Metaphysics: The ACTUAL Key to Everything

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:<<< If man doesn’t have free will he is barely higher than the animals. He runs on instinct.[/quote]If man has a will free enough to change God’s then God is barely higher than the animals. You ARE gonna get this too.
[/quote]

So our choices are not really that. They are His choices and will. You really got me there. Because to will outcomes is to be above the causal chain of events already set in motion by the 1st cause. But if that is true, what makes us above the animals?

maybe the very fact that we are spiritually dead. Paradoxically.
While animals are physically alive.

And this is exactly where me and Tiribulus take separate roads.

[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:<<< If man doesn’t have free will he is barely higher than the animals. He runs on instinct.[/quote]If man has a will free enough to change God’s then God is barely higher than the animals. You ARE gonna get this too.
[/quote]

So our choices are not really that. They are His choices and will. You really got me there. Because to will outcomes is to be above the causal chain of events already set in motion by the 1st cause. But if that is true, what makes us above the animals? [/quote]Genesis 5:1-2[quote]In the day when God created man, He made him in the likeness of God. 2-He created them male and female, and He blessed them and named them Man in the day when they were created.[/quote]This is true though I have no idea how. God does know how though and that is far more than good enough for me. http://www.reformed.org/documents/index.html?mainframe=http://www.reformed.org/documents/westminster_conf_of_faith.html [quote]THE WESTMINSTER
CONFESSION OF FAITH
(1646)
CHAPTER III.
Of God’s Eternal Decree.
I. God from all eternity did by the most wise and holy counsel of his own will, freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass; yet so as thereby neither is God the author of sin; nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures, nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established.[/quote]
Take a look at that chapter on God’s eternal decree.

[quote]kamui wrote:

maybe the very fact that we are spiritually dead. Paradoxically.
While animals are physically alive.

And this is exactly where me and Tiribulus take separate roads.

[/quote]

What does spiritually dead mean?

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:<<< Aristotle and Aquinas both affirm this. >>>[/quote]The happy couple =] Hopefully Thomas is in heaven and has been properly chastised by Paul concerning his clear renunciation of Aristotle in his warnings to the Corinthians.
[/quote]

Except Paul wouldn’t do that, being a Stoic himself and using the means and ends of the pagan Stoics in his teachings and even using them to convert Stoics in the market place to Jesus. :slight_smile:

You forget that Paul condemned pagan wisdom that went against Scripture, not all pagan philosophy. He condemned all of pagan philosophy as much as he meant that all men have sinned. [/quote]You misunderstand and misappropriate both the passage in 1st Corinthians AND acts Chris. ANY philosophy for which the triune God is not the first all defining principle is automatically pagan. You ARE gonna get this.
[/quote]

Yet, he doesn’t condemn all pagan philosophies. Just ones that contradict truth. For example, him being a Stoic, even after his conversion.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:<<< If man doesn’t have free will he is barely higher than the animals. He runs on instinct.[/quote]If man has a will free enough to change God’s then God is barely higher than the animals. You ARE gonna get this too.
[/quote]

You’re equivocating.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
Take a look at that chapter on God’s eternal decree.
[/quote]

How about you explain it for once.

The observer, that which perceives and interprets its reality, is not an independent agent.

Without knowledge of self; without understanding of who you are, what you are comprised of, what your existence entails, you’re just shouting in the dark.

You don’t need a bible for this, or other religious studies. You don’t even need to have a college education, but you need to do something if you wish to understand.

Thought will take you to the gate, but only a silent mind can enter.

And that sounds very religious, doesn’t it?

maybe the very fact that we are spiritually dead. Paradoxically.
While animals are physically alive.
And this is exactly where me and Tiribulus take separate roads.
[/quote]What does spiritually dead mean?[/quote] Ephesians 2:1-10 [quote]1-And you were dead in your trespasses and sins, 2-in which you formerly walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, of the spirit that is now working in the sons of disobedience. 3-Among them we too all formerly lived in the lusts of our flesh, indulging the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, even as the rest. 4-But God, being rich in mercy, because of His great love with which He loved us, 5-even when we were dead in our transgressions, made us alive together with Christ (by grace you have been saved), 6-and raised us up with Him, and seated us with Him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, 7-so that in the ages to come He might show the surpassing riches of His grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus. 8-For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; 9-not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. 10-For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them.[/quote]This confession 301 redirect once again is almost impossible to improve upon for it’s exceedingly accurate representation of gospel truth as revealed in the Christian scriptures.[quote]CHAPTER VI.
Of the Fall of Man, of Sin, and of
the Punishment thereof.
I. Our first parents, begin seduced by the subtlety and temptations of Satan, sinned in eating the forbidden fruit. This their sin God was pleased, according to his wise and holy counsel, to permit, having purposed to order it to his own glory.

II. By this sin they fell from their original righteousness and communion with God, and so became dead in sin, and wholly defiled in all the faculties and parts of soul and body.

III. They being the root of mankind, the guilt of this sin was imputed, and the same death in sin and corrupted nature conveyed to all their posterity, descending from them by original generation.

IV. From this original corruption, whereby we are utterly indisposed, disabled, and made opposite to all good, and wholly inclined to all evil, do proceed all actual transgressions.

V. This corruption of nature, during this life, doth remain in those that are regenerated; and although it be through Christ pardoned and mortified, yet both itself, and all the motions thereof, are truly and properly sin.

