I’m not saying it’s absurd to find her attractive, different strokes and all that, but it is pretty ridiculous to just throw her name out there as a universal standard for what constitutes an attractive person.
Finding Maggie Gylenhalealal desirable is like eating an entire quart of ice cream over the kitchen sink by the light of your refrigerator (and not just because her face resembles a bowl of B&J’s Chunky Monkey left out a tad too long at air temperature): you know it’s wrong, you wish you could stop, but it strangely feels too good to quit… but never should you ever run around insisting to people that it’s a reasonable thing to do.[/quote]
Who in the world said she was “a universal standard for what constitutes an attractive person,” lol. People in this thread were making comments about how she is straight up ugly and “backing it up” by posting the absolute worst pictures of her. There is abundant evidence that even those generally considered “hot” can look “ugly” in some pictures, just the same as less attractive people like Maggie can look downright horrible in some photos. No one said she is hot, my main point was that the comments calling her ugly, and a dog, are not warranted and that she is probably not below most men’s honest standards.[/quote]
She lookd hideous throughtout entire movies.
Movies in which she is supposed to be beautiful.
She’s a good actress and maybe a nice lady…
But she’s a fucking dog.
(Which isn’t to say she can’t get laid)
I’m not saying it’s absurd to find her attractive, different strokes and all that, but it is pretty ridiculous to just throw her name out there as a universal standard for what constitutes an attractive person.
Finding Maggie Gylenhalealal desirable is like eating an entire quart of ice cream over the kitchen sink by the light of your refrigerator (and not just because her face resembles a bowl of B&J’s Chunky Monkey left out a tad too long at air temperature): you know it’s wrong, you wish you could stop, but it strangely feels too good to quit… but never should you ever run around insisting to people that it’s a reasonable thing to do.[/quote]
Who in the world said she was “a universal standard for what constitutes an attractive person,” lol. People in this thread were making comments about how she is straight up ugly and “backing it up” by posting the absolute worst pictures of her. There is abundant evidence that even those generally considered “hot” can look “ugly” in some pictures, just the same as less attractive people like Maggie can look downright horrible in some photos. No one said she is hot, my main point was that the comments calling her ugly, and a dog, are not warranted and that she is probably not below most men’s honest standards.[/quote]
I’m going to argue that what you showed was not other actresses looking ugle just unmade up. They still had a cuteness in them that was clear. Most of the pics just looked like they woke up and put on a hat and walked outside. I mean I look like that first thing in the morning and I’m a Freaking Studmaster X.
But Gylenhall in Batman was a downgrade. I kept wondering why are they fighting over her, then noticed how batman was moving so slow when he got to the building that blew up with her inside. yeahhhh mistake my azz.
[quote]four60 wrote:
But Gylenhall in Batman was a downgrade. I kept wondering why are they fighting over her, then noticed how batman was moving so slow when he got to the building that blew up with her inside. yeahhhh mistake my azz.
[/quote]
[quote]four60 wrote:
But Gylenhall in Batman was a downgrade. I kept wondering why are they fighting over her, then noticed how batman was moving so slow when he got to the building that blew up with her inside. yeahhhh mistake my azz.
[/quote]
I thought batman chose to save Harvey Dent?[/quote]
[quote]kingbeef323 wrote:
You’ve got to be kidding me… She doesn’t look bad at all. This is “e-standards” at it’s finest.[/quote]
Wow…then check out my profile…see what an ugly bastard I am, and take my word for it that I’ve dated a lot of girls that are much more beautiful than Maggie Gyylenhaal.
[quote]kingbeef323 wrote:
Who in the world said she was “a universal standard for what constitutes an attractive person,” lol. People in this thread were making comments about how she is straight up ugly and “backing it up” by posting the absolute worst pictures of her. There is abundant evidence that even those generally considered “hot” can look “ugly” in some pictures, just the same as less attractive people like Maggie can look downright horrible in some photos. No one said she is hot, my main point was that the comments calling her ugly, and a dog, are not warranted and that she is probably not below most men’s honest standards.[/quote]
I couldn’t agree any more. I don’t even know what more to say than the guys calling her ugly had bette be banging hard Maxim 10’s week-in and week-out.
