Man Says He'll Kill Son's Murderer

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
One of the definitions of “serial killer” is one who kills at least 3 people in no-consecutive order. Dahmer waited 9 years between his first and second victims. This guy, if not put away, would have slowly escelated his monsterish behavior and more children would’ve gone missing.

What’s wrong with this guy can’t be fixed by time, or abuse, or rape, or whatever. He needs to be put down like a rabid dog, 'cause for all intents and purposes that’s what he is. And, I agree that the father shouldn’t be telling the media [or anyone] that he intends to kill Woodmanese whether he intends to actually do it or not.

But, I hope that revenge is exacted and Woodmanese dies a death 10x more gruesome than the child he murdered, and the local police somehow turn a blind eye to the situation and let it fade away.[/quote]

I agree with you, but honestly I don’t think people like this killer feel things the way you and I do, and thus I don’t think theres any real gain in torturing them before you off them.

Honestly, this story wasn’t that bad. The kid was stabbed once and died. The kid who did it polished his bones and then tried to strangle someone else 9 years later. The killer was clearly an emotional abnormality where there is no line between “I wonder” and “dead”. Which is different than the sadistic abnormalities.

Much worse happens in the streets of major cities all the time.

Also, if you were to kill someone like this, the cleanest way would be with some form of poison. It doesn’t have to be a nice one, either. Just situation yourself somewhere in his life and find the right time. I honestly think a jury would be more forgiving of the father gunning him, though.

Whoop dee do… a kid died over 30 years ago, big deal. Kids are dropping like flies all over africa, suffering from starvation, illness, homelessness etc. not to mention the atrocities like rape and ethnic cleansing going on in the congo happening against them, I dont see anyone comin up with a SpecOps plan (or whatever homo revenge fantasies some of you half-literate morons like to come up with in your spare time) in getting them justice.

Some of you need to stop embarassing yourselves since none of you (referring to the ones who seriously say they would kill this guy) would have the balls to do anything about this killer, and I say this based off the majority of the views i’ve read on other websites condoning vigilante justice against this guy. We would have pedophiles/child killers falling dead all over the country if everyone went through with whatt they said.

Besides, You dont know this guy, for all you know hes become an upstanding, church-going guy who feels deep remorse but just doesn’t know how to show it yet, since he has a history of mental illness and being anti-social.

[quote]WWEAttitude wrote:
Whoop dee do… a kid died over 30 years ago, big deal. Kids are dropping like flies all over africa, suffering from starvation, illness, homelessness etc. not to mention the atrocities like rape and ethnic cleansing going on in the congo happening against them, I dont see anyone comin up with a SpecOps plan (or whatever homo revenge fantasies some of you half-literate morons like to come up with in your spare time) in getting them justice.

Some of you need to stop embarassing yourselves since none of you (referring to the ones who seriously say they would kill this guy) would have the balls to do anything about this killer, and I say this based off the majority of the views i’ve read on other websites condoning vigilante justice against this guy. We would have pedophiles/child killers falling dead all over the country if everyone went through with whatt they said.

Besides, You dont know this guy, for all you know hes become an upstanding, church-going guy who feels deep remorse but just doesn’t know how to show it yet, since he has a history of mental illness and being anti-social. [/quote]

Are you a parent? I will take a wild guess and say no. Until you are you have no idea what a parent would do.

its disturbing that there are people like that running around … you’d think his psychiatrist should have told someone about his “i wonder what it would be like to kill someone” thoughts

Watch the film “In the Bedroom”. It’s not an action film like “Law Abiding Citizen”, and it’s not an award winning blockbuster. It’s a dramatic window into the minds of educated, upper middle class parents whose son was senselessly murdered.

And Marisa Tomei is braless.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
Quietly wait for his release ( I would be quite happy he was coming home to me ) and wait for him to settle into a residence. I’d dig the grave deep in the woods. And then plot his abduction with the precision of a Navy Seal team op. And then it’s him and me, in the woods, with time on our hands. Lots of time. Lots of torture. Water boarding would seem like a day in the sun at the local water park. I wouldn’t cut fingers. I’d cut pieces of fingers. He would die by 10,000 cuts, bruises and blows, all exacerbated by whatever chemical that would increase the pain. I would keep him alive for as long as possible. As long as possible. Him and me…in the woods.

That’s assuming I let him make it out of prison in the first place. [/quote]

You and I think alike.

I wouldn’t care what anyone on this board or in general society thought of me in regards to debasing myself to his level. He would plead for the fires of hell to take him away from me.

But I don’t think I’d bury him. There a plenty of wolves and bears in my mountains that would feast on his miserable remains.

