Men afraid of commitment?

[quote]Dr. Pangloss wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

I spoke to my 80-something-year-old friend last night, the one who gave me a “sex talk” when I started dating after divorce, which included advice to carry not just one condom on hand, but rather two or three. She’s bewildered by my behavior because were she in my shoes she would NEVER seek a relationship. She wanted to know if I realize that I can just go get laid if I want to, as much as I want to - I don’t HAVE to be stuck with a man. So I said that I want someone I can, you know, love, and she made a scoffing noise. [/quote]

When I read your friends comments, I didn’t get the impression that she was telling you to sleep with everyone under the sun. Instead, I got the feeling that this was a woman who felt that the toll a relationship takes on a woman - especially a decades long relationship - is too much. And to quote Gloria Steinham, a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.

I may just be reading too much into her comments, though, because I recently had a similar conversation with my 71 year old mom. She said that as much as she loved my dad (married 29 years before he died 11 years ago) if she had to do it over, she wouldn’t have gotten married. She felt the trade-offs of raising a family during the 70’s and 80’s was at too great a cost to her personal growth and development.

Maybe that’s what your friend meant, that if sex were important to you, you could always sleep around, but that you didn’t need the baggage that goes along with a relationship. Because as much as we talk on TN about how much relationships suck for men, there’s a whole slew of women who feel that relationships aren’t working for them either.[/quote]

My friend had a marriage she didn’t like to a man neither of us particularly liked before his death a couple of years ago. He was a womanizer when he was younger, but then I don’t think she was faithful, either. She’s sort of a force of nature. Published author, masters in education and taught high school for a while, was in TV commercials back in the day, but she was also married initially to an alcoholic and wound up raising three boys on her own, then at some point met number two, the womanizer (an attorney). So more bitter toward men than feeling stifled, I would say. She thinks I’m naive in believing I can find a nice man. I think she’s so brusque and domineering that the men who would tolerate her would have to be weak, and thus disappointing to someone like her. She’s in her 80s and I swear to god, if she wanted to she could probably kick my ass. I’m guessing she’s 5’8" or so. What sort of old lady is that tall?? She’s terrifying, but also fascinating.

Your mom was raising kids in a different time, and I think my mom would have said the same. Well, in fact, my mom ditched the whole thing and went to do her own thing. I’ve grown up in different times, and don’t need anyone now.

But having someone would be nice. :slight_smile:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:
Am I really asking for too much?[/quote]

You didn’t say anything about not having neck tattoos, so maybe not.

Funny thing- There was a woman in front of me at a convenience store a few weeks ago. She had her hair pulled back into a tight pony tail and a noticeable nazi SS tattoo on her neck beneath her ear.

I couldn’t help but think “Now there’s a girl that will stab a motherfucker for her man.:)”.
[/quote]

Actually I did. I said “no tattoos”. She does sound like a tough one though.

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

You don’t match my shams.

Have you ever read it? My ex-boyfriend and I took a copy on a trip home to see his parents. I read it aloud in my Cosmo-est voice, and we couldn’t stop laughing.

sigh.[/quote]

How can you be certain that I don’t match your shams? [/quote]

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

You don’t match my shams.

Have you ever read it? My ex-boyfriend and I took a copy on a trip home to see his parents. I read it aloud in my Cosmo-est voice, and we couldn’t stop laughing.

sigh.[/quote]

How can you be certain that I don’t match your shams? [/quote]

[/quote]

We obviously would never work. It’s ticking me off just looking at it. I’m demanding that you go fix it. fix it now!

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

You don’t match my shams.

Have you ever read it? My ex-boyfriend and I took a copy on a trip home to see his parents. I read it aloud in my Cosmo-est voice, and we couldn’t stop laughing.

sigh.[/quote]

How can you be certain that I don’t match your shams? [/quote]

[/quote]

We obviously would never work. It’s ticking me off just looking at it. I’m demanding that you go fix it. fix it now![/quote]

I will. WHEN THE MIDDLE RUNS OUT. Not before!

“And to quote Gloria Steinham, a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.”

REALLY?

Men built this world and (almost) everything in it, men only need a woman because of natures way of levelling the testosterone through sexual conquest in a placating sort of way. Angry, t-filled young men with no outlet smells like prison.

