Kick 'em While They're Down

[quote]miniross wrote:
Matthew9v9 wrote:
miniross wrote:
this thread has gone off track, heres a comment.

If all theologans dissapeared tommorrow, what in real terms would be lost? what would dissapear with them that wasn’t already there or self evident?

I would hasten to say nothing, but others may dissagree

No one would exist. Everyone thinks ABOUT (note, I did not say “thinks there is a”) God in some way, whether that is that the Christian/Jewish God is true, the pantheists, deists, or even ATHEIST which have no belief (often, they think more about God than the others because they discuss their lack of belief so readily on forums…ehem).

JMO,
Matt

so you are a creationist, then?

[/quote]

You misunderstood me. You asked if all theologians disappeared. I’m saying that we are ALL, in some form or fashion, theologians in that we all pontificate about God to some degree. We would ALL disappear.
Don’t read INTO what I said, read the words only.

Matt

[quote]miniross wrote:
“i cant blame you for not understanding the value of theologians as you aren’t a christian”.
[/quote]
That wasn’t my statement in its entirety. My statement as anyone can plainly observe was:
(A)Can’t blame you for not recognizing the value of theologians since you’re not a Christian
(B)and you obviously have no understanding of the essence of sin as an unhealthy condition of the soul.

Computing (A) with (B) yields (C). By reading your posts, it’s clear your understanding of sin is legalistic and misconstrued, thus evident that you lack (B). You also, by your own admission, lack a key ingredient necessary for (A); faith in Jesus Christ. That’s why I can’t blame you for not discovering (C).

No. Others share the same concern for eugenics as well. I work with developmentally delayed individuals and their families. Sometimes, when parents of retarded children wish to further procreate, they go through great measures, medically testing, gene mapping, specific nutritional schemes, etc. to ensure the lowest probability their next spawn will be mentally handicapped. Clearly, not only the Nazis comprehend eugenics.

Ok, just tell yourself this the next time you suffer a concussion. I highly doubt you’ll have the balls to wave AWAY an ambulance. This reminds me of Vietnam where shrapnel wizzed through the air, grenades blowing up, and hailstorms of gunfire chattering for hours as Christians and athiests alike were locked in the fetal positions praying to God Almighty. Everyone shows their true colors when a shocking scenario overwhelms us.

That’s where faith is essential. Jesus Christ resurrected from the dead, re-affirmed to His Apostles and countless followers that He’d conquered the realm of Hades, and was going forth to prepare heaven for those who follow in His ways. For forty more days He remained with them before ascending into heaven. The Biblical account of Lazarus also confirms an afterlife, and in accordance with holy tradition, the Orthodox Christian Church teaches that Lazarus was raised from death after 3 days and was later murdered by assassins so that he could no longer bear testimony of his spiritual journey. The Orthodox Christian Church also has the accounts of Saints who further validate that an afterlife is very real. Faith is an esssential component in such matters. Either you have it or you don’t. The whole concept of faith subtracts the possibility of ever knowing for sure, but indeed one day the truth will be revealed. I’d hate to discover that the manner by which I lived my life was wrong upon dieing though.

Peace be with you.

[hijack alert]

Sometimes the sheer irony found on these forums is hilarious.

stellar wrote:

“20:16
And whatever woman shall approach any beast, so as to have connection with it, ye shall kill the woman and the beast: let them die the death, they are guilty.”

…and his avatar is a minotaur.

“The Minotaur was born to the queen of Crete, Pasipha?, after she mated with a sacred bull” - courtesy of the new dictionary of cultural literacy, third edition 2002

[hijack over]

Cheers,

Soup

In response to Stellar’s quote “The Orthodox Christian Church also has the accounts of Saints who further validate that an afterlife is very real. Faith is an esssential component in such matters. Either you have it or you don’t. The whole concept of faith subtracts the possibility of ever knowing for sure, but indeed one day the truth will be revealed.”