VI. Every sin, both original and actual, being a transgression of the righteous law of God, and contrary thereunto, doth, in its own nature, bring guilt upon the sinner, whereby he is bound over to the wrath of God, and curse of the law, and so made subject to death, with all miseries spiritual, temporal, and eternal.[/quote]THIS is what makes autonomous man autonomous. He seeks to explain reality and most especially himself in terms that at all intellectual cost does NOT include what I have brought above. He will talk himself into believing literally anything except that. He will comfort himself with what he sees as an overwhelming abundance of evidence to support him. (Satan will be most helpful in this regard.) He can’t help it. He is dead to God his creator the same way that the physically deceased are dead to this reality we are living in now. You will have questions which is perfectly fine.

BTW, Kamui is legitimately brilliant and has been very gracious to me, but our disagreement begins far before this discussion here.

[quote]ephrem wrote:
The observer, that which perceives and interprets its reality, is not an independent agent.

Without knowledge of self; without understanding of who you are, what you are comprised of, what your existence entails, you’re just shouting in the dark.

You don’t need a bible for this, or other religious studies. You don’t even need to have a college education, but you need to do something if you wish to understand.

Thought will take you to the gate, but only a silent mind can enter.

And that sounds very religious, doesn’t it?

[/quote]See what I mean Fletch. ANYTHING

Show me T, without use of scripture, what makes man autonomous.

[quote]ephrem wrote:Show me T, without use of scripture, what makes man autonomous.[/quote]NOTHING, can be ultimately shown without scripture Ephrem. YOU have just shown what makes man autonomous. “Show me… on the basis of yourself”. Is what you just asked me. That’s autonomous man in action. He sees absolutely everything as subject to the feeble self exalted throne of his own intellect. (2Cor 10:12)
For we are not bold to class or compare ourselves with some of those who commend themselves; but when they measure themselves by themselves, and compare themselves with themselves, they are without understanding.

Okay then.

[quote]ephrem wrote:
The observer, that which perceives and interprets its reality, is not an independent agent.

Without knowledge of self; without understanding of who you are, what you are comprised of, what your existence entails, you’re just shouting in the dark.

You don’t need a bible for this, or other religious studies. You don’t even need to have a college education, but you need to do something if you wish to understand.

Thought will take you to the gate, but only a silent mind can enter.

And that sounds very religious, doesn’t it?

[/quote]

I don’t have much clue as to what you mean. What’s the gate? I agree that the observer (man or whatever other physical entity) is not independent, but is part of the chain of causality.

[quote]kamui wrote:

maybe the very fact that we are spiritually dead. Paradoxically.
While animals are physically alive.

And this is exactly where me and Tiribulus take separate roads.
[/quote]

I’ve been munching on this one and this what I have so far.

Your saying our spirits are separate from God’s. A non-personal God. But wouldn’t that apply to animals as well. Does everything have a spirit, or only people? And I’ve read a lot of definitions on what a spirit is and I’d like to know yours.

[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:

[quote]kamui wrote:

maybe the very fact that we are spiritually dead. Paradoxically.
While animals are physically alive.

And this is exactly where me and Tiribulus take separate roads.
[/quote]

I’ve been munching on this one and this what I have so far.

Your saying our spirits are separate from God’s. A non-personal God. But wouldn’t that apply to animals as well. Does everything have a spirit, or only people? And I’ve read a lot of definitions on what a spirit is and I’d like to know yours.[/quote]

The ancients referred to the soul as what we can translate as animate. Which we derive animal from. So, yes all animals have souls, however, not all animals have immortal souls.

[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:

[quote]ephrem wrote:
The observer, that which perceives and interprets its reality, is not an independent agent.

Without knowledge of self; without understanding of who you are, what you are comprised of, what your existence entails, you’re just shouting in the dark.

You don’t need a bible for this, or other religious studies. You don’t even need to have a college education, but you need to do something if you wish to understand.

Thought will take you to the gate, but only a silent mind can enter.

And that sounds very religious, doesn’t it?

[/quote]

I don’t have much clue as to what you mean. What’s the gate? I agree that the observer (man or whatever other physical entity) is not independent, but is part of the chain of causality. [/quote]

The gate is a metaphor for clear understanding of ones own being. Most of us start with the assumption that we’re actual, independent beings and we like to believe there’s a part of us that survives death.

But in reality we’re virtual beings who exist in a virtual [metaphysical] environment; thought.

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Fletch1986 wrote:

[quote]kamui wrote:

maybe the very fact that we are spiritually dead. Paradoxically.
While animals are physically alive.

And this is exactly where me and Tiribulus take separate roads.
[/quote]

I’ve been munching on this one and this what I have so far.

Your saying our spirits are separate from God’s. A non-personal God. But wouldn’t that apply to animals as well. Does everything have a spirit, or only people? And I’ve read a lot of definitions on what a spirit is and I’d like to know yours.[/quote]

The ancients referred to the soul as what we can translate as animate. Which we derive animal from. So, yes all animals have souls, however, not all animals have immortal souls. [/quote]

Why did God make it so we have eternal souls, but animals don’t?

[quote]ephrem wrote:<<< But in reality we’re virtual beings who exist in a virtual [metaphysical] environment; thought.[/quote]Proof please?

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

You don’t get to ask for proof when you can’t even prove the existence of your god.