Lo/Rez Training

[quote]LoRez wrote:

  • TnG mat pulls with chains are a very different thing than deadlifts; they seem to hit the whole body better than deadlifts and the constant tension seems to be great for size. I’m glad I listened to T3hPwnisher’s advice and gave them a chance. After just a week of focusing on adding volume and getting food, I both look and feel much better.
    [/quote]

This is so awesome. I am glad it worked out for you. Were I not competing, I would do exactly as you are, and just train these at a 7 mat height. Keep chugging along with it.

[quote]T3hPwnisher wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:

  • TnG mat pulls with chains are a very different thing than deadlifts; they seem to hit the whole body better than deadlifts and the constant tension seems to be great for size. I’m glad I listened to T3hPwnisher’s advice and gave them a chance. After just a week of focusing on adding volume and getting food, I both look and feel much better.
    [/quote]
    This is so awesome. I am glad it worked out for you. Were I not competing, I would do exactly as you are, and just train these at a 7 mat height. Keep chugging along with it.[/quote]
    When you quoted that, I reread what I wrote; it sounded like I just started doing these. I just started doing these with Pavel’s Bear, and I really really like the combo of the two.

Thanks again for sharing.

Went through Zooguido’s glute/hip activation warmup routine. Clams, side leg raises and single leg glute bridges. I think it’s a decent routine and did its job.

7 Mat Pulls with Chains TnG (39:00)
135 x 10
185 x 5
225 x 5
255 x 5
295 x 5 – surprisingly hard; quite doable, just harder than expected
265 x 5
240 x 5 x 10 sets

adaptifier: load: 19550@230; density: 501; improvement: 500% (I give up)

It’s interesting how the soreness shifts. My “low back pain” I was feeling before was SI joint pain I think. I don’t know much about anatomy outside of the shoulder. So there’s still some during and post-workout soreness, but it’s shifted more to the sides and at my glutes. Last week my upper back and hamstrings were sore from these, then my low back, now my glutes.

Focusing on using the glutes helped, as well as forcibly putting myself into an APT position.

Like yesterday with the Z Presses, as I fatigued, my body naturally moved to a more “efficient” pattern. I realize there’s form breakdown from fatigue in a lot of people, but I feel like my form actually gets better later on. I can no longer just power through bad positioning, so I have to use my own leverages. I feel like as long as I just provide a couple points of guidance for my body, it just knows what to do.

With these, if I tilt my hips forward at the beginning of the lift, it’s much easier, and my body retains that position without me having to think about it. If I let my hips tilt back in the beginning, the lift is harder and my low back takes the brunt of the work.

I’m glad I’m back to 5s. Moving to 290 was a mistake since it’s annoying to load the bar like that with 2-1/2 pound plates. 295 felt awfully heavy, but maybe that was because the 255 set was too much. Maybe 245 or 250 would have been better.

305 next time.

Random numbers. Not sure how to even out the average intensity numbers, but here’s the loads.

Week 1
Chain Mat Pull Load: 32,220
Z Press Load: 16,685
Axle (Grip) Mat Pull Load: 7,150
Total: 56,035

Week 2
Chain Mat Pull Load: 38,675 (+20%)
Z Press Load: 12,681 (-24%)
Axle (Grip) Mat Pull Load: 8,370 (+17%)
Total: 59,726 (+6.6%)

It’s an increase in work capacity, but not sure it has any relevance beyond that.

Also, it sounds kind of neat to say that I lifted 30 tons of weight this week.

No warmup. Straight to the bar.

7 Mat Pulls with Chains TnG (31:00)
135 x 10
185 x 5
225 x 5
255 x 3
305 x 5 – more DS than TnG, but still lowered under control
275 x 5
250 x 5 x 5 sets – having trouble maintaining back position, so stopped at 5

adaptifier load: 12720@240, density: 410, improvement: 500%

Comments above.

Not feeling it today. Generally feeling weak. 305 was still easier than expected though, though I didn’t feel confident in my hip/low-back positioning to actually do TnG. They were deadstop, but barely.

Until today, I wasn’t sure if my lats were involved in lifting… but with my top set, I now have no doubt. I could definitely feel them at the top. Didn’t see any need for glute activation since I now feel like they’re working quite hard.

As far as how I felt, maybe too much caffeine earlier in the day or lifting later than normal. Or maybe not enough food. I did eat though.