I posted the below on another thread - From Time Mag (aust) November 2004
http://www.time.com/...725072,00.html

The God Gene - a scientist has isolated a set of genes which indicate an individuals predisposition to feeling spiritual.
A couple of excerpts:

“Hamer decided to use the data he gathered in the smoking survey to conduct a little spirituality study on the side. First he ranked the participants along Cloninger’s self-transcendence scale, placing them on a continuum from least to most spiritually inclined. Then he went poking around in their genes to see if he could find the DNA responsible for the differences. Spelunking in the human genome is not easy, what with 35,000 genes consisting of 3.2 billion chemical bases. To narrow the field, Hamer confined his work to nine specific genes known to play major roles in the production of monoamines?brain chemicals, including serotonin, norepinephrine and dopamine, that regulate such fundamental functions as mood and motor control. It’s monoamines that are carefully manipulated by Prozac and other antidepressants. It’s also monoamines that are not so carefully scrambled by ecstasy, LSD, peyote and other mind-altering drugs?some of which have long been used in religious rituals.
Studying the nine candidate genes in DNA samples provided by his subjects, Hamer quickly hit the genetic jackpot. A variation in a gene known as vmat2?for vesicular monoamine transporter?seemed to be directly related to how the volunteers scored on the self-transcendence test. Those with the nucleic acid cytosine in one particular spot on the gene ranked high. Those with the nucleic acid adenine in the same spot ranked lower. “A single change in a single base in the middle of the gene seemed directly related to the ability to feel self-transcendence,” Hamer says. Merely having that feeling did not mean those people would take the next step and translate their transcendence into a belief in?or even a quest for?God. But they seemed likelier to do so than those who never got the feeling at all.
Hamer is careful to point out that the gene he found is by no means the only one that affects spirituality. Even minor human traits can be governed by the interplay of many genes; something as complex as belief in God could involve hundreds or even thousands.”

and:

"Hamer also stresses that while he may have located a genetic root for spirituality, that is not the same as a genetic root for religion.
Spirituality is a feeling or a state of mind; religion is the way that state gets codified into law. Our genes don’t get directly involved in writing legislation. As Hamer puts it, perhaps understating a bit the emotional connection many have to their religions, “Spirituality is intensely personal; religion is institutional.”

"Other researchers have taken the science in a different direction, looking not for the genes that code for spirituality but for how that spirituality plays out in the brain. Neuroscientist Andrew Newberg of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine has used several types of imaging systems to watch the brains of subjects as they meditate or pray. By measuring blood flow, he determines which regions are responsible for the feelings the volunteers experience.
The deeper that people descend into meditation or prayer, Newberg found, the more active the frontal lobe and the limbic system become.
The frontal lobe is the seat of concentration and attention; the limbic system is where powerful feelings, including rapture, are processed. More revealing is the fact that at the same time these regions flash to life, another important region?the parietal lobe at the back of the brain?goes dim. It’s this lobe that orients the individual in time and space. Take it off-line, and the boundaries of the self fall away, creating the feeling of being at one with the universe. Combine that with what’s going on in the other two lobes, and you can put together a profound religious experience. "

The way I see it - Stellar is 100% correct - you have faith or you don’t - and it’s genetically determined. As such, does this mean those who are not predisposed to have a religious faith, are therefore going to a hell they CAN’T believe in?

[quote]soupandspoons wrote:

Sometimes the sheer irony found on these forums is hilarious.

stellar wrote:

“20:16
And whatever woman shall approach any beast, so as to have connection with it, ye shall kill the woman and the beast: let them die the death, they are guilty.”

…and his avatar is a minotaur.

“The Minotaur was born to the queen of Crete, Pasipha?, after she mated with a sacred bull” - courtesy of the new dictionary of cultural literacy, third edition 2002

Cheers,

Soup[/quote]

Hey soup, someone beat ya to a similar punchline months ago. Decided to use an image of the minotaur because my father is actually from the island of Crete and the particular image I found was of one that was totally jacked up. Comical observation on your part though.