And then we have the shaming articles asking why guys prefer porn, PUA and games when it comes down to commitment. So women dont need men? Sounds like somebody got blasted in the face by one too many athletes during her prime.

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

You don’t match my shams.

Have you ever read it? My ex-boyfriend and I took a copy on a trip home to see his parents. I read it aloud in my Cosmo-est voice, and we couldn’t stop laughing.

sigh.[/quote]

How can you be certain that I don’t match your shams? [/quote]

[/quote]

I don’t understand the middle squeezers. It makes no sense. It is far more efficient to squeeze from the bottom and roll as you empty the tube.

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

You don’t match my shams.

Have you ever read it? My ex-boyfriend and I took a copy on a trip home to see his parents. I read it aloud in my Cosmo-est voice, and we couldn’t stop laughing.

sigh.[/quote]

How can you be certain that I don’t match your shams? [/quote]

[/quote]

I don’t understand the middle squeezers. It makes no sense. It is far more efficient to squeeze from the bottom and roll as you empty the tube. [/quote]

That is one of those paradoxical differences between men and women that contributes to human symbiosis. They squeeze from the middle, we fix it by leaving the cap on and squeezing out the dent from the bottom, then roll it up. We in turn gain a sense of purpose and accomplishment which supports our drive to reproduce.

If they didn’t do that our species would die out in one generation.

[quote]harrypotter wrote:
“And to quote Gloria Steinham, a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.”

REALLY?

Men built this world and (almost) everything in it, men only need a woman because of natures way of levelling the testosterone through sexual conquest in a placating sort of way. Angry, t-filled young men with no outlet smells like prison.

And then we have the shaming articles asking why guys prefer porn, PUA and games when it comes down to commitment. So women dont need men? Sounds like somebody got blasted in the face by one too many athletes during her prime.[/quote]

C’mon man.

I’m not a fan of what usually passes for feminism these days and I agree that there is a lot of stupid, short sighted negativity toward men and masculinity, but all this chest thumping is a little ridiculous.

A woman living in the West today does not need a man in the sense that she is viably able to support herself financially, professionally and socially as an independent entity. Marriage is not urgently necessary for her survival and is instead a matter of choice and personal preference, as it should be for everyone.

This is a good thing. I’m grateful that my daughter will have the opportunity to grow up in such a world. I don’t see how this threatens or insults men in any way. In fact, I would far sooner be (and am) with woman who can stand on her own feet and is with me because she prefers to be than a woman who is wholly dependent on me for her survival and emotional well being. Who wouldn’t?

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]jbpick86 wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

You don’t match my shams.

Have you ever read it? My ex-boyfriend and I took a copy on a trip home to see his parents. I read it aloud in my Cosmo-est voice, and we couldn’t stop laughing.

sigh.[/quote]

How can you be certain that I don’t match your shams? [/quote]

[/quote]

I don’t understand the middle squeezers. It makes no sense. It is far more efficient to squeeze from the bottom and roll as you empty the tube. [/quote]

That is one of those paradoxical differences between men and women that contributes to human symbiosis. They squeeze from the middle, we fix it by leaving the cap on and squeezing out the dent from the bottom, then roll it up. We in turn gain a sense of purpose and accomplishment which supports our drive to reproduce.

If they didn’t do that our species would die out in one generation.
[/quote]

lol… true story.

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

The small sampling of men I’ve gone out with seem to say the same thing. Getting laid isn’t a problem, or at least I don’t think it would be if they looked for women who do that freely. It’s finding someone with whom you’d want to read in front of a fire, someone you want to have around your kids, someone with whom you’d like to wake, fool around, and then cook breakfast.

[/quote]

I think there is something to that. Friday night I went out with my buddies with the intention of looking for some tail. I could have easily gotten laid but in the end I decided against it. I’ve been really conflicted lately. I’ve always enjoyed playing the field and have done everything in my power to avoid true commitment. I guess I just don’t really know what the advantages are to being with just woman. I’ve been actually thinking about posting a thread on this very topic.[/quote]

You should. I only know the advantages of being with one man. [/quote]

Maybe I could get one to cook and clean for me?[/quote]

Preferably one that likes to wear black and silver so she will match my kitchen appliances. [/quote]

The sexy time stuff is all good, but don’t you want someone who is in some ways your equal or superior, capable of challenging or even besting you in some way?

