[quote]Grneyes wrote:
[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
[quote]Grneyes wrote:
[quote]DixiesFinest wrote:
^since when has missouri and kentucky been part of Dixie?^
answer - never, both remained in the Union. [/quote]
You might want to let them know that, since ppl there both refer to themselves as Southerners.
EDIT: You might want to inform West Virginians too. Since the Civil War is the reason we HAVE a West Virginia in the first place. [/quote]
They can refer to themselves as that all they want.
I was more referring to the map of the assumed Confederacy (due to the Confederate Naval Flag) that included them.
EDIT - do I need to inform them? They intentionally seceded from Virginia, separating themselves from the South.
Side note, West Virginia’s secession was legal, Virginia’s wasnt? Interesting. [/quote]
Ah okay. Most Civil War maps have Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri as “border” states…Most Northerners think of them as Southern and most Southerners think of them as Northern. shrug
I have no idea about the legality of one over the other. But since W.V. seceded to stay IN the Union, I would say that it was considered legal (Constitutional, whatever) since they were siding with the Union and therefore upholding the Constitution. [/quote]
The boarder states were almost just territories during the war. But they never seceded and remained technically part of the Union (and actually were promised to keep their slaves by the emancipation proclamation).
And it depends. They were under 2 contracts. They violated the Virginia constitution the same way Virginia was violate the US constitution. It’s pretty Ironic.