[quote]ShaunW wrote:
In response to Stellar’s quote “The Orthodox Christian Church also has the accounts of Saints who further validate that an afterlife is very real. Faith is an esssential component in such matters. Either you have it or you don’t. The whole concept of faith subtracts the possibility of ever knowing for sure, but indeed one day the truth will be revealed.”
[/quote]
*Regarding Saints: I was alluding to Orthodox Christian tradition which contains a multitude of miracles whereby Saints, some of whom died centuries earlier, appear to believers in dreams, visions, and even in the flesh testifying of heaven & hell.

The science of trying to genetically map spirituality is in a pioneering stage, thus I’d be quite reluctant to draw any premature conclusions on the matter. After all, weren’t scientists trying to draw similar theories regarding the gene(s) responsible for homosexuality which have since been debunked?

And the article itself warns that:
“Hamer is careful to point out that the gene he found is by no means the only one that affects spirituality.”

For all we know, there are hundreds of genes responsible for affecting spirituality which yield a congruent effect. Just because someone lacks the nucleic acid cytosine in one particular spot on this gene does not mean they are automatically predisposed to high levels of spirituality; there may be correlative factors which have yet to be discovered.

Finally, science is catching up to the Church! There is a reason why Jesus Christ emphatically endorses that all Christians “watch and pray” and that the Bible teaches us to “pray unceasingly”. The Creator perfectly understands the way humans are designed, for we are His creations. It makes excellent sense that Jesus Christ who wills for all of us to achieve salvation instructed us in the proper methods and therapies in accomplishing such a struggle. Jesus Christ preached about a spiritual kingdom, and if praying is one of the ways we prepare for this spiritual destination, so be it - we should dedicate time to pray more often.

Just because science has finally discovered a pathway that religious or spiritual experiences manifest themselves does not mean God had nothing to do with this design. This is the way the Creator created for His creations to experience Him. Nothing dazzling about that. Had research shown otherwise - that there was NO change in brainwave activity when praying, then you might’ve had a compulsive argument to steer people away from the Christian Faith. Like “hey look, you praying does nothing on a neurological level”. Humans are composed of 2 elements - the biological & the spiritual. That’s why FASTING is also critical in addition to PRAYER. Both these therapies are executed with the body but have a great impact on the soul. The Orthodox Christian Church has stressed the value of prayer, amongst other therapies mentioned in my initial post, but was never able to provide scientific data to validate its position. Hopefully as time rolls on we’ll see technological advances continue to support the teachings of the Church.

1-FAITH IS NOT GENETICALLY DETERMINED. The article you posted above even refutes you. If ANYONE, regardless of genetic code, actively engages in deep meditation or prayer on a long-term basis, they’ll excite the frontal lobe & limbic system, thus affecting spiritual experiences. It is these spiritual experiences commencing in the mind which Jesus Christ calls for mankind to employ so that when the mind becomes purified, the heart may slowly begin to be cleansed as well. A spiritual catharsis may or may not necessitate biological prerequisites. Go read about how Jesus Christ did nothing but fast & pray for 40 days & 40 nights in the wilderness, thereby exhibiting the method for all us sinners to be spiritually strengthened and cleansed.

2-A second reason I STRONGLY DENY that faith is genetically determined is because of my own personal experiences. I went from having very little of it for almost 20 years of my life, then I had a great deal of it for some years, then I had absolutely none for almost 3, and now I have faith again. It doesn’t seem to be, “well since you don’t have it now, you never will”, or “well you have it now so you always will” as you insinuate. And for the record, I know a few people that’ve had similar experiences. How can gene mapping explain away this phenomenon?

Peace be with you.

[quote]stellar_horizon wrote:
ShaunW wrote:
In response to Stellar’s quote “The Orthodox Christian Church also has the accounts of Saints who further validate that an afterlife is very real. Faith is an esssential component in such matters. Either you have it or you don’t. The whole concept of faith subtracts the possibility of ever knowing for sure, but indeed one day the truth will be revealed.”

