LAPD Cop Killer

Off Topic
221

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]Vegita wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]Vegita wrote:
Ok so anyone who thinks that people who think like that should be locked up, then those people also wish we were still under british rule? I don’t get it?
[/quote]

You obviously don’t get it.

You said that “you don’t see why people are bashing this guy.”

“This guy” who murdered three people who were not even involved in his situation and shot two others.

You don’t see why people are bashing someone like that?[/quote]

The only one who I can see as being not in the situation, is the fiance, but he is collateral damage, the same as a child in the same house as a “terrorist suspect” that YOU kill every time a drone strike is launched. The guy is fighting a corrupt system, did you read his manifesto? Every cop who didn’t report someone, who turned a blind eye to keep with the “blue line” code or whatever, they are all part of the problem. I’m sure he has personal anger towards certain individuals, hence the deliberate attach on the family member of the guy who oversaw his termination hearing.

So yes, I don’t get why it is OK for you to authorize on your behalf, men to kill innocent children because they reside in the same house as someone who dislikes us and may or may not be plotting to attack us. Yet can’t believe another human being would employ the same tactics. Governments rise and fall, societies wax and wane, the only true thing in this world is what an individual man will do when he realizes he is actually a free man.

V[/quote]

You are certifiably nuts. If everything he said in that manifesto is 100 percent true the bottom line is he just lost his job. JUST LOST HIS FUCKING JOB! This is not a case where one goes out and fights for justice even at the expense of innocent lives. This is a case where one goes out, gets another job and goes on with their lives. If they want to make a hobby out of it they can try to get their story out to the public, maybe even write a book. Not fucking kill people.

I read that manifesto and I read the cops side of the story. I’m not predisposed to siding with the cops, not by a long shot. I find the cops side of the story more plausible. The guy was a bad cop and his complaint against the training officer was purely a preemptive strike because he knew she was going to write him up.

In the most favorable light for Dorner he’s killing innocent people over losing his job. Not only that, police work is a mediocre career as far as careers go and he’s a guy with a college degree. Losing that job might easily have been a favor to him if he had applied himself in a constructive manner.
[/quote]

This, this and this.

The guy lost his job. I have no doubt the LAPD and many higher forms of government are corrupt and something should be done to fix them. That doesn’t happen by killing innocent people.

222

Ok, these buffons are really doing nothing to help themselves out. Two reported incidents of attacking a truck “that looked like” the guys? Come on. Aren’t cops taught to be observent? The first case with the 2 women, from what I hear, the truck wasn’t even the same make or colour. This one…the same thing, plus didn’t they just find it burnt in the mountains? Like…cc…ccc…ccccccome on.

223

[quote]Vegita wrote:
I am not above learning, however, I have a very high knowledge of internet memery, so I doubt you can teach me anything further in that area.
[/quote]

224

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]Vegita wrote:
I am not above learning, however, I have a very high knowledge of internet memery, so I doubt you can teach me anything further in that area.
[/quote]

[/quote]

Maybe it’s that I haven’t seen you in the midst of many other arguments but from what I have seen in the NFL thread and now this one you seem to be becoming a troll gregron. Like I said maybe this has always been your argument tactic but I’ve not seen it before.

225

This city is a SHIT STORM of scandal and controversy.

How the Los Angeles ArchDioses was able to molest boys for decades with no punishment.

How Los Angeles Unified School District allowed teachers to molest kids in the same manner as the Church is again beyond me.

How the city is allowed to use “creative accounting” schemes (such as assume the DOW would be over 20 million by the end of the century) to grant insane pensions and salaries for government workers which has now bankrupt the city, should have the mayor in jail. Stop believing TV shows or movies, this state is fucking huge and the shit you see on Access Hollywood is a speck of how this city or state really works.

You guys don’t get it.

This city, and even this state, makes it’s own laws and disregards the ones they don’t like, for political thievery, and whoring themselves out to Unions or corporations.

I truly think that some of what Dorner is claiming is true, not all of it but some of it. I have to believe that within a lie is some degree of truth. The fact that LAPD wants him dead proves that his “smoking gun” is something LAPD does not want anyone to check out.