But again, it just goes with the territory. People on this website flock together to feel like their opinions are worth more than they actually are (look I’m doing it now.)
Naw but for real, anyone who says they wouldn’t smash M.G. should give back their man card.
I’ll maybe go through my facebook and save some photos for this thread, but I’d rather not…but I stand by my post 2 up that I’ve dated women better looking than Maggie…Hell I feel insulting to my exes just saying that…but I’ll do it if more people act incredulous that there are women on Earth NOT involved in Hollywood that are prettier than Maggie.
[quote]kingbeef323 wrote:
Who in the world said she was “a universal standard for what constitutes an attractive person,” lol. People in this thread were making comments about how she is straight up ugly and “backing it up” by posting the absolute worst pictures of her. There is abundant evidence that even those generally considered “hot” can look “ugly” in some pictures, just the same as less attractive people like Maggie can look downright horrible in some photos. No one said she is hot, my main point was that the comments calling her ugly, and a dog, are not warranted and that she is probably not below most men’s honest standards.[/quote]
I couldn’t agree any more. I don’t even know what more to say than the guys calling her ugly had bette be banging hard Maxim 10’s week-in and week-out.
But again, it just goes with the territory. Weak people (like most on this website and other forums with lots of members) flock together to feel like their opinions are worth more than they actually are (look I’m doing it now.)
Naw but for real, anyone who says they wouldn’t smash M.G. should give back their man card.[/quote]
[quote]Nards wrote:
^^ This was apparently posted after my post.
I’ll maybe go through my facebook and save some photos for this thread, but I’d rather not…but I stand by my post 2 up that I’ve dated women better looking than Maggie…Hell I feel insulting to my exes just saying that…but I’ll do it if more people act incredulous that there are women on Earth NOT involved in Hollywood that are prettier than Maggie.[/quote]
Dude, all the women in hollywood are the hottest women on the planet. If they are in a movie then that means they are hotter than anyone you have ever dated. Being a 24/7 drunk, I’m sure you’ve caught some real winners. Permanant beer goggles are only good for the wearer. Pleasde don’t post any pictures of the retchid trolls you call women who you have checked thier oil with your dipstick. And I mean that quite Literally.
Maggie is not pretty, but she does have an alright body and she’s a good actress. Has anyone seen that secretary movie she did with james spader? She was getting spanked and stuff…
[quote]kingbeef323 wrote:
Who in the world said she was “a universal standard for what constitutes an attractive person,” lol. People in this thread were making comments about how she is straight up ugly and “backing it up” by posting the absolute worst pictures of her. There is abundant evidence that even those generally considered “hot” can look “ugly” in some pictures, just the same as less attractive people like Maggie can look downright horrible in some photos. No one said she is hot, my main point was that the comments calling her ugly, and a dog, are not warranted and that she is probably not below most men’s honest standards.[/quote]
I couldn’t agree any more. I don’t even know what more to say than the guys calling her ugly had bette be banging hard Maxim 10’s week-in and week-out.
But again, it just goes with the territory. People on this website flock together to feel like their opinions are worth more than they actually are (look I’m doing it now.)
Naw but for real, anyone who says they wouldn’t smash M.G. should give back their man card.[/quote]
Yes…Yes!
I always form my own opinions…but when it comes to Mahggie Gylenhaal I waited till what the majority said then I decided.
[quote]Nards wrote:
^^ This was apparently posted after my post.
I’ll maybe go through my facebook and save some photos for this thread, but I’d rather not…but I stand by my post 2 up that I’ve dated women better looking than Maggie…Hell I feel insulting to my exes just saying that…but I’ll do it if more people act incredulous that there are women on Earth NOT involved in Hollywood that are prettier than Maggie.[/quote]
Dude, all the women in hollywood are the hottest women on the planet. If they are in a movie then that means they are hotter than anyone you have ever dated. Being a 24/7 drunk, I’m sure you’ve caught some real winners. Permanant beer goggles are only good for the wearer. Pleasde don’t post any pictures of the retchid trolls you call women who you have checked thier oil with your dipstick. And I mean that quite Literally.
