[quote]CC wrote:
mrw173 wrote:
CC wrote:
I agree that the better thing to do is just get out of the class with as little conflict and as high a grade as possible. Most professors don’t like to be challenged.
Getting a high grade and avoiding conflict at the expense of experiencing what learning should truly be about is pretty stupid, if you ask me.
Apparently you missed the point of my post because you completely disregarded my first paragraph in your response.
I’m not saying it’s right. I’m not saying it’s “smart”. What I’m saying is that in most universities, it is what it is and it’s likely not going to change.
Maybe you were never concerned with going to graduate school. Or maybe you were lucky and had open-minded professors. If you were, that’s great. I agree, that is what learning should be about . . . in an ideal world.
But an interviewer at whatever medical/law/insert-grad-school-of-choice-here isn’t going to care that that black mark on your transcript was because “your professor just didn’t get it”. School and getting jobs for most people is a numbers game, period. Not everyone has the luxury of “knowing the right people”.[/quote]
Let me clarify. I don’t think that a blanket statement of advice to avoid discussing a topic with a professor because it may conflict with his or her point of view is a good way of approaching your education. Whether or not someone chooses to actually discuss something like that with a professor would be determined by a number of things, including how open-minded the professor may be, how important an “A” in that class actually is, etc.
I’m not saying to discuss the issue with him. Recommending that across all situations is just as bad as recommending avoiding it in all situations. The responses that the original poster were suggesting is that you should just avoid the situation all together, get your A, and move on. That may be the right thing to do in certain situations, but being that passive may also have adverse consequences as well.
For most rational professors, I see nothing wrong with having a polite one-on-one discussion about why he/she reached certain conclusions in the face of potentially contradictory evidence. I actually am in graduate school (not sure what your point there was), and have had plenty of experiences like this. People can look at a certain research finding, experience certain phenomena, etc. and come to completely different conclusions that may contradict what other people have come to. There’s no reason that much of the time, friendly discussion about different conclusions can’t happen. I’ve taught classes, and to me it would be a great sign if a student wanted to actively participate like that, even if he didn’t reach the same conclusions as I did.