[/quote]

Debase? I’d consider it my duty. And I wouldn’t lose a moment’s sleep about it. Is there a way you could get the wolves and bears to feast upon him each night and then stop it before he is killed? :slight_smile:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]Dre the Hatchet wrote:
But yeah, nothing is gained from dwelling in revenge fantasies, that won’t make the kid alive again.
Also, if you sadistically murder a guy like this, what separates you from him?[/quote]

That’s an easy one - in the one case the guilty kills the innocent. In the other the innocent kills the guilty.

This isn’t advanced calculus, my friend. Why struggle?[/quote]

FTW

[quote]Oleena wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
One of the definitions of “serial killer” is one who kills at least 3 people in no-consecutive order. Dahmer waited 9 years between his first and second victims. This guy, if not put away, would have slowly escelated his monsterish behavior and more children would’ve gone missing.

What’s wrong with this guy can’t be fixed by time, or abuse, or rape, or whatever. He needs to be put down like a rabid dog, 'cause for all intents and purposes that’s what he is. And, I agree that the father shouldn’t be telling the media [or anyone] that he intends to kill Woodmanese whether he intends to actually do it or not.

But, I hope that revenge is exacted and Woodmanese dies a death 10x more gruesome than the child he murdered, and the local police somehow turn a blind eye to the situation and let it fade away.[/quote]

I agree with you, but honestly I don’t think people like this killer feel things the way you and I do, and thus I don’t think theres any real gain in torturing them before you off them.

Honestly, this story wasn’t that bad. The kid was stabbed once and died. The kid who did it polished his bones and then tried to strangle someone else 9 years later. The killer was clearly an emotional abnormality where there is no line between “I wonder” and “dead”. Which is different than the sadistic abnormalities.

Much worse happens in the streets of major cities all the time.
[/quote]

Can you please kill yourself? Not that bad? How bad does it have to be when you’re willing to stab a 5 YEAR OLD IN THE CHEST you fucking dip shit? What the fuck do you know about what happens in major cities other than what you read? What a fucking dip shit you are for real. I’m sorry you dip shit, although they drop bodies within blocks and on the same block near where I am on a daily basis, I can’t recall a 5 year old being stabbed. It must be so fucking common, that I’ve become immune to it…you’re right, it aint that bad I guess. You fucking moron.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]Oleena wrote:

…Honestly, this story wasn’t that bad. The kid was stabbed once and died…
[/quote]

Yeah, I see what you mean.

No big deal here.

/thread[/quote]

It’s better than getting sexually and physically abused for a while and then eventually dying of injuries. Or even starved and beaten on a regular basis. One stab wound that instantly kills is also better than 5+ that take a while.

I think what shocks people is the inhumanity of the guy who did it; his emotion processing is so off. Not saying he shouldn’t go; just saying this story shouldn’t be a shocker.

[quote]Oleena wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
One of the definitions of “serial killer” is one who kills at least 3 people in no-consecutive order. Dahmer waited 9 years between his first and second victims. This guy, if not put away, would have slowly escelated his monsterish behavior and more children would’ve gone missing.

What’s wrong with this guy can’t be fixed by time, or abuse, or rape, or whatever. He needs to be put down like a rabid dog, 'cause for all intents and purposes that’s what he is. And, I agree that the father shouldn’t be telling the media [or anyone] that he intends to kill Woodmanese whether he intends to actually do it or not.

But, I hope that revenge is exacted and Woodmanese dies a death 10x more gruesome than the child he murdered, and the local police somehow turn a blind eye to the situation and let it fade away.[/quote]

I agree with you, but honestly I don’t think people like this killer feel things the way you and I do, and thus I don’t think theres any real gain in torturing them before you off them.

Honestly, this story wasn’t that bad. The kid was stabbed once and died. The kid who did it polished his bones and then tried to strangle someone else 9 years later. The killer was clearly an emotional abnormality where there is no line between “I wonder” and “dead”. Which is different than the sadistic abnormalities.

Much worse happens in the streets of major cities all the time.
[/quote]

Cunt.

[quote]WWEAttitude wrote:
Whoop dee do… a kid died over 30 years ago, big deal. Kids are dropping like flies all over africa, suffering from starvation, illness, homelessness etc. not to mention the atrocities like rape and ethnic cleansing going on in the congo happening against them, I dont see anyone comin up with a SpecOps plan (or whatever homo revenge fantasies some of you half-literate morons like to come up with in your spare time) in getting them justice.

Some of you need to stop embarassing yourselves since none of you (referring to the ones who seriously say they would kill this guy) would have the balls to do anything about this killer, and I say this based off the majority of the views i’ve read on other websites condoning vigilante justice against this guy. We would have pedophiles/child killers falling dead all over the country if everyone went through with whatt they said.

