuclear Technology Center in Isfahan; were struck simultaneously by USAF and Israeli bomber groups.

The Tehran Nuclear Research Center, the Tehran Molybdenum, Iodine and Xenon Radioisotope Production Facility, the Tehran Jabr Ibn Hayan Multipurpose Laboratories, the Kalaye Electric Company in the Tehran suburbs were destroyed.

Iranian fighter jets rose in scattered groups. At least those Iranian fighter planes that had not been destroyed on the ground by swift and systematic air strikes from US and Israeli missiles. A few Iranian fighters even launched missiles, downing the occasional attacker, but American top guns quickly prevailed in the ensuing dogfights.

The Iranian air force, like the Iranian navy, never really knew what hit them. Like the slumbering US sailors at Pearl Harbor, the pre-dawn, pre-emptive attack wiped out fully half the Iranian defense forces in a matter of hours.

By mid-morning, the second and third wave of US/Israeli raiders screamed over the secondary targets. The only problem now, the surprising effectiveness of the Iranian missile defenses. The element of surprise lost, US and Israeli warplanes began to fall from the skies in considerable numbers to anti-aircraft fire.

At 7:35 AM, Tehran time, the first Iranian anti-ship missile destroyed a Panamanian oil tanker, departing from Kuwait and bound for Houston. Launched from an Iranian fighter plane, the Exocet split the ship in half and set the ship ablaze in the Strait of Hormuz. A second and third tanker followed, black smoke billowing from the broken ships before they blew up and sank. By 8:15 AM, all ship traffic on the Persian Gulf had ceased.

US Navy ships, ordered earlier into the relative safety of the Indian Ocean, south of their base in Bahrain, launched counter strikes. Waves of US fighter planes circled the burning wrecks in the bottleneck of Hormuz but the Iranian fighters had fled.

At 9 AM, Eastern Standard Time, many hours into the war, CNN reported a squadron of suicide Iranian fighter jets attacking the US Navy fleet south of Bahrain. Embedded reporters aboard the ships–sending live feeds directly to a rapt audience of Americans just awakening–reported all of the Iranian jets destroyed, but not before the enemy planes launched dozens of Exocet and Sunburn anti-ship missiles. A US aircraft carrier, cruiser and two destroyers suffered direct hits. The cruiser blew up and sank, killing 600 men. The aircraft carrier sank an hour later.

By mid-morning, every military base in Iran was partially or wholly destroyed. Sirens blared and fires blazed from hundreds of fires. Explosions rocked Tehran and the electrical power failed. The Al Jazeerah news station in Tehran took a direct hit from a satellite bomb, leveling the entire block.

At 9:15 AM, Baghdad time, the first Iranian missile struck the Green Zone. For the next thirty minutes a torrent of missiles landed on GPS coordinates carefully selected by Shiite militiamen with cell phones positioned outside the Green Zone and other permanent US bases. Although US and Israeli bomber pilots had destroyed 90% of the Iranian missiles, enough Shahabs remained to fully destroy the Green Zone, the Baghdad airport, and a US Marine base. Thousands of unsuspecting US soldiers died in the early morning barrage. Not surprisingly, CNN and Fox withheld the great number of casualties from American viewers.

By 9:30 AM, gas stations on the US east coast began to raise their prices. Slowly at first and then altogether in a panic, the prices rose. $4 a gallon, and then $5 and then $6, the prices skyrocketed. Worried motorists, rushing from work, roared into the nearest gas station, radios blaring the latest reports of the pre-emptive attack on Iran. While fistfights broke out in gas stations everywhere, the third Middle Eastern war had begun.

In Washington DC, the spin began minutes after the first missile struck its intended target. The punitive strike–not really a war said the harried White House spokesman–would further democracy and peace in the Middle East. Media pundits mostly followed the party line. By ridding Iran of weapons of mass destruction, Donald Rumsfeld declared confidently on CNN, Iran might follow in the footsteps of Iraq, and enjoy the hard won fruits of freedom.

The president scheduled a speech at 2 PM. Gas prices rose another two dollars before then. China and Japan threatened to dump US dollars. Gold rose $120 an ounce. The dollar plummeted against the Euro.

CNN reported violent, anti-American protests in Paris, London, Rome, Berlin and Dublin. Fast food franchises throughout Europe, carrying American corporate logos, were firebombed.

A violent coup toppled the pro-American Pakistan president. On the New York Stock Exchange, prices fell in a frenzy of trading–except for the major petroleum producers. A single, Iranian Shahab missile struck Tel Aviv, destroying an entire city block. Israel vowed revenge, and threatened a nuclear strike on Tehran, before a hastily called UN General Assembly in New York City eased tensions.

An orange alert in New York City suddenly reddened to a full-scale terror alarm when a package detonated on a Manhattan subway. Mayor Bloomberg declared martial law. Governor Pataki ordered the New York National Guard fully mobilized, mobilizing what few national guardsmen remained in the state.

President Bush looked shaken at 2 PM. The scroll below the TV screen reported Persian Gulf nations halting production of oil until the conflict could be resolved peacefully. Venezuelan president, Hugo Chavez, announced a freeze in oil deliveries to the US would begin immediately. Tony Blair offered to mediate peace negotiations, between the US and Israel and Iran, but was resoundingly rejected.

By 6 PM, Eastern Standard Time, gas prices had stabilized at just below $10 a gallon. A Citgo station in Texas, near Fort Sam Houston Army base, was firebombed. No one claimed responsibility. Terrorism was not ruled out.

