[quote]Vegita wrote:
I do believe there are genetic factors at play. I truly believe some people due to their heritage (and their ancestors diets) have adapted to thrive on different levels of animal protein. Although I don’t think evolutionarily, body comp was ever a genetic limiting factor, I believe some people will feel better eating some meat. But I don’t think it is optimal for anyone to consume 300 Lbs per year, at least with respect to optimal “HEALTH”, not necessarily body composition.
Quick story, my sisters boyfriend, 35, tall, lean, nonsmoker, competes in downhill mountain biking. Anyone who looks at him would consider him healthy and fit. He is 35 and has already gone through lymphoma, a heart attack and is now dealing with a stroke which has left him unable to use his entire left side. I can give you 30 other stories of people who should not be dealing with such medical issues who have had to. There is something wrong with our diets, and I’m not above looking at all the information rationally, including if it points to my delicious NY strip as a possible detrimental food.
V[/quote]
This is where your thinking is flawed, you throw all meat into the same category. Average person’s 300lbs of meat is not New York strip, but chicken nuggets, Hardee’s Sausage buiscuits and whatever the hell it is they put in hot pockets. That’s like saying the carbs in an apple and the carbs in a pop tart are all the same.
Would you be healthier if you eliminated all the fast food and overly processed meats that make up the majority of the average american’s diet from your plate? Absolutely.