Besides, You dont know this guy, for all you know hes become an upstanding, church-going guy who feels deep remorse but just doesn’t know how to show it yet, since he has a history of mental illness and being anti-social. [/quote]

Not that i expected an intelligent post from someone called “WWE attitude”… but this is laughable.

what’s wrong with having pedophiles/child killers dropping dead all over the place?

sounds like an improvement to me

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]Oleena wrote:

[quote]WhiteFlash wrote:
One of the definitions of “serial killer” is one who kills at least 3 people in no-consecutive order. Dahmer waited 9 years between his first and second victims. This guy, if not put away, would have slowly escelated his monsterish behavior and more children would’ve gone missing.

What’s wrong with this guy can’t be fixed by time, or abuse, or rape, or whatever. He needs to be put down like a rabid dog, 'cause for all intents and purposes that’s what he is. And, I agree that the father shouldn’t be telling the media [or anyone] that he intends to kill Woodmanese whether he intends to actually do it or not.

But, I hope that revenge is exacted and Woodmanese dies a death 10x more gruesome than the child he murdered, and the local police somehow turn a blind eye to the situation and let it fade away.[/quote]

I agree with you, but honestly I don’t think people like this killer feel things the way you and I do, and thus I don’t think theres any real gain in torturing them before you off them.

Honestly, this story wasn’t that bad. The kid was stabbed once and died. The kid who did it polished his bones and then tried to strangle someone else 9 years later. The killer was clearly an emotional abnormality where there is no line between “I wonder” and “dead”. Which is different than the sadistic abnormalities.

Much worse happens in the streets of major cities all the time.
[/quote]

Cunt.[/quote]

You probably have several individuals living in your neighborhood who are more sadistic than this guy. Why don’t you save your breath on me, hit up the google search, and be the big guy you claim to be on here?

Pussy?

Also, the guy who said this dude might repent and go to Church has obviously never encountered a person like this. I doubt the killer will ever see what he did as more than a way to pass an afternoon. He was mainly scared of what people might do to him if found out.

Okay, so what I’m seeing here is a lot of understandable anger at the situation.

…and yet the majority of you are all talking about how much you’d torture and murder the guy? LOL. Hypocrisy is amazing.

It’s really not within ANY human’s rights to end the life of any other human, simply put. We are all put on this Earth with the same exact biological rights… ACCORDING to our sociologically-formed viewpoint.

Yes, when we ultimately boil what we are down to its coarsest form we are all stupid animals, going around and killing each other.

But if we’re going to try to pretend like we’re different than any other animal and form councils, societies, and communities then perhaps we should be operating by only one set of standards. So… we’re not supposed to kill people unless a person sitting behind a podium decides it’s to be? Isn’t that a little, erm, contradictory?

Two wrongs =/= One right

So I’ll leave with this, seeking this man’s death in any way makes you a pure hypocrite. Not to say what he did wasn’t detestable, but I find it funny that people can be so painfully oblivious to the verbal garbage they spew.

*Also, please spare me the parent thing. I’m not a parent, I get it though, you’d do anything for your kid. Cool. Still doesn’t mean you’re not a hypocrite.

[quote]SSC wrote:
Okay, so what I’m seeing here is a lot of understandable anger at the situation.

…and yet the majority of you are all talking about how much you’d torture and murder the guy? LOL. Hypocrisy is amazing.

It’s really not within ANY human’s rights to end the life of any other human, simply put. We are all put on this Earth with the same exact biological rights… ACCORDING to our sociologically-formed viewpoint.

Yes, when we ultimately boil what we are down to its coarsest form we are all stupid animals, going around and killing each other.

But if we’re going to try to pretend like we’re different than any other animal and form councils, societies, and communities then perhaps we should be operating by only one set of standards. So… we’re not supposed to kill people unless a person sitting behind a podium decides it’s to be? Isn’t that a little, erm, contradictory?

Two wrongs =/= One right

So I’ll leave with this, seeking this man’s death in any way makes you a pure hypocrite. Not to say what he did wasn’t detestable, but I find it funny that people can be so painfully oblivious to the verbal garbage they spew.

*Also, please spare me the parent thing. I’m not a parent, I get it though, you’d do anything for your kid. Cool. Still doesn’t mean you’re not a hypocrite.[/quote]

people who kill other people should be locked up until they’re dead, since they’re a danger to others.

i don’t know why you think all of us go around killing each other… that’s not normal

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
Quietly wait for his release ( I would be quite happy he was coming home to me ) and wait for him to settle into a residence. I’d dig the grave deep in the woods. And then plot his abduction with the precision of a Navy Seal team op. And then it’s him and me, in the woods, with time on our hands. Lots of time. Lots of torture. Water boarding would seem like a day in the sun at the local water park. I wouldn’t cut fingers. I’d cut pieces of fingers. He would die by 10,000 cuts, bruises and blows, all exacerbated by whatever chemical that would increase the pain. I would keep him alive for as long as possible. As long as possible. Him and me…in the woods.

That’s assuming I let him make it out of prison in the first place. [/quote]

That reminds me of that torture scene in Law Abiding Citizen… and some torture scenes in Unthinkable.