[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
So?
It seems to me that the relative absence of abstinence nutjobs correlates quite strongly with lower abortion rates if I use the sample you have brought up. [/quote]
How can it when the very example YOU brought up, Sweden, smacks you right in the face like Moe whippin’ on Curly?[/quote]
Because its one example that bucks the trend and it stands out so much because the general trend is very clearly not as you have insinuated. [/quote]
There is no trend, per se, to be bucked.[/quote]
So what is your explanation for the significantly reduced abortion rates in the Netherlands (.20%) and Germany (.23%).
BTW, I’m not sure where the argument that Sweden has a ridiculously high abortion rate is coming from. Their abortion rate is actually lower than the US:
In 1996 they were at .56%
the US was at .69%
Switzerland was at .25%
In fact, it appears that legalizing abortion has far less to do with it’s prevalence of society than the economic level of that society.
For instance, in Eastern Europe accounts for 81% of the abortions in Europe. Also, the entirety of Africa in the survey had 5 million abortions (all illegal), whereas Northern, Southern, and Eastern Europe combined 1.5 million abortions, only .1 million illegal.
Worrying about legalization of abortion is clearly focusing on the wrong thing, as there’s clear evidence that in the majority of developed countries with legalized abortion, there are lower incidences of it than in an undeveloped country where abortion is illegal. Instead of worrying whether or not I’m right, try coming up with some explanations of your own. Since this data indicates that legalizing abortion isn’t the main contributor to its prevalence, what do YOU think is?