[quote]Bauer97 wrote:
CaliforniaLaw wrote:
Funny. You know those sites like “Hot Chicks With Douche Bags” and “The Dirty”? They’re always making fun of the d-bags. Guys on here will join in.
Does anyone stop to realize that the d-bags are with hot chicks? So maybe they have something figured out?
I am not on the market. But I know what when I wear d-bag shirts (the kind with graphics/writing on them), I get way more female attention. I think Ed Hardy is a scam,. Chicks dig that stuff, though.
Something to consider.
Indeed. However, my contention is this: The type of female who would suddenly throw herself at a guy based on the stupid graphic he has on his “Affliction” t-shirt (I just learned what Affliction t-shirts are this past month…) is a brain-dead drone of a female. Granted, she may be hot, but do you really want to date a female who bases her choices in men solely on the brand of clothing he wears?
[/quote]
Solely on the brand of clothing he wears?
Gee, can’t you make it more black and white? lol
First impressions count in the business, romantic, and pretty much every other world. It’s a fact of life.
Chances are that you don’t usually approach the ugliest girl in the room for a date. Is that any less petty than judging someone based on what they wear?
I don’t care about any particular name brand but I guarantee you that I do care how a woman dresses. If she is single and in the market she better be wearing clothes and fixing her hair in a way that is sexy and appealing… not necessarily practical.
This means that she will have to spend a little more money on clothing and take longer in the mornings to make sure she looks spot on.
Later down the road, and I mean decades later, she can consider buying her clothes at the supermarket because it’s cheap, durable, and practical.