Not sure if I’m going to add 5 or 10 lbs next session. I still have 4 days to decide.

Z Press (32:00)
45 x 10
65 x 5
75 x 5
85 x 5
95 x 1
110 x 2, 105 x 2
100 x 5
90 x 5 x 5 sets

adaptifier load: 4860@81, density: 152, improvement: 0%

Dropped off to 2 reps with 110. I think I will retry this on Thursday with 110.

This was only 5 Bear sessions before hitting a deload (at 5 lbs a session). I think a linear progression is too steep for this. Monday I’ll “reset” and just increase 5 lbs a week, instead of per session. To get a minimum of 8 sessions before hitting this, I’ll drop to a top set of 95. That gives me 4 weeks to get to where I’m not quite at today.

Shoulders hurt… from mat pulls.

Also got an old/new scale so I’ll start tracking this here and there.


Arms are growing, albeit very slowly. I have small bones; ref. my wrist size.

Upper back seems to be growing fine, as are shoulders.

Chest is getting zero direct training right now.

I’m still DYEL status with clothes on. And with clothes off.

Ugh, huge photo. Why?

Axle Mat Pulls, TnG (13:30)

110 x 10
160 x 5
200 x 1
200 x 2 DS
200 x 2 DS
125 x 2 TnG

adaptifier load: 3190@145; density: 236

This is an improvement over the singles last week with 200, but barely. Also very short session today due to timing with girlfriend’s plans.

I’m not sure this is the right way to train my grip for the axle. Three weeks and no real improvement.

Shoulders hurt all last night and today before the session. The culprit seems to be the pulls.

Regarding my lackluster axle grip improvement: After reading around a bit, I may do my mat pull warmups with the axle then switch to the barbell. I may also focus on timed holds rather than reps or intensity.

Z Press
(no idea how long since I screwed up the timer, let’s just say 32 minutes to compare with last time)
45 x 10
65 x 5
75 x 5
85 x 5
95 x 1
110 x 3, 105 x 3 – took just long enough of a break to strip the 2.5lb plates
100 x 5
90 x 5 x 5 sets, 1m rests

adaptifier load: 5084@82; density: 159; improvement: I 1.2%
calculated 1RM: 116 (up from 113 last session)

Apparently the more you push it for your top sets, the harder the volume sets are. I actually had to dig in for the last couple reps.

Clean and strict press
90 x 1

Silly easy. But I’ve done 145 overhead with an olympic press, and 125 with a behind the head overhead press. I’m not really sure why the z presses are so much harder.

Just wanted to see how easy it was after the z press focus.

Lol. Now that I started actually making progress, people stopped commenting in my log.

7 Mat Pulls w/35 lb Chains
(35:00)
135 x 10
185 x 5
225 x 5
275 x 3
310 x 5
280 x 5
(snuck in a “real” deadlift here for 355; I think that’s a PR from the floor)
250 x 5 x 10 sets, 1m rests

adaptifier load: 19,505; density: 557; improvement: 500%

This was a relatively easy session. Could be because I ate a lot. Could be because I used some peptopro in gatorade and 400mg caffeine. Could be because I was happy about my 355 deadlift.

Progress.

315 should be a cinch on Monday.

Did more volume today because I had time to, but still capped it at 10 sets. I had enough in me to do more.

Also, there are lots of hot girls at my new apartment complex. Just saying.

People in the northwest are just generally thinner and in better shape, at least the non hippie/hipster types.

Just looked through my log. 355 was a Deadlift PR. Relatively easy actually.

2.4 x BW. Closing in on 2.5

Week 1
Chain Mat Pull Load: 32,220
Z Press Load: 16,685
Axle (Grip) Mat Pull Load: 7,150
Total: 56,035

Week 2
Chain Mat Pull Load: 38,675 (+20%)
Z Press Load: 12,681 (-24%)
Axle (Grip) Mat Pull Load: 8,370 (+17%)
Total: 59,726 (+6.6%)

Week 3
Chain Mat Pull Load: 32,225 (-17%)
Z Press Load: 9,944 (-22%)
Axle (Grip) Mat Pull Load: 3,190 (-62%)
Total: 45,359 (-24%)

Significant decrease in load. Still continuing to progress in strength.

[quote]LoRez wrote:
Also, there are lots of hot girls at my new apartment complex. Just saying.

People in the northwest are just generally thinner and in better shape, at least the non hippie/hipster types.[/quote]

San Diego is the best place.