*Regarding Saints: I was alluding to Orthodox Christian tradition which contains a multitude of miracles whereby Saints, some of whom died centuries earlier, appear to believers in dreams, visions, and even in the flesh testifying of heaven & hell.

The God Gene - a scientist has isolated a set of genes which indicate an individuals predisposition to feeling spiritual.
A couple of excerpts:

"Hamer decided to use the data he gathered in the smoking survey to conduct a little spirituality study on the side. First he ranked the participants along Cloninger’s self-transcendence scale, placing them on a continuum from least to most spiritually inclined. Then he went poking around in their genes to see if he could find the DNA responsible for the differences. Spelunking in the human genome is not easy, what with 35,000 genes consisting of 3.2 billion chemical bases. To narrow the field, Hamer confined his work to nine specific genes known to play major roles in the production of monoamines?brain chemicals, including serotonin, norepinephrine and dopamine, that regulate such fundamental functions as mood and motor control. It’s monoamines that are carefully manipulated by Prozac and other antidepressants. It’s also monoamines that are not so carefully scrambled by ecstasy, LSD, peyote and other mind-altering drugs?some of which have long been used in religious rituals.

Studying the nine candidate genes in DNA samples provided by his subjects, Hamer quickly hit the genetic jackpot. A variation in a gene known as vmat2?for vesicular monoamine transporter?seemed to be directly related to how the volunteers scored on the self-transcendence test. Those with the nucleic acid cytosine in one particular spot on the gene ranked high. Those with the nucleic acid adenine in the same spot ranked lower. “A single change in a single base in the middle of the gene seemed directly related to the ability to feel self-transcendence,” Hamer says. Merely having that feeling did not mean those people would take the next step and translate their transcendence into a belief in?or even a quest for?God. But they seemed likelier to do so than those who never got the feeling at all.

Hamer is careful to point out that the gene he found is by no means the only one that affects spirituality. Even minor human traits can be governed by the interplay of many genes; something as complex as belief in God could involve hundreds or even thousands."

and:

"Hamer also stresses that while he may have located a genetic root for spirituality, that is not the same as a genetic root for religion.
Spirituality is a feeling or a state of mind; religion is the way that state gets codified into law. Our genes don’t get directly involved in writing legislation. As Hamer puts it, perhaps understating a bit the emotional connection many have to their religions, “Spirituality is intensely personal; religion is institutional.”

The science of trying to genetically map spirituality is in a pioneering stage, thus I’d be quite reluctant to draw any premature conclusions on the matter. After all, weren’t scientists trying to draw similar theories regarding the gene(s) responsible for homosexuality which have since been debunked?

And the article itself warns that:
“Hamer is careful to point out that the gene he found is by no means the only one that affects spirituality.”

For all we know, there are hundreds of genes responsible for affecting spirituality which yield a congruent effect. Just because someone lacks the nucleic acid cytosine in one particular spot on this gene does not mean they are automatically predisposed to high levels of spirituality; there may be correlative factors which have yet to be discovered.

"Other researchers have taken the science in a different direction, looking not for the genes that code for spirituality but for how that spirituality plays out in the brain. Neuroscientist Andrew Newberg of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine has used several types of imaging systems to watch the brains of subjects as they meditate or pray. By measuring blood flow, he determines which regions are responsible for the feelings the volunteers experience.

The deeper that people descend into meditation or prayer, Newberg found, the more active the frontal lobe and the limbic system become.

Finally, science is catching up to the Church! There is a reason why Jesus Christ emphatically endorses that all Christians “watch and pray” and that the Bible teaches us to “pray unceasingly”. The Creator perfectly understands the way humans are designed, for we are His creations. It makes excellent sense that Jesus Christ who wills for all of us to achieve salvation instructed us in the proper methods and therapies in accomplishing such a struggle. Jesus Christ preached about a spiritual kingdom, and if praying is one of the ways we prepare for this spiritual destination, so be it - we should dedicate time to pray more often.

