[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
no it is like Soros bad but Cocks worse [/quote]
Using specifics, please explain why.[/quote]
I know Soros spends a lot of money trying to end the war on drugs .
I know Cock Industries spends lots of money debunking Science
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
no it is like Soros bad but Cocks worse [/quote]
Using specifics, please explain why.[/quote]
I know Soros spends a lot of money trying to end the war on drugs .
I know Cock Industries spends lots of money debunking Science
[/quote]
So… One uses his power, money and influence to do what you agree with therefore you’re okay with the use of power, money and influence in politics. The other uses power, money and influence to do what you don’t agree with therefore you call him a “cock”.
Stunning consistency.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
no it is like Soros bad but Cocks worse [/quote]
Using specifics, please explain why.[/quote]
I know Soros spends a lot of money trying to end the war on drugs .
I know Cock Industries spends lots of money debunking Science
[/quote]
So… One uses his power, money and influence to do what you agree with therefore you’re okay with the use of power, money and influence in politics. The other uses power, money and influence to do what you don’t agree with therefore you call him a “cock”.
Stunning consistency. [/quote]
Yes I am guilty of liking people spending their money on projects I think are good for man kind as apposed.
One simple difference is the Cock’s money is spent of momney that is self serving . If Cimate change is in fact real and the populace belives it to be so , it would cost the Cocks a lot of money .
Sorros on the other hand will make or lose any money no matter whether America continues to throw trillions down a rat hole or not , He evidently feels as I do that it would save America a lot of money and do man kind , not only in America but Mexico , All Central America and big parts of the World all kinds of good .
Comparing Cocks to Sorros is like comparing the Plague to a Cold
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
no it is like Soros bad but Cocks worse [/quote]
Using specifics, please explain why.[/quote]
I know Soros spends a lot of money trying to end the war on drugs .
I know Cock Industries spends lots of money debunking Science
[/quote]
So… One uses his power, money and influence to do what you agree with therefore you’re okay with the use of power, money and influence in politics. The other uses power, money and influence to do what you don’t agree with therefore you call him a “cock”.
Stunning consistency. [/quote]
Yes I am guilty of liking people spending their money on projects I think are good for man kind as apposed.
One simple difference is the Cock’s money is spent of momney that is self serving . If Cimate change is in fact real and the populace belives it to be so , it would cost the Cocks a lot of money .
Sorros on the other hand will make or lose any money no matter whether America continues to throw trillions down a rat hole or not , He evidently feels as I do that it would save America a lot of money and do man kind , not only in America but Mexico , All Central America and big parts of the World all kinds of good .
Comparing Cocks to Sorros is like comparing the Plague to a Cold
[/quote]
lol
Just lol.
Your bias here is so astounding I don’t even have to break down your post, it does it to itself.
Soros helped the fucking Nazi’s and you think he does what he does out of altruism?
LMFAO
AT least you openly admit your utter lack of integrity and objectivity.
He wouldn’t make money… lmao
Please tell me you’re trolling.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
no it is like Soros bad but Cocks worse [/quote]
Using specifics, please explain why.[/quote]
I know Soros spends a lot of money trying to end the war on drugs .
I know Cock Industries spends lots of money debunking Science
[/quote]
So… One uses his power, money and influence to do what you agree with therefore you’re okay with the use of power, money and influence in politics. The other uses power, money and influence to do what you don’t agree with therefore you call him a “cock”.
Stunning consistency. [/quote]
Yes I am guilty of liking people spending their money on projects I think are good for man kind as apposed.
One simple difference is the Cock’s money is spent of momney that is self serving . If Cimate change is in fact real and the populace belives it to be so , it would cost the Cocks a lot of money .
Sorros on the other hand will make or lose any money no matter whether America continues to throw trillions down a rat hole or not , He evidently feels as I do that it would save America a lot of money and do man kind , not only in America but Mexico , All Central America and big parts of the World all kinds of good .
Comparing Cocks to Sorros is like comparing the Plague to a Cold
[/quote]
lol
Just lol.
Your bias here is so astounding I don’t even have to break down your post, it does it to itself.
Soros helped the fucking Nazi’s and you think he does what he does out of altruism?
LMFAO
AT least you openly admit your utter lack of integrity and objectivity.
He wouldn’t make money… lmao
Please tell me you’re trolling. [/quote]
just curious how did Soros help the Nazis ?
I Could be mis informed by my integrity is in tact
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
no it is like Soros bad but Cocks worse [/quote]
Using specifics, please explain why.[/quote]
I know Soros spends a lot of money trying to end the war on drugs .
I know Cock Industries spends lots of money debunking Science
[/quote]
So… One uses his power, money and influence to do what you agree with therefore you’re okay with the use of power, money and influence in politics. The other uses power, money and influence to do what you don’t agree with therefore you call him a “cock”.
Stunning consistency. [/quote]
Yes I am guilty of liking people spending their money on projects I think are good for man kind as apposed.
One simple difference is the Cock’s money is spent of momney that is self serving . If Cimate change is in fact real and the populace belives it to be so , it would cost the Cocks a lot of money .
Sorros on the other hand will make or lose any money no matter whether America continues to throw trillions down a rat hole or not , He evidently feels as I do that it would save America a lot of money and do man kind , not only in America but Mexico , All Central America and big parts of the World all kinds of good .