I can’t stand fembots. A woman should have some intellectual characteristics that you can look at and say “Damn, she’s good”.
[/quote]

I was just kidding around. I’m not going to lie, I would love for my girl to be all domestic and shit but I’m looking for more than just that. I’m looking for a chick that is intelligent, highly educated, witty, beautiful, has a smokin’ hot body, grounded and humble, takes care of herself, has a professional job earning at least 50K a year, great sense of humor, is not overly materialistic, is freak in the bedroom yet classy outside of, reads and learns from Cosmo, has a sexy voice, preferably 5’4"-5’5", has long blonde or brunette hair, squeezes her toothpaste from the end never the middle, honest, values her friends and family, no tattoos, likes to have fun, doesn’t tan b/c melanoma isn’t sexy, 34B or 34C because more than a handful is just a waste, thoughtful, isn’t high maintenance, is good at cooking and baking, romantic, adventurous, doesn’t use a ton of profanity, gives a great massage, doesn’t have kids, sweet and caring, doesn’t own a ferret because that is just fucking weird, feminine yet isn’t afraid of getting dirty, drinks beer, with masculine interests. That is all I could come up with off the top of my head, I’m sure there is a lot more. Am I really asking for too much?[/quote]
“wish in one hand and shit in the other”

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

The small sampling of men I’ve gone out with seem to say the same thing. Getting laid isn’t a problem, or at least I don’t think it would be if they looked for women who do that freely. It’s finding someone with whom you’d want to read in front of a fire, someone you want to have around your kids, someone with whom you’d like to wake, fool around, and then cook breakfast.

[/quote]

I think there is something to that. Friday night I went out with my buddies with the intention of looking for some tail. I could have easily gotten laid but in the end I decided against it. I’ve been really conflicted lately. I’ve always enjoyed playing the field and have done everything in my power to avoid true commitment. I guess I just don’t really know what the advantages are to being with just woman. I’ve been actually thinking about posting a thread on this very topic.[/quote]

You should. I only know the advantages of being with one man. [/quote]

Maybe I could get one to cook and clean for me?[/quote]

Preferably one that likes to wear black and silver so she will match my kitchen appliances. [/quote]

The sexy time stuff is all good, but don’t you want someone who is in some ways your equal or superior, capable of challenging or even besting you in some way?

I can’t stand fembots. A woman should have some intellectual characteristics that you can look at and say “Damn, she’s good”.
[/quote]

I was just kidding around. I’m not going to lie, I would love for my girl to be all domestic and shit but I’m looking for more than just that. I’m looking for a chick that is intelligent, highly educated, witty, beautiful, has a smokin’ hot body, grounded and humble, takes care of herself, has a professional job earning at least 50K a year, great sense of humor, is not overly materialistic, is freak in the bedroom yet classy outside of, reads and learns from Cosmo, has a sexy voice, preferably 5’4"-5’5", has long blonde or brunette hair, squeezes her toothpaste from the end never the middle, honest, values her friends and family, no tattoos, likes to have fun, doesn’t tan b/c melanoma isn’t sexy, 34B or 34C because more than a handful is just a waste, thoughtful, isn’t high maintenance, is good at cooking and baking, romantic, adventurous, doesn’t use a ton of profanity, gives a great massage, doesn’t have kids, sweet and caring, doesn’t own a ferret because that is just fucking weird, feminine yet isn’t afraid of getting dirty, drinks beer, with masculine interests. That is all I could come up with off the top of my head, I’m sure there is a lot more. Am I really asking for too much?[/quote]

You left out one very important feature.

She has to be willing and able to put up with all of your bullshit. Good luck finding that.

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

[quote]EmilyQ wrote:

The small sampling of men I’ve gone out with seem to say the same thing. Getting laid isn’t a problem, or at least I don’t think it would be if they looked for women who do that freely. It’s finding someone with whom you’d want to read in front of a fire, someone you want to have around your kids, someone with whom you’d like to wake, fool around, and then cook breakfast.

[/quote]

I think there is something to that. Friday night I went out with my buddies with the intention of looking for some tail. I could have easily gotten laid but in the end I decided against it. I’ve been really conflicted lately. I’ve always enjoyed playing the field and have done everything in my power to avoid true commitment. I guess I just don’t really know what the advantages are to being with just woman. I’ve been actually thinking about posting a thread on this very topic.[/quote]

You should. I only know the advantages of being with one man. [/quote]

Maybe I could get one to cook and clean for me?[/quote]

Preferably one that likes to wear black and silver so she will match my kitchen appliances. [/quote]

The sexy time stuff is all good, but don’t you want someone who is in some ways your equal or superior, capable of challenging or even besting you in some way?