Think about it, they want him dead so badly, they shot up a car that resembled his, disregarding police procedure completely, to make sure they riddled the car with bullets to make sure he was dead. Who does that ?

I want to see an independent FBI investigation into Dorner’s claims, because anyone who wants a man dead that badly, must have some serious dirt on LAPD.

226

[quote]kothreat wrote:

Ok, these buffons are really doing nothing to help themselves out. Two reported incidents of attacking a truck “that looked like” the guys? Come on. Aren’t cops taught to be observent? The first case with the 2 women, from what I hear, the truck wasn’t even the same make or colour. This one…the same thing, plus didn’t they just find it burnt in the mountains? Like…cc…ccc…ccccccome on. [/quote]

This is how badly they want him dead.

Cops openly forget about police procedure and just light up the car with bullets.

Any half-brained reporter or journalist would inquire into Dorner’s claims and see if there is any truth to it.

Get TMZ on the issue, they will find dirt in a heartbeat.

227

[quote]BeefEater wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]Vegita wrote:
I am not above learning, however, I have a very high knowledge of internet memery, so I doubt you can teach me anything further in that area.
[/quote]

[/quote]

Maybe it’s that I haven’t seen you in the midst of many other arguments but from what I have seen in the NFL thread and now this one you seem to be becoming a troll gregron. Like I said maybe this has always been your argument tactic but I’ve not seen it before.[/quote]

I was admittedly trolling Pat in the NFL thread and am obviously doing the same in here with these anti America anti religion holier than thou liberal Internet warriors.

The legitimate discussion went out the window and turned into the same old tired garbage so I decided it was time for some “meme shock and awe” lol

228

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

I want to see an independent FBI investigation into Dorner’s claims, because anyone who wants a man dead that badly, must have some serious dirt on LAPD.[/quote]

I wouldn’t mind an FBI investigation in light of everything but I don’t think the police forces hair trigger state of mind is really an indicator of department corruption. I think they’re just scared.

229

625×770 136 KB

[quote]gregron wrote:
The legitimate discussion went out the window and turned into the same old tired garbage so I decided it was time for some “meme shock and awe” lol[/quote]

Yer a silly boy. A lot of the same old tired garbage starts with you.

“Meme shock and awe”, that’s a good one. It was neither shocking, nor awe inspiring. And a few of them you definitely used wrong.

230

[quote]kothreat wrote:
“Meme shock and awe”, that’s a good one.
[/quote]

Thanks.

231

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

I want to see an independent FBI investigation into Dorner’s claims, because anyone who wants a man dead that badly, must have some serious dirt on LAPD.[/quote]

I wouldn’t mind an FBI investigation in light of everything but I don’t think the police forces hair trigger state of mind is really an indicator of department corruption. I think they’re just scared.

[/quote]

Bingo.

232

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]kothreat wrote:
“Meme shock and awe”, that’s a good one.
[/quote]

Thanks.[/quote]

No problem sweet cheeks.

233

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]kothreat wrote:

Ok, these buffons are really doing nothing to help themselves out. Two reported incidents of attacking a truck “that looked like” the guys? Come on. Aren’t cops taught to be observent? The first case with the 2 women, from what I hear, the truck wasn’t even the same make or colour. This one…the same thing, plus didn’t they just find it burnt in the mountains? Like…cc…ccc…ccccccome on. [/quote]

This is how badly they want him dead.

Cops openly forget about police procedure and just light up the car with bullets.

Any half-brained reporter or journalist would inquire into Dorner’s claims and see if there is any truth to it.

Get TMZ on the issue, they will find dirt in a heartbeat. [/quote]

Yah its clear the police are fucking up left and right on this one. They are already covering all medical expenses and paying for both trucks pre any lawsuits which they will surely lose.

I am no trained investigator but a 150 pounds soaking wet effeminate looking white dude is a long way from a 270 pound black guy.

Plus isn’t Torrance kinda known for being hard ass to keep out the riffraff from the bordering shittier communities anyway?

He already sent some shit to Anderson Cooper perhaps he’ll keep that pipeline open.