V[/quote]
Dude you are so right!!!
How is it possible for any woman anywhere to be prettier than a woman whose image has been stored on celluloid?!?
Any woman that has had her visage imprinted on film is obviously and without a doubt prettier than a woman who has NOT had this…it is silly and inane to even discuss it!!!
[quote]Nards wrote:
^^ This was apparently posted after my post.
I’ll maybe go through my facebook and save some photos for this thread, but I’d rather not…but I stand by my post 2 up that I’ve dated women better looking than Maggie…Hell I feel insulting to my exes just saying that…but I’ll do it if more people act incredulous that there are women on Earth NOT involved in Hollywood that are prettier than Maggie.[/quote]
Dude, all the women in hollywood are the hottest women on the planet. If they are in a movie then that means they are hotter than anyone you have ever dated. Being a 24/7 drunk, I’m sure you’ve caught some real winners. Permanant beer goggles are only good for the wearer. Pleasde don’t post any pictures of the retchid trolls you call women who you have checked thier oil with your dipstick. And I mean that quite Literally.
V[/quote]
Nah, porn girls are way hotter than Hollywood girls.
[quote]Nards wrote:
^^ This was apparently posted after my post.
I’ll maybe go through my facebook and save some photos for this thread, but I’d rather not…but I stand by my post 2 up that I’ve dated women better looking than Maggie…Hell I feel insulting to my exes just saying that…but I’ll do it if more people act incredulous that there are women on Earth NOT involved in Hollywood that are prettier than Maggie.[/quote]
Dude, all the women in hollywood are the hottest women on the planet. If they are in a movie then that means they are hotter than anyone you have ever dated. Being a 24/7 drunk, I’m sure you’ve caught some real winners. Permanant beer goggles are only good for the wearer. Pleasde don’t post any pictures of the retchid trolls you call women who you have checked thier oil with your dipstick. And I mean that quite Literally.
V[/quote]
Nah, porn girls are way hotter than Hollywood girls.[/quote]
^this and they are more tested and used and abused…now that can be a good thing if you feel guilt after
[quote]Nards wrote:
You guys aren’t half wrong though…take one of the top pf my head…Tera Patrick, bloody gorgeous!!![/quote]
Now here is the mustard to THAT. I like My P-stars not so 10 like. I want a good 8 and trade the last 2 points for straight up buck-nasty-ness. Freak to the deeky.
Mika Tan
Sara Jay
a 8 and a 5 but they make up for it with skills. Just like Gylenhall is a 5 but acting chops make up for it.
[quote]Nards wrote:
^^ This was apparently posted after my post.
I’ll maybe go through my facebook and save some photos for this thread, but I’d rather not…but I stand by my post 2 up that I’ve dated women better looking than Maggie…Hell I feel insulting to my exes just saying that…but I’ll do it if more people act incredulous that there are women on Earth NOT involved in Hollywood that are prettier than Maggie.[/quote]
Dude, all the women in hollywood are the hottest women on the planet. If they are in a movie then that means they are hotter than anyone you have ever dated. Being a 24/7 drunk, I’m sure you’ve caught some real winners. Permanant beer goggles are only good for the wearer. Pleasde don’t post any pictures of the retchid trolls you call women who you have checked thier oil with your dipstick. And I mean that quite Literally.
V[/quote]
LOL! I see what you were trying to do there with that sarcastic comment but I can’t figure out where it came from considering that no where in this thread was the sentiment expressed that “women in hollywood are the hottest women on the planet.” The best anyone spoke of Maggie was that she is mediocre looking but your responses are as if someone said she is smoking hot. You and Nards definitely went off on your own tangents because your comments did NOT address the main contention in this thread in any way.
Edit: Just in case people still can’t figure it out, the main argument in this thread is “Maggie is downright ugly” vs “Maggie is ok.” It has absolutely NOTHING to do with the fact that she is a hollywood actress.
A secondary argument could be that a lot of men seem to have “e-standards” that are higher than their real life honest standards. This is probably done to try to indicate that said men get with only the best looking chicks and won’t settle for anything less because they’re such mack daddies.