The frontal lobe is the seat of concentration and attention; the limbic system is where powerful feelings, including rapture, are processed. More revealing is the fact that at the same time these regions flash to life, another important region?the parietal lobe at the back of the brain?goes dim. It’s this lobe that orients the individual in time and space. Take it off-line, and the boundaries of the self fall away, creating the feeling of being at one with the universe. Combine that with what’s going on in the other two lobes, and you can put together a profound religious experience. "

Just because science has finally discovered a pathway that religious or spiritual experiences manifest themselves does not mean God had nothing to do with this design. This is the way the Creator created for His creations to experience Him. Nothing dazzling about that. Had research shown otherwise - that there was NO change in brainwave activity when praying, then you might’ve had a compulsive argument to steer people away from the Christian Faith. Like “hey look, you praying does nothing on a neurological level”. Humans are composed of 2 elements - the biological & the spiritual. That’s why FASTING is also critical in addition to PRAYER. Both these therapies are executed with the body but have a great impact on the soul. The Orthodox Christian Church has stressed the value of prayer, amongst other therapies mentioned in my initial post, but was never able to provide scientific data to validate its position. Hopefully as time rolls on we’ll see technological advances continue to support the teachings of the Church.

The way I see it - Stellar is 100% correct - you have faith or you don’t - and it’s genetically determined. As such, does this mean those who are not predisposed to have a religious faith, are therefore going to a hell they CAN’T believe in?

1-FAITH IS NOT GENETICALLY DETERMINED. The article you posted above even refutes you. If ANYONE, regardless of genetic code, actively engages in deep meditation or prayer on a long-term basis, they’ll excite the frontal lobe & limbic system, thus affecting spiritual experiences. It is these spiritual experiences commencing in the mind which Jesus Christ calls for mankind to employ so that when the mind becomes purified, the heart may slowly begin to be cleansed as well. A spiritual catharsis may or may not necessitate biological prerequisites. Go read about how Jesus Christ did nothing but fast & pray for 40 days & 40 nights in the wilderness, thereby exhibiting the method for all us sinners to be spiritually strengthened and cleansed.

2-A second reason I STRONGLY DENY that faith is genetically determined is because of my own personal experiences. I went from having very little of it for almost 20 years of my life, then I had a great deal of it for some years, then I had absolutely none for almost 3, and now I have faith again. It doesn’t seem to be, “well since you don’t have it now, you never will”, or “well you have it now so you always will” as you insinuate. And for the record, I know a few people that’ve had similar experiences. How can gene mapping explain away this phenomenon?

Peace be with you.
[/quote]

maybe there is a potentiator gene that kicks in when you are desperate and weak?

[quote]miniross wrote:
maybe there is a potentiator gene that kicks in when you are desperate and weak?[/quote]

As one who relies on scientific evidence to support your unbelief, I find it flagrantly hypocritical of you to offer a concept for thought which has neither been proven nor disproven. A valid question otherwise.

Nonetheless, the only weakness will be your desperate cries as they’re drowned out in the blazing inferno of the abyss where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

“Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand!”

[quote]stellar_horizon wrote:
miniross wrote:
maybe there is a potentiator gene that kicks in when you are desperate and weak?

As one who relies on scientific evidence to support your unbelief, I find it flagrantly hypocritical of you to offer a concept for thought which has neither been proven nor disproven. A valid question otherwise.

