[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]sharkOnesie wrote:
[quote]zecarlo wrote:
[quote]sharkOnesie wrote:
Dude, I am not arguing that, I am giving their rationale.
By the way let me state. Fuck Islam, fuck mohammed, fuck all terrorism. But have the same outrage at imperialist state terror.
[/quote]
I’m saying they have no rationale. They have no clue. They are imbeciles who reason like children and that’s why they were captivated by extremist preaching. I am almost sure they had a chip on their shoulders, some angst, some sense of life isn’t fair, and some “mentor” directed their frustrations against “imperial” soldiers. Rationale? The soldier they killed could very well have been a Muslim himself. They did it for women? They mean the women they treat like dogs and mutilate? They are two weak-minded pussies who vented their frustrations on someone who probably would have risked his life to save theirs. It’s like that loser in Boston. He had issues with life and blamed America for his shortcomings. He could have gone back to his birth country if he was having such a hard time here but instead he believes he has the right to punish other people because he can’t get what he wants. That’s vanity. Go to school. Get a job. Don’t kill people.
Imperialist state terror? That doesn’t exist in today’s world. You have Russians and Arabs buying football teams in England. You have the Saudis buying US fighters. Western nations are training the Afghan army and police. These idiots think it’s Muslims vs the world? I’ll believe that when sheiks stop driving Ferraris. [/quote]
That is a hollow meaningless thing to say. How are soldiers protecting muslims abroad, you seem to think the entire population wants them out of their country for some religeous reason, not because they are massacring thousands of people so a few white buisnessmen can make money selling the bombs, blowing shit up and make money rebuilding it, aswell as those who profit from the oil being sold in dollars opposed to foreign currency, those who mine for billions and trillions worth of minerals and the private contractors getting no bid contracts.
No its because muslims just don’t get we are giving them democracy.
you are in the 1 percent who still thinks soldiers are occupying countries for good.[/quote]
No. I just don’t believe it’s because they are Muslims. And what country are you talking about? Afghanistan? It has a government and it is working with western nations so a good number of Afghans want Western help keeping the Taliban from taking over again. I’m pretty sure that given a choice between the Taliban and having western soldiers there, Afghan women would prefer western soldiers so it isn’t the entire population.
I’m not justifying any of the wars over there but the idea that a few young men who are willing to behead another person speak for every Muslim is wrong. If it really was about Islam vs everyone else then they wouldn’t be engaged in business with the west.
I’m sure a lot of people in the ME don’t exactly love the US but I wouldn’t be surprised if they dislike(and fear)the fundamentalists even more. How many Muslims from the ME immigrate to western nations? How many westerners immigrate to the ME? That tells you something about just how much they hate the west. The World Cup is headed to the ME. Maybe they don’t hate us as much as some of them would have us believe. What exactly is their agenda? [/quote]
Where do we disagree? i agree its not a muslim thing, what i am saying is some people under occupation or against it use their religion as a way to fight back. not saying i advocate religious groups fighting imperialism rather than secular ones.
The reason they come to the west is because imperialism uses the third world as mass slave pools of labour, the first world offer better conditions, the they move here we can’t be that bad argument is terrible, they move here because we made THERE that bad.
Also womens rights has nothing to do with the war, that is a false arguement, just ask the RAWA, feminist revolutionaries of afgghanistan, they say things are just as bad for women under the occupation as before, with the added risk of being shot or bombed.
Hell, the AA and police practise the rape, selling and owning of small boys, bacha bazi which the taliban outlawed after they beat the rival faction and emerged from the mujahadeen, is that an argument that the taliban were good? NO! So women are not benefiting from the occupation, but even if they did even a tiny bit, it does not mean its a legit reason for occupation, like the fact if the taliban regained control boys would stop being raped as part of popular culture, still wouldn’t be reason to support the taliban.