Comparing Cocks to Sorros is like comparing the Plague to a Cold
[/quote]
The fact that you had to use “if” when describing how true Climate Change is (or isn’t) shows exactly why there shouldn’t be character assassination. This is an issue not yet settled, despite what the God-King claimed, because the science on this issue is less than stellar.
What is your opinion on Tom Steyer, the billionaire willing to donate $100 million to candidates supporting Climate Change ? Is he benevolent because he is giving his money to a cause that has not even been proven yet ?
Or George Kaiser, the largest investor of Solyndra, who is also an Obama donor. Surely Obama’s gift of a $500 million loan is pure coincidence.
In his autobiograpy, entitled Soros on Soros, he described how as a teenager he helped to cart off the stolen possessions of Hungarian Jewish men, women and children after they were rounded up and transported to death camps. He claims it never bothered him a bit, and still doesn’t bother him today. He has no personal regrets about his actions. Soros, a reputed psychopath[3][4][5], told Steve Kroft of CBSNews in response to questions about his behavior in an interview with of 60 Minutes,
KROFT: No feeling of guilt?
Mr. SOROS: No.
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I Could be mis informed by my integrity is in tact
[/quote]
You are misinformed if you didn’t know about the fact he is a Jew that helped the Nazi. Which isn’t an insult. The media doesn’t typically attack the people funding them.
However, if you don’t see what Soros and Koch both do (and they do the same things) as either both wrong, or both okay, your integrity is shit. Sorry. That isn’t an insult either. It is pointing out intellectual inconsistency to the highest degree.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I Could be mis informed by my integrity is in tact
[/quote]
You are misinformed if you didn’t know about the fact he is a Jew that helped the Nazi. Which isn’t an insult. The media doesn’t typically attack the people funding them.
However, if you don’t see what Soros and Koch both do (and they do the same things) as either both wrong, or both okay, your integrity is shit. Sorry. That isn’t an insult either. It is pointing out intellectual inconsistency to the highest degree. [/quote]
from what I can tell the rumor that Soros collaborated with the Nazis come from Ann Coulter amking a comment on Hannity’s show and was never verified by any one else . Is that correct ?
If you go back to what I originally said . “Soros is bad and Cocks are worse”
I did side with Soros especially on his advocacy of abolishing the war on drugs .But I am sure that some of Soros money is ill spent
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
from what I can tell the rumor that Soros collaborated with the Nazis come from Ann Coulter amking a comment on Hannity’s show and was never verified by any one else . Is that correct ?
[/quote]
He fucking admitted to it on 60 mins dude.
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
The fact that you had to use “if” when describing how true Climate Change is (or isn’t) shows exactly why there shouldn’t be character assassination.
[/quote]
I disagree with your linguistical analysis
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
from what I can tell the rumor that Soros collaborated with the Nazis come from Ann Coulter amking a comment on Hannity’s show and was never verified by any one else . Is that correct ?
[/quote]
He fucking admitted to it on 60 mins dude.
[/quote]
I e asked what did he do , what did he admit to ? Burning Jews at the stake ?
Giving Hitler Tax advice in American Holdings ? What ?
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
from what I can tell the rumor that Soros collaborated with the Nazis come from Ann Coulter amking a comment on Hannity’s show and was never verified by any one else . Is that correct ?
[/quote]
He fucking admitted to it on 60 mins dude.
[/quote]
I e asked what did he do , what did he admit to ? Burning Jews at the stake ?
Giving Hitler Tax advice in American Holdings ? What ?
[/quote]
In his autobiograpy, entitled Soros on Soros, he described how as a teenager he helped to cart off the stolen possessions of Hungarian Jewish men, women and children after they were rounded up and transported to death camps. He claims it never bothered him a bit, and still doesn’t bother him today. He has no personal regrets about his actions. Soros, a reputed psychopath[3][4][5], told Steve Kroft of CBSNews in response to questions about his behavior in an interview with of 60 Minutes,
KROFT: No feeling of guilt?
Mr. SOROS: No.
DURP
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]pittbulll wrote:
from what I can tell the rumor that Soros collaborated with the Nazis come from Ann Coulter amking a comment on Hannity’s show and was never verified by any one else . Is that correct ?
[/quote]
He fucking admitted to it on 60 mins dude.
[/quote]
I e asked what did he do , what did he admit to ? Burning Jews at the stake ?
Giving Hitler Tax advice in American Holdings ? What ?
[/quote]
In his autobiograpy, entitled Soros on Soros, he described how as a teenager he helped to cart off the stolen possessions of Hungarian Jewish men, women and children after they were rounded up and transported to death camps. He claims it never bothered him a bit, and still doesn’t bother him today. He has no personal regrets about his actions. Soros, a reputed psychopath[3][4][5], told Steve Kroft of CBSNews in response to questions about his behavior in an interview with of 60 Minutes,
KROFT: No feeling of guilt?
Mr. SOROS: No.
DURP[/quote]
thanks for the info
Soros truly is an evil man.
Anyone that wants to discuss the Koch Brothers and ignores Soros and the other 40 bigger money guys than the Koch Brothers that donate heavily to the Dem’s is deluded.
That this is even a topic for discussion shows how well the propaganda works.