Nonetheless, the only weakness will be your desperate cries as they’re drowned out in the blazing inferno of the abyss where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

“Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand!”[/quote]

Lol, right, like there is such thing as heaven and hell. What do you have to support that? Oh, a 2000 year old book? That’s great! We all know that 2000 year old books are the best and most reliable source of information…
:slight_smile:

Stellar, you said:
?There is a reason why Jesus Christ emphatically endorses that all Christians “watch and pray” and that the Bible teaches us to “pray unceasingly”
I?ve got no problem with a teacher saying meditate/pray ? as meditation is an excellent tool to allow the mind to sort and organise recent experiences. I?m also of the opinion that ?one-mindedness? or focusing on the moment is a great way to meditate. However ol? JC was about 3000yrs late in advocating this teaching. The Hindus, Budists and Taoists have a plethora of gods, and have used these methods to achieve transendance for the last 5000yrs. These religions / philosophies had never come to the concept of mono-deisim, yet were experiencing trancendence, thus your assertion that ?This is the way the Creator created for His creations to experience Him? is flawed (unless you acknowledge more than one creator).
The brain has evolved over millions of yrs. Evolution has no goal. That one individual can experience trancendance means nothing, if a group have inherited this amino profile, then there may be a small advantage due to commonality ? ie group cohesion and protection of offspring, enabling further procreation ? thus this characteristic is passed though the generations via inheritance.

1-FAITH IS NOT GENETICALLY DETERMINED ? correct, however an individual with the ?nucleic acid cytosine in one particular spot? WILL be more likely to seek a faith;
“A single change in a single base in the middle of the gene seemed directly related to the ability to feel self-transcendence,” Hamer says. Merely having that feeling did not mean those people would take the next step and translate their transcendence into a belief in?or even a quest for?God. But they seemed likelier to do so than those who never got the feeling at all.?
And if an individual has inherited this nucleic acid/pathway, and is raised up in a group environment (this may be family or temple or neighbourhood) that encourages the seeking of trancendance (whatever the label ? christianity, islam, buddism, etc), then they will be more likely to meditate/prey according to the group teachings, thus they will be likely to experiencing this ?Oneness? (ie ?The frontal lobe is the seat of concentration and attention; the limbic system is where powerful feelings, including rapture, are processed. More revealing is the fact that at the same time these regions flash to life, another important region?the parietal lobe at the back of the brain?goes dim. It’s this lobe that orients the individual in time and space. Take it off-line, and the boundaries of the self fall away, creating the feeling of being at one with the universe. Combine that with what’s going on in the other two lobes, and you can put together a profound religious experience?.). The group environment teachings will thus be ?proven? ? thus we have the passing on of religion and faiths. And it matters not what the religion/faith is.
And all of this is based upon an evolutionary quirk.
According to the above logic, an individual with this genetic inheritance could pray to a leprichaun, amanita muscaria mushroom or the made up entity ?Satan?, and they will have the same ?religious rapture? that a praying nun, mormon or buddist will experience. Physiologically there can be no difference. Thus does this prove that satan and leprichauns exist? You seem to think it proves God exists.

Stellar you said ??Just because science has finally discovered a pathway that religious or spiritual experiences manifest themselves does not mean God had nothing to do with this design. This is the way the Creator created for His creations to experience Him.?
? So what about those who have not inherited this ?nucleic acid cytosine in one particular spot?? Does this mean your Deity rejected them as fetuses, when their brains were developing, when these pathways were being formed?
Of course not. This means of course there is no deity. Mearly inherited characteristics. I would go so far to suppose that the Oneness that meditators experience may simply be contact with their own Id or Ego; the sub and supra-conscious.

You also said ?Humans are composed of 2 elements - the biological & the spiritual.?
Well we?ve just found the seat of the spiritual ? and it?s entirely biologically based.

[quote]folly wrote:
Advocating abstinence is not a bad thing. Have a daughter. You’ll understand. I don’t subscribe to the double standard that is out there about boys and girls. “Yeah, son, go get em!” “No, honey, you should wait until married.” I don’t do that.

My argument is different for homosexuality. I have heard that “it’s not about sex, it’s about love.” I call bullshit on this one. There is this friend of mine. I’ve known him for years. We’ve been through a lot together, and we’re very close. I would even go as far as to say that I love this guy. Does that make me gay? My wife would be pretty surprised about that. She and his wife get along very well. We all get together for dinner. Our kids play together.

