[quote]unbending wrote:
That all you see?
What about the dude’s face? It looks like it was painted from scratch!
And look at his proportions. WTF? Where’s his waist? And what’s that dirty spot on his chest on the orange shirt? Make it look like a shadow, but it looks like a stain.
[/quote]
I didn’t exactly break out my loupe for this.
[quote]Fulmen wrote:
Why even look at such a magazine?[/quote]
Simple: interest in the subject matter. Of course, Men’s Fitness is no T-Nation – but they aren’t trying to be. To dis a publication for failing to cater to a certain interest that they aren’t gunning for is rather arbitrary – it’s like dissing, I don’t know, “Cat Fancy” for not having enough articles on ferrets.
[quote]Mr. Clean & Jerk wrote:
Fulmen wrote:
Why even look at such a magazine?
Simple: interest in the subject matter. Of course, Men’s Fitness is no T-Nation – but they aren’t trying to be. To dis a publication for failing to cater to a certain interest that they aren’t gunning for is rather arbitrary – it’s like dissing, I don’t know, “Cat Fancy” for not having enough articles on ferrets. [/quote]
Go find a cat message board or something if you want to talk about cats. If you want to talk about Men’s Fitness, go there.
Frankly, the forums would be much better if so many people who read Men’s Fitness did post here.
[quote]Mr. Clean & Jerk wrote:
it’s like dissing, I don’t know, “Cat Fancy” for not having enough articles on ferrets. [/quote]
that’s exactly why i canceled my subscription! FERRETS RULE
goin out on a limb here.
perhaps they intentionally made it fake, and sooooo much bigger than the other arm, possibly because he holds the fastest serve clocked in pro tennis (153 mph) I don’t know. just a thought.
[quote]CaliforniaLaw wrote:
Go find a cat message board or something if you want to talk about cats. If you want to talk about Men’s Fitness, go there.
Frankly, the forums would be much better if so many people who read Men’s Fitness did post here.
[/quote]
Its [Off Topic] as in you can post about things that dont have to do with T-Nation.
If T-Nation dosent have the answers to your question’s then it would be smart to post in a place that did.
But this thread wasnt a question just something funny that the OP thought he would share. Alot of people come here just because they find alot of this stuff amuseing I would bet money that most of the long time posters come almost completle for the funny posts/threads and intresting things posted by other users. I mean cmon most people who have been here for a while know that the articles are basicaly reposts with different words.[/rant]
[quote]CaliforniaLaw wrote:
Mr. Clean & Jerk wrote:
Fulmen wrote:
Why even look at such a magazine?
Simple: interest in the subject matter. Of course, Men’s Fitness is no T-Nation – but they aren’t trying to be. To dis a publication for failing to cater to a certain interest that they aren’t gunning for is rather arbitrary – it’s like dissing, I don’t know, “Cat Fancy” for not having enough articles on ferrets.
Go find a cat message board or something if you want to talk about cats. If you want to talk about Men’s Fitness, go there.
Frankly, the forums would be much better if so many people who read Men’s Fitness did post here.[/quote]
Um…I don’t really see what you mean in the second paragraph. What improvements would you expect (not challenging, I just don’t know.)
[quote]CaliforniaLaw wrote:
Mr. Clean & Jerk wrote:
Fulmen wrote:
Why even look at such a magazine?
Simple: interest in the subject matter. Of course, Men’s Fitness is no T-Nation – but they aren’t trying to be. To dis a publication for failing to cater to a certain interest that they aren’t gunning for is rather arbitrary – it’s like dissing, I don’t know, “Cat Fancy” for not having enough articles on ferrets.
Go find a cat message board or something if you want to talk about cats. If you want to talk about Men’s Fitness, go there.
Frankly, the forums would be much better if so many people who read Men’s Fitness did post here.
[/quote]
Are you going to post pictures of your bad self?
This magazine has the same crud headers on it as little girls magazines … womens magazines … and all the other trashy, aimed at idiot magazines out there.
Pure photoshop trash and a method to sell people advertising.
In the old days it was airbrushing.
Before that, they didn’t even bother with photos, they drew pictures.
At least everyone knew they were artwork.