You could also… NOT go there…
To my knowledge the only people who died over there that night died at the hands of Rittenhouse.
The rioters could also not be there. Your morals are really messed up if you justify f the rioters who cross state borders with illegal weapons and attack under aged boys to be there, but you are not able to do so for Kyle Rittenhouse. Basically a citizen of Kenosha, whos town is under siege of degenerates. What is he supposed to do? Stay home until house is burned down?
3 Likes
… You are deliberately skewing my narrative to justify an attack on my morals in effort to shut my argument down.
Kyle Rittenhouse is not a cop… He is not special forces, he is not the millitary
He was a minor at the time who illegally procured an assault rifle, went to a riot and ended up killing people. He had a history of carrying body armour in the trunk of his car. By all means, Mark Rittenhouse isn’t some rebellious patriot. He was as wannabe cop who decided to play vigilante.
But he’s not a cop… He should have stayed home…
His body armor was issued by the police legally.
The rioters should have stayed home as well. You see you cant justify an illegal riot and riots who were to blame for tens of people killed, bilions in damages, but not justify Kile Rittenhouse. It is fucked up morality, I am sorry.
1 Like
Is giving the body armour to a friend legal too? Absolute law abiding citizen he was…
We can go endlessly here, mate. Same as the rioters - model citizens.
Bullshit. I’m not justifying any rioting. How do you infer this. The rioters should have stayed home, but as they didn’t… It was up to the cops or millitary to solve this, not kids with illegally procured firearms.
Is this thread about Kyle Rittenhouse? Of is it about the rioters? If this was a thread about the rioters I’d be condemning them too…
Kyle Rittenhouse was the only individual to kill anyone that night (in his vicinity)
He was the only one attacked by a fucked up child rapist and then while trying to surrender to the police by other degenerates.
Did Rittenhouse know he was a rapist?
How does this have anything to do with anything re the case at stake here. A CHILD rapist wasn’t going to pin Rittenhouse (one year off being legally distinguished as an adult) and rape him in public?
Pedophiles generally like young kids… Not Kyle Rittenhouse. You’re using the man’s criminal record to support your narrative, but it is entirely irrelevant to the topic at hand.
Am I mourning this man’s death? Not in the slightest
But the topic is “Were Rittenhouse’s actions morally justifiable”
I say no, you say yes. Had Rittenhouse known the man was a child rapist you’d have an argument… Sort of…
And, why was Rittenhouse in PARTICULAR attacked multiple times? Somehow he managed to get himself into MULTIPLE situations wherein he felt as if his life was being threatened. He wasn’t the only one armed at this event. So why were the only deaths that night at his hands?
My argument is he was attacked by degenerates. The child rapist argument is to describe why are they degenerates. See I am not calling out on all rioters, but I claim all rioters had no job there. However note how the people shot were all with criminal records. So they were inflicting the shootings. None without a criminal record was shot. Do you see the trend now?
Huh?
That’s not how it works. If I have a conviction for something terrible like selling meth to kids, I’m out of prison and I’m stabbed in a mugging… Did I entice my attacker who didn’t know me to begin with?
What is to huh? Only criminals attacked Kyle Rittenhouse, because they wanted to make yet another crime. The dude was defending himself.
He left the scene of the first shooting and was heading toward the police line when he was attacked by the mob. What do you think he should have been doing after the first shooting if not that?
Kyle was also breaking the law, so he is a criminal. Does that make them attacking him OK?
If you take out outsider, how accurate is the statement?
Technically, it wasn’t his weapon.
But that doesn’t make it legal self defense. If you break into my house with a weapon, and I try to take it, you can’t claim self defense if you shoot me.
Obviously. That has nothing to do with what happened, as Rittenhouse had at least as much right to be there as the aggressors.
1 Like
I broke the law today, by going out running while in quarantine. Should a rioter attack me?
1 Like
Not armed, though.
1 Like
2 Likes