I can’t stand fembots. A woman should have some intellectual characteristics that you can look at and say “Damn, she’s good”.
[/quote]

I was just kidding around. I’m not going to lie, I would love for my girl to be all domestic and shit but I’m looking for more than just that. I’m looking for a chick that is intelligent, highly educated, witty, beautiful, has a smokin’ hot body, grounded and humble, takes care of herself, has a professional job earning at least 50K a year, great sense of humor, is not overly materialistic, is freak in the bedroom yet classy outside of, reads and learns from Cosmo, has a sexy voice, preferably 5’4"-5’5", has long blonde or brunette hair, squeezes her toothpaste from the end never the middle, honest, values her friends and family, no tattoos, likes to have fun, doesn’t tan b/c melanoma isn’t sexy, 34B or 34C because more than a handful is just a waste, thoughtful, isn’t high maintenance, is good at cooking and baking, romantic, adventurous, doesn’t use a ton of profanity, gives a great massage, doesn’t have kids, sweet and caring, doesn’t own a ferret because that is just fucking weird, feminine yet isn’t afraid of getting dirty, drinks beer, with masculine interests. That is all I could come up with off the top of my head, I’m sure there is a lot more. Am I really asking for too much?[/quote]

You left out one very important feature.

She has to be willing and able to put up with all of your bullshit. Good luck finding that.[/quote]

Are you kidding? She would feel privileged.

Sturg, how do you squeeze your toothpaste?

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

Sturg, how do you squeeze your toothpaste?[/quote]

I’m a bit neurotic so I actually use a toothpaste roller thingy, like the one pictured above.

[quote]WhiteSturgeon wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

Sturg, how do you squeeze your toothpaste?[/quote]

I’m a bit neurotic so I actually use a toothpaste roller thingy, like the one pictured above. [/quote]

I think we’ve established that women squeeze the tube in the middle and men squeeze it from the bottom, which is the sensible way. For me this just reinforces my suspicions that you’re actually a dude. Because not only are you squeezing from the bottom but you’re using a tool to maximize efficiency. So not only are you a man. You are a megggggaaaaaa man.

[quote]WhiteSturgeon wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

Sturg, how do you squeeze your toothpaste?[/quote]

I’m a bit neurotic so I actually use a toothpaste roller thingy, like the one pictured above. [/quote]

Jesus, I used to run the tube over a hard straight edge to get the same result. This is a revelation. It also kinda pisses me off that I didn’t think of it.

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]WhiteSturgeon wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

Sturg, how do you squeeze your toothpaste?[/quote]

I’m a bit neurotic so I actually use a toothpaste roller thingy, like the one pictured above. [/quote]

Jesus, I used to run the tube over a hard straight edge to get the same result. This is a revelation. It also kinda pisses me off that I didn’t think of it. [/quote]

I use a toothbrush handle as a squeegee to force the remainder up the tube. Hard to believe people are so OCD about this.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]Testy1 wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]WhiteSturgeon wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

Sturg, how do you squeeze your toothpaste?[/quote]

I’m a bit neurotic so I actually use a toothpaste roller thingy, like the one pictured above. [/quote]

Jesus, I used to run the tube over a hard straight edge to get the same result. This is a revelation. It also kinda pisses me off that I didn’t think of it. [/quote]

I use a toothbrush handle as a squeegee to force the remainder up the tube. Hard to believe people are so OCD about this.[/quote]

I agree. It’s easier to just beat it with a hammer.[/quote]

That just moves the paste around in the tube. You’ll be hammering for hours to get it right.

[quote]WhiteSturgeon wrote:

[quote]The Other Titan wrote:

Sturg, how do you squeeze your toothpaste?[/quote]

I’m a bit neurotic so I actually use a toothpaste roller thingy, like the one pictured above. [/quote]

Well that’s not too neurotic. You still have waste. Palm against the edge of the sink gets all the toothpaste to the front and takes less than a second. Just don’t do it to hard or the top flies off and toothpaste comes out.