I agree with your point that not every champion needs to be World Class in every area of MMA.
But, does anyone really consider Forrest to be a great champion? Or even in the discussion for best P4P UFC fighter? Does anyone consider Sherk in that discussion?
If you want to put McGregor in the same category with Forrest Griffin I don’t think you are doing your own argument any favors and I actually feel that’s a disservice to Conor.
Tito? Ok, maybe a fair comparison, though again, I don’t think Tito is on anybody’s list of even top 10 (maybe not even top 20) best UFC champions (let alone best P4P).
If you are going to make an argument for Conor’s greatness, then you need to compare him to other great champions/P4P contenders.
BJ Penn? No way, dude had World Champion level BJJ, some of the best takedown defense the sport has ever seen, a granite chin, and according to Freddie Roach some of the best boxing he’s seen in MMA.
GSP? Nope. World class takedown and wrestling skills, high level submission skills (though perhaps not on Penn’s level), solid striking skills.
Aldo? Nope again. Some of the best striking skills the sport has seen, great takedown defense, Black Belt in BJJ (though he chose to rarely use it, which I see as more of a stylistic choice than a weakness of skill). Yes, Conor beat him, but, not only was that well into Aldo’s career (and let’s be honest, Father Time had some influence on that outcome as did prior injuries; had that fight happened earlier in Aldo’s career it may have gone very differently). Also, styles make fights. Dennis Hallman beat Matt Hughes twice within the first round. But Dennis Hallman isn’t even in the same ballpark as Matt Hughes in terms of overall fighting skill or greatness.
Anderson Silva? Nope.
Hughes? Still nope.
Randy? Mmmm, maaaaybe. But, although Randy was not a kick boxer the caliber of Aldo or Silva, he was masterful at striking from the Clinch (“dirty boxing”) and from the ground, had high level
submission skills, and some of the best Greco and control on the ground the sport has ever seen. In fact, he is probably the best dirty boxer that has ever fought in MMA. And although he had his share of losses, he at least defended each Belt and had a higher overall level of competition than Conor has had up to this point.
Liddell? Again, maybe. Chuck was pretty much a striker, but, he had great takedown defense so was able to nullify and keep the fight standing against just about everyone who stood in front of him (only Randy was able to take him down repeatedly). But, I wouldn’t necessarily disagree with putting Conor and Chuck in the same category. Again, the only thing that I think gives Chuck the nod is level of competition and number of title defenses. But again, I’m ok with putting those two on the same level for now.
Jones or Mighty Mouse? Hilarious.
I foresee McGregor retiring after this Mayweather fight (unless Floyd “takes a fall” so they can sell the rematch/rubber match) or if he does ever defend his UFC belt being protected for as long as possible. So I don’t think he’ll ever have a long enough career to be considered as an all time great, even if he does round out his skills.
Just my opinion though.