Now…if I were to bang him in the ass that would be gay.

Sure, love plays a part in homosexuality, but for the most part, it’s about having sex with a person of the same gender as you.

-folly[/quote]

Cool.
I guess why people think the church’s attitude toward sexuality is anachronistic is because abstinence is the ONLY option that’s advocated - it’s not ‘So look: there’s AIDS, pregnancy, make up your own mind, and here, there’s always condoms in case you decide to do it.’ It’s just a dogmatic: ‘Don’t do it! And by the way, condoms are evil.’

As to your view of homosexuality I’ve got to disagree. Sexuality is determined by who you are able to feel attracted to, romantic love for, and wish to spend your life with. Even if mine and my partners sexual organs were mangled in industrial machinery I would still love him in a way that I could not feel for a female friend.
My 2 cents.
Good thread.

[quote]stellar_horizon wrote:
miniross wrote:
maybe there is a potentiator gene that kicks in when you are desperate and weak?

As one who relies on scientific evidence to support your unbelief, I find it flagrantly hypocritical of you to offer a concept for thought which has neither been proven nor disproven. A valid question otherwise.

Nonetheless, the only weakness will be your desperate cries as they’re drowned out in the blazing inferno of the abyss where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

“Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand!”[/quote]

You see, i was being tongue in cheek with that comment. Of course i dont think thats what happens. I dont even think faith is genetic. It is a means to understand the world around us, humans projecting themselves onto the unknown and scary. all deities tend to be humanised to greater or lesser extents, the are said to have human traits…anger, hate, love.

Is hell a gnashing of teeth, sounds like a night off yer tits on E, moreover, i imagine that someone has been there and returned to apraise us of the situation down there.

What i like is that i geuinely cant believe that there are people out there like you, honestly. this is not a jibe, but in a secular society like Great Britain, to bump into someone like yourself is rare. they ted to knock on your door selling books. seriously, no one ever talks that way.

Now, as it happens, i m off to debauch and sodomise some young filly, to ensure that if i go to hell for being a non believer, i might as well get first class.

[quote]miniross wrote:
You see, i was being tongue in cheek with that comment. Of course i dont think thats what happens. I dont even think faith is genetic. It is a means to understand the world around us, humans projecting themselves onto the unknown and scary. all deities tend to be humanised to greater or lesser extents, the are said to have human traits…anger, hate, love.

Is hell a gnashing of teeth, sounds like a night off yer tits on E, moreover, i imagine that someone has been there and returned to apraise us of the situation down there.

What i like is that i geuinely cant believe that there are people out there like you, honestly. this is not a jibe, but in a secular society like Great Britain, to bump into someone like yourself is rare. they ted to knock on your door selling books. seriously, no one ever talks that way.
[/quote]

Firstly, I was using a phrase [weeping and gnashing of teeth] which is used in the Bible. If you actually read the Gospel according to any of the four authors, you would’ve recognized it. It’s used in a metaphorical sense that there will be great pain & agony for those who failed to change their ways in this life.
Secondly, it’s uncommon for me to use phrases like this for 2 reasons; (1)I lack the poetic capabilities, and (2)it’s more of an ancient way of speaking. Had I presented my admonition in ebonics like, “aint nobody gonna hear you cryin when yo soul is in the hole”, it might not have struck you as awkward.

Orthodox Christians do not go knocking on people’s doors to spread the Faith; that is NOT the way Jesus Christ and His Apostles preached. In their time, there were synagogues and journeys into the wilderness while today, there are Orthodox Christian churches, religious retreats, and visits to monasteries. I don’t know who comes by your house, but I highly doubt they’re Orthodox Christians. My guess would be they’re Jehovah’s witnesses. They come door-to-door in the U.S. as well trying to sell books and interpreting the Bible according to their heretical interpretations.
*This heretical sect [Jehovah’s wintesses] was condmened as such in the First Ecumenical Council of Nicea in 325 AD by the same Orthodox Christian Fathers who canonized the Holy Scriptures. Advise them to research this Council - I don’t think they’ll be pestering you again.

