[quote]RoadWarrior wrote:
[center]McCain - Palin 2008[/center][/quote]
There’s Sloth and Me. We’re the guys in the hoods.
[quote]RoadWarrior wrote:
[center]McCain - Palin 2008[/center][/quote]
There’s Sloth and Me. We’re the guys in the hoods.
[quote]RoadWarrior wrote:
Your attitude is a perfect example of why your argument
doesn’t work. The USA doesn’t need any more people as stupid as you.
[/quote]
Uneducated people are not necessarily stupid. Intelligent people understand that.
If you want to call me stupid you should at least have the decency to support your ideas with more than ad hominem attacks. Are you one of the people that should have been pushing a broom or mowing a lawn instead of sitting in a class room?
What right does anyone have to steal from my children to give to someone else’s children?
[quote]RoadWarrior wrote:
<<<< Your attitude is a perfect example of why your argument
doesn’t work. The USA doesn’t need any more people as stupid as you.
[/quote]
He’s intellectually undisciplined and impulsive, but not stupid.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
RoadWarrior wrote:
<<<< Your attitude is a perfect example of why your argument
doesn’t work. The USA doesn’t need any more people as stupid as you.
He’s intellectually undisciplined …[/quote]
Please explain what that means.
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Tiribulus wrote:
RoadWarrior wrote:
<<<< Your attitude is a perfect example of why your argument
doesn’t work. The USA doesn’t need any more people as stupid as you.
He’s intellectually undisciplined …
Please explain what that means.
[/quote]
You are all over the place.
From communism to anarchist to whatever the fuck you are now.
You make up your own definitions when the need arises.
Plain and simple, you are an idiot. Maybe not stupid, but definitely an idiot.
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Tiribulus wrote:
RoadWarrior wrote:
<<<< Your attitude is a perfect example of why your argument
doesn’t work. The USA doesn’t need any more people as stupid as you.
He’s intellectually undisciplined …
Please explain what that means.
[/quote]
Intelligence is the ability to acquire and accurately comprehend information. I believe you have a decent dose of that.
Intellectual discipline is the ability to recognize when one may not yet be in possession of sufficient and accurately comprehended information to warrant a secure and defensible conclusion. You are lacking in that as many younger people are.
Here’s tip. Never ever be afraid to fully hear opposing positions. If you are it betrays a lack of confidence in your own. Opposing positions, acquired and accurately comprehended will either give you the opportunity to revise your views or confirm the ones you presently hold. It is however wisest to suspend judgment until all relevant information is brought to bear on a position.
You are at this moment defending conclusions that I can’t help believing you will one day look back at with a self deprecating chuckle.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
Intellectual discipline is the ability to recognize when one may not yet be in possession of sufficient and accurately comprehended information to warrant a secure and defensible conclusion.[/quote]
If I lacked the ability to recognize that I was not in “possession of sufficient and accurately comprehended information” – as you put it – maybe that means I am not making myself understood and thus you just must be confused?
[quote]
Here’s tip. Never ever be afraid to fully hear opposing positions. blah. blah[/quote]
How would I know they were opposing positions unless I heard them first? Why would I be afraid to listen to them?
[quote]
You are at this moment defending conclusions that I can’t help believing you will one day look back at with a self deprecating chuckle.[/quote]
In my near 4 decades of life you are the first person to tell me that; and you’re in luck because patronizing someone is a good way to make them see the invalidity of their position and…ha ha…I have seen the light.
…and I don’t typically laugh when I learn something new.
Shit! What were we talking about…?
[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
<<< If I lacked the ability to recognize that I was not in “possession of sufficient and accurately comprehended information” – as you put it – maybe that means I am not making myself understood and thus you just must be confused? >>>[/quote]
I hope so.
And don’t misunderstand. I have a higher regard for you overall than it may sound like sometimes, but I honestly would’ve never guessed you were that old. I couldn’t come up with a less condescending way to say what I did so I just said it.