At sunset, the call to prayer–in Tehran, Baghdad, Islamabad, Ankara, Jerusalem, Jakarta, Riyadh–sounded uncannily like the buzzing of enraged bees. [/quote]

www.rense.com/general69/dayone.htm

Two paragraph to note from the above piece:

[b]The only problem now, the surprising effectiveness of the Iranian missile defenses. The element of surprise lost, US and Israeli warplanes began to fall from the skies in considerable numbers to anti-aircraft fire

Embedded reporters aboard the ships–sending live feeds directly to a rapt audience of Americans just awakening–reported all of the Iranian jets destroyed, but not before the enemy planes launched dozens of Exocet and Sunburn anti-ship missiles. A US aircraft carrier, cruiser and two destroyers suffered direct hits. The cruiser blew up and sank, killing 600 men. The aircraft carrier sank an hour later. [/b]

This is a very important point, because Iran has recently been equipped with advanced Russian air defenses and offensive missiles.

The fact that this is acknowledged by a USAF veteran in a hypothetical “what-if” piece speaks volumes. Personally, I don’t think the conflict would be quite as one-sided as he describes.

Russia: Moscow Confirms Missile-Systems Deal With Iran

Tor M1 9M330 Air Defense System:
www.defense-update.com/products/t/tor.htm

SS-N-22 Sunburn Anti-Ship Missile “The most lethal cruise missile in the world today”

www.rense.com/general59/theSunburniransawesome.htm

[quote]hedo wrote:

As to why they hate us…why do you think we care?
[/quote]

Mushroom cloud over Manhattan.

No way for you to stop it.

Seems like an excellent reason to me.

Care, or they will make you care.

Former Iranian Defense Official Talks to Western Intelligence

By Dafna Linzer
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 8, 2007; A16

A former Iranian deputy defense minister who once commanded the Revolutionary Guard has left his country and is cooperating with Western intelligence agencies, providing information on Hezbollah and Iran’s ties to the organization, according to a senior U.S. official.

Ali Rez Asgari disappeared last month during a visit to Turkey. Iranian officials suggested yesterday that he may have been kidnapped by Israel or the United States. The U.S. official said Asgari is willingly cooperating. He did not divulge Asgari’s whereabouts or specify who is questioning him, but made clear that the information Asgari is offering is fully available to U.S. intelligence.

Asgari served in the Iranian government until early 2005 under then-President Mohammad Khatami. Asgari’s background suggests that he would have deep knowledge of Iran’s national security infrastructure, conventional weapons arsenal and ties to Hezbollah in south Lebanon.

Iranian officials said he was not involved in the country’s nuclear program, and the senior U.S. official said Asgari is not being questioned about it. Former officers with Israel’s Mossad spy agency said yesterday that Asgari had been instrumental in the founding of Hezbollah in the 1980s, around the time of the bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut.

Iran’s official news agency, IRNA, quoted the country’s top police chief, Brig. Gen. Esmaeil Ahmadi-Moqaddam, as saying that Asgari was probably kidnapped by agents working for Western intelligence agencies. The Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that Asgari was in the United States.

Another U.S. official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, denied that report and suggested that Asgari’s disappearance was voluntary and orchestrated by the Israelis. A spokesman for President Bush’s National Security Council did not return a call for comment.

The Israeli government denied any connection to Asgari. “To my knowledge, Israel is not involved in any way in this disappearance,” said Mark Regev, the spokesman for Israel’s foreign ministry.

An Iranian official, who agreed to discuss Asgari on the condition of anonymity, said that Iranian intelligence is unsure of Asgari’s whereabouts but that he may have been offered money, probably by Israel, to leave the country. The Iranian official said Asgari was thought to be in Europe. “He has been out of the loop for four or five years now,” the official said.

Israeli and Turkish newspapers reported yesterday that Asgari disappeared in Istanbul shortly after he arrived there on Feb. 7. Iran sent a delegation to Turkey to investigate his disappearance and requested help from Interpol in locating him.

Former Mossad director Danny Yatom, who is now a member of Israel’s parliament, said he believes Asgari defected to the West. “He is very high-caliber,” Yatom said. “He held a very, very senior position for many long years in Lebanon. He was in effect commander of the Revolutionary Guards” there.

Ram Igra, a former Mossad officer, said Asgari spent much of the 1980s and 1990s overseeing Iran’s efforts to support, finance, arm and train Hezbollah. The State Department lists the Shiite Lebanese group as a terrorist organization.

“He lived in Lebanon and, in effect, was the man who built, promoted and founded Hezbollah in those years,” Igra told Israeli state radio. “If he has something to give the West, it is in this context of terrorism and Hezbollah’s network in Lebanon.”

The organization, led by Hasan Nasrallah, is believed to have been behind several attacks against U.S., Jewish and Israeli interests worldwide, including the 1983 bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut that killed 241 Americans, and the 1994 bombing of a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires that killed more than 80 people.

Israel fought a bloody, month-long war with Hezbollah last summer in south Lebanon after the group seized two Israeli soldiers. The soldiers have not been returned and their fate is unknown. Other Israeli soldiers have vanished in Lebanon during decades of conflict along the countries’ shared border, most notably an Israeli airman named Ron Arad. Yatom said it is possible Asgari “knows quite a lot about Ron Arad.”

In a January briefing to Congress, then-Director of National Intelligence John D. Negroponte described Hezbollah as a growing threat to U.S. interests. “As a result of last summer’s hostilities, Hezbollah’s self-confidence and hostility toward the United States as a supporter of Israel could cause the group to increase its contingency planning against United States interests,” Negroponte said.

U.S. intelligence officials said they had no evidence that Hezbollah was actively planning attacks but noted that the organization has the capacity to do so if it feels threatened.