234

[quote]kothreat wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]kothreat wrote:
“Meme shock and awe”, that’s a good one.
[/quote]

Thanks.[/quote]

No problem sweet cheeks. [/quote]

Appreciate it.

235

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

I want to see an independent FBI investigation into Dorner’s claims, because anyone who wants a man dead that badly, must have some serious dirt on LAPD.[/quote]

I wouldn’t mind an FBI investigation in light of everything but I don’t think the police forces hair trigger state of mind is really an indicator of department corruption. I think they’re just scared.

[/quote]

If you had a child molested by a Los Angeles school teacher or priest, then learned that the city hid the incident because of politics, you might want more than an FBI investigation.

This might be due to fear, but not from fear of Dorner. More like fear of what might come out in light of an investigation.

I am willing to bet, that the floodgates of corruption are about to bust wide open.

A city run by a Mayor who parties with Charlie Sheen, pornstars, a senator known for flying to the Dominican Republic to enjoy hookers with a lobbyist and tax cheat.

Where there is smoke, there is fire. This whole thing stinks to holy hell.

236

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:

I want to see an independent FBI investigation into Dorner’s claims, because anyone who wants a man dead that badly, must have some serious dirt on LAPD.[/quote]

I wouldn’t mind an FBI investigation in light of everything but I don’t think the police forces hair trigger state of mind is really an indicator of department corruption. I think they’re just scared.

[/quote]

If you had a child molested by a Los Angeles school teacher or priest, then learned that the city hid the incident because of politics, you might want more than an FBI investigation.

This might be due to fear, but not from fear of Dorner. More like fear of what might come out in light of an investigation.

I am willing to bet, that the floodgates of corruption are about to bust wide open.[/quote]
I doubt it, America’s attention span is shorter than the media’s. Van der sloot will send out a love letter and everybody will forget about this guy once he’s caught. If he was smart he would’ve did some investigating first. A female officer kicking a criminal three times, or some spanish dudes sayin N****, isn’t going to bring down LAPD. I’m sure he could’ve found much more damning evidence if he was stable.

237

[quote]Vegita wrote:

[quote]gregron wrote:

[quote]Vegita wrote:
The only one who I can see as being not in the situation, is the fiance, but he is collateral damage, the same as a child in the same house as a “terrorist suspect” that YOU kill every time a drone strike is launched…

So yes, I don’t get why it is OK for you to authorize on your behalf, men to kill innocent children because they reside in the same house as someone who dislikes us and may or may not be plotting to attack us.
[/quote]

Seriously bro, what are you even talking about?[/quote]

Orion understands it, I sense he is frustrated at having tried to explain it numerous times to be met with blank stares (in real life) of cool story bro’s in internet life.

I will do my best to help you understand my point, but it is going to take some time for me to get the required materials together. There are a couple short videos which illustrate what I wish to tell you in a much clearer manner than I will be able to with the written word.

V[/quote]

I understand what you mean. But you can’t make a fair assessment of the collateral damage of remote/drone warfare (an emerging technology that will save lives in the long run) used in countries where terrorist tactics are just as likely to kill their own as they are to off intended targets.

238

Dorner doesn’t seem to want to live through this. Even if he does, he’s not going to bring down the LAPD single-handedly.

239

[quote]roybot wrote:
I understand what you mean. But you can’t make a fair assessment of the collateral damage of remote/drone warfare (an emerging technology that will save lives in the long run) [/quote]

Whose lives will it save though? That of soldiers or innocent civilians?

This nearly sounds like justification for these incidents. I may be misunderstanding your point though. Either way we should never be ok with collateral damage. Being ok with it provides terrorist organizations with plenty of new recruits.

240

[quote]BeefEater wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:
I understand what you mean. But you can’t make a fair assessment of the collateral damage of remote/drone warfare (an emerging technology that will save lives in the long run) [/quote]

Whose lives will it save though? That of soldiers or innocent civilians?

This nearly sounds like justification for these incidents. I may be misunderstanding your point though. Either way we should never be ok with collateral damage. Being ok with it provides terrorist organizations with plenty of new recruits.[/quote]

Terrorist organizations are already fine with collateral damage; that’s why they’re so successful. It’s not like they don’t kill innocent civilians.