Great job with the deadlift PR LoRez, I’m looking forward to seeing you get 405. I had to Google the Z press - I haven’t come across it before. What are it’s benefits? Also are you doing any direct back work? Take it easy bud.

[quote]magick wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:
Also, there are lots of hot girls at my new apartment complex. Just saying.

People in the northwest are just generally thinner and in better shape, at least the non hippie/hipster types.[/quote]
San Diego is the best place.[/quote]
I would agree with that.

Paris was good too, last time I was there (many many years ago). And South Beach.

[quote]furo wrote:
Great job with the deadlift PR LoRez, I’m looking forward to seeing you get 405. I had to Google the Z press - I haven’t come across it before. What are it’s benefits? Also are you doing any direct back work? Take it easy bud.[/quote]
I think I outlined things before awhile back, but I’ll answer anew since I’ve been doing them for awhile now.

For me, one of my biggest problems with overhead pressing was my lower back would arch forward as the weight got heavier. With the z press, this simply isn’t an option and it helps strengthen core stability and balance.

It also forces you into learning a good pressing groove, since if you don’t, you’ll be knocked over one way or another. If you press it too far forward, you’ll fall backwards (as your arms fall forwards). If you press it too far backwards, you’ll fall backwards along with the bar.

From a hypertrophy and musculature standpoint, because you’re forced into doing everything “just right”, it then makes sure that you’re using all the right muscles in concert with each other. With a standard overhead press, you can get away with using mostly upper chest and front delts, but this forces everything to work in concert… from the triceps, upper traps, and all delt heads to move the bar, to the subscapularis, mid/lower traps, serratus anterior and rotator cuff muscles to stabilize everything.

For me, it’s working out to be very good as a remedial exercise to “fix” my shoulder impingement issues, and move away from a more hunched-forward posture.

As far as WHY I’m doing it… I was reading around some of the overhead press threads in the strongman section of this site and saw it mentioned a lot. Strongman is very overhead press focused. Zydrunas Savickas, “Big Z”, the guy who invented the lift, is one of the strongest pressers the world has ever known, and just recently set a world record with a 500+ lb log press a few months back.

I also found Mike Jenkins’ training log, another one of the world’s strongest overhead pressers, and he was using a basic template that consisted of 1) a vertical pressing movement – either z presses or push presses, 2) incline bench presses, and 3) a single tricep exercise. This pattern worked well for him.

I tried adopting it, but pulled a couple ribs out of alignment initially with the z press. Once I moved and got a basic gym space set up, I started back on them, with just the z presses.

My current routine is pretty much out of Pavel’s Power to the People book… the “Russian Bear” routine. As initially outlined in the book, it used just deadlifts and side press. Do a set of 5, a set of 5 at 90% of that, then 5-25+ sets of 5 at 80% with 30-90s rests (high-tension, high-volume, short rests; his “energetic theory of hypertrophy”). Stop when you can’t get a good 5 reps. Do it a couple times a week, increase weight over time.

So… I’m doing the same thing but with chain mat pulls (which are a very very full body movement for my leverages) and z press (for the above reasons). I’m pleased with where things are going.

As far as “back work”, I’m getting 20 to 25 tons of training load a week (sets x reps x weight) in a deadlift-like movement. I’m not really finding a need for anything else right now.

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]magick wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:
Also, there are lots of hot girls at my new apartment complex. Just saying.

People in the northwest are just generally thinner and in better shape, at least the non hippie/hipster types.[/quote]
San Diego is the best place.[/quote]
I would agree with that.

Paris was good too, last time I was there (many many years ago). And South Beach.[/quote]

“The most beautiful women in the world live in Hattiesburg, Mississippi”-Hugh Heffner.

I went to college there and am inclined to agree with him.

[quote]Loftearmen wrote:
“The most beautiful women in the world live in Hattiesburg, Mississippi”-Hugh Heffner.

I went to college there and am inclined to agree with him.[/quote]
And I never made it through there… what a shame.

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]magick wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:
Also, there are lots of hot girls at my new apartment complex. Just saying.

People in the northwest are just generally thinner and in better shape, at least the non hippie/hipster types.[/quote]
San Diego is the best place.[/quote]
I would agree with that.

Paris was good too, last time I was there (many many years ago). And South Beach.[/quote]

South Carolina was awesome last time I was there (Charleston).