[quote]If lifting 6 days a week is a must, then you’re going to have to moderate your intensity VERY carefully. This means no more failing reps. EVER. Even on heavier days. To be honest, I don’t ever try and push my 1RM except to find out what it is before a meet (and during the meet obviously).
Another part of moderating intensity is heavy/light days, and setting up the order of your training intelligently. How much you can get away with depends on your body, recovery protocol, and training split. It’s a delicate balance, but you can work with it if you’re careful and listen to your body. And if you’re going to push the envelope, consistency is a must. As well as scheduling deloads in an intelligent way.[/quote]
There’s a gap here. In the context of what you’re talking about, that makes plenty of sense. However, when you say 1RM and I say 1RM, we’re talking about different things. Likewise for missing/failing a rep. It’s basically the same words, but a different language.
That’s not supposed to be defensive, just explanatory. It took me awhile to wrap my head around this stuff. It’s just a completely different way of looking at it.
At a very basic level, when I say “ramp to 1RM”, most people interpret it as “ramp to 100%”, when in reality it’s more like “ramp to 85-90%”. When I say “miss”, most people interpret it as “grinding to muscular failure”, when it’s actually “this rep isn’t going to be 100% crisp, clean, explosive, so I’ll stop”.
A far as explaining terms:
Here’s a running analogy, since I used to be a runner. Lets say you’ve got 400m runner. In training, when he’s fresh, he can run a hard 400m in about 60 seconds. Give him a few minutes to recuperate, and his next 400m, running at the same intensity, will be something like 63 seconds. Does it again, 65 seconds.
Next day, comes in fresh with a night of sleep, he can run a 60 second 400. Assuming nothing throws him off, 60 seconds is what he can hit when he’s pushing himself hard.
This is his “training max”.
Now, let’s say he has a bad day, girlfriend broke up with him, bad sleep, whatever. Pushing himself at what feels like the same intensity, he’s only able to run a 65 second pace. However, no matter how much shit happens and how bad he feels (barring injury), he’s always able to run at least a 65 second pace.
This is his “training minimum”.
Since this is real life, and there are good days and bad days, and they can’t be predicted, you get fluctuations. Some days he’s able to get 60, sometimes 62, sometimes 65.
What he’s able to do that day pushing himself hard is his “daily max”.
Ok, so ramping it up a notch, lets say there’s a track meet, and winning the state championship comes down to him. And the guy he’s trying to beat, they’re neck-and-neck the entire race. With all this pressure, intensity, completely psyched up, he manages to run his 400m in 55 seconds.
This is the “actual/competition max”. (And the only thing most people mean when they say 1RM.)
–
Given all that, this style of training is all built around the daily max. It’s an autoregulating approach that basically works like this.
- figure out how you’re actually performing today; is this a strong day or a weaker day (ramping to a daily max)
- now do some work sets, scaled to how strong you are today
It’s the work sets, their intensity and volume, that determine whether you get stronger. 5x5 at 70% (of the daily max) on a good day should feel the same as 5x5 at 70% on a bad day, even though the actual weights are different.
The idea is to give the body a consistent stimulus relative to its current state.
–
The “daily max” is just a yardstick for the real work, but irrelevant in and of itself. Serves mostly as an extended warmup to activate as many muscle fibers as possible.
And then, from that point, manipulating the volume and intensities of the worksets are where these programs really are at.
–
In effect, for the most part, you’re letting your body self-adjust the intensity and load.
CT has his take on it. Mike Tuchscherer has his take on it with his RTS/RPE training. Abadjiev has his approach. Broz has another. Nick Horton, yet another.
Out of those, Nick Horton seems the most open, having experimented with several approaches and tested with “normal” people, having them squat every day and seen great results. Not high level athletes, just people who would rather be doing some real lifting than crossfit.
Does that mean it will work for any lifts besides squats and the O-lifts? I don’t know. It might.
But this is the path I’m going to give a chance for awhile. 3 weeks hard, deload. Repeat.