[quote]mapwhap wrote:
It may have already been said, but it probably bears repeating. BG was not under any obligation to answer the question. He politely declined. The officer should have just moved on, and either written the citation or not. I don’t know where he came up with the “hindering investigation” crap, cos up to that point, there wasn’t one.
More disappointing though, is the supervisor’s reaction. He obviously didn’t know what the hell he was talking about, either.
Shameful. As an LEO, it always irritates me when some rookie does something dumb. But…that’s what rookies do. They screw up. A dumb supervisor, though…that’s even worse. Cos now, who’s going to correct the original officer, and make sure he knows where the line is in the future?
One point that I don’t think has been made yet, though…there’s nothing wrong with the officer asking the question. If a person chooses to answer it, then great. If not, then just move it along. No need to get hung up on it.
Sorry bout your experience, BG. I was impressed with your letter, too. [/quote]
I “chose” to not answer it once and he put his hand on his gun and asked me to step out the car.
My guess is, those of you who don’t do shit like this are few and far between.
I feel disrepscted when some cop asks me as a grown man what I am doing out so late…as if I need to even have an answer. I’m a fucking adult. I am out so late because I want to be.