I realize these forums are filled with heretics and blasphemers so my intentions are not to convert any of them, but rather to challenge many of these so-called “proofs” of a godless creation which have mysteriously taken the “holier-than-thou” attitude in our present day and age. If this tug-of-war ends in a draw between myself and some of you unbelievers, as I perceive it has, I remain satisfied. You guys can stick to your beliefs and I’ll stick to mine. Just remember that you aren’t the only logical minds lurking in these forums. In the end, the truth shall be made known to all.

[quote]
Now, as it happens, i m off to debauch and sodomise some young filly, to ensure that if i go to hell for being a non believer, i might as well get first class.[/quote]

St. Matthew 12:37
“For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.”

[quote]Orbitalboner wrote:
Lol, right, like there is such thing as heaven and hell. What do you have to support that? Oh, a 2000 year old book? That’s great! We all know that 2000 year old books are the best and most reliable source of information…
:)[/quote]

As the Christian Faith can neither be proven nor disproven, so it be also with these two spiritual destinations. And the fact that Christians throughout the centuries have hailed a 2000 year old book as holy should tell you this book has stood the test of time.

You fail to remember that many of our sciences today (whether archaeology, sociology, or even history itself) produce landmark advances from ancient manuscripts/texts. Go read Eusebius’ history of the Church written ~1700 years ago. It remains to be the most reliable source of information on Church history and the political sign of the times; in fact, scholars continue to use it as a critical reference point in the fields of theology and history to this day.

Just because something’s old doesn’t mean it can’t be reliable. It’s ok to question but to completely disvalidate something on the sheer basis of age is ludicrous.

[quote]ShaunW wrote:
Stellar, you said:
?There is a reason why Jesus Christ emphatically endorses that all Christians “watch and pray” and that the Bible teaches us to “pray unceasingly”
I?ve got no problem with a teacher saying meditate/pray ? as meditation is an excellent tool to allow the mind to sort and organise recent experiences. I?m also of the opinion that ?one-mindedness? or focusing on the moment is a great way to meditate. However ol? JC was about 3000yrs late in advocating this teaching. The Hindus, Budists and Taoists have a plethora of gods, and have used these methods to achieve transendance for the last 5000yrs. These religions / philosophies had never come to the concept of mono-deisim, yet were experiencing trancendence, thus your assertion that ?This is the way the Creator created for His creations to experience Him? is flawed (unless you acknowledge more than one creator).
[/quote]
*First off, to make your posts easier to read, edit out your question marks, add some spaces, and keep my comments in gray.

Jesus Christ was of the Judaic community. The Jews had been praying centuries before God became incarnate in the flesh. The Jews (the former chosen people of God) were praying not as a result of Hindu or Buddhist teachings, but because they were taught so from the earliest of times by the prophets. Also noteworthy, while the Buddhists and Hindus emphasize transcendental meditation (the clear blank slate), Jews and Christians both strive to establish a direct connection with God by focusing on sin, life in general, hardships, or even simply to thank Him. This is a significant difference. Jews and Christians do not pray as an END but rather as a MEANS of finding God.

Furthermore, just because individuals of polytheistic faiths have profound spiritual experiences does not mean they are actually experiencing God. As someone who is possessed by demons can be classified as having a spiritual experience, so too it be with the Hindus and Buddhists during their hour of transcendental meditation. The spiritual center of the heart, labeled the nous or eye of the soul in the Orthodox Christian tradition, can be manipulated either by demonic energies or by the grace of God. The fact that Buddhists and Hindus learned of the existence of the nous and poison it with demonic energies is quite different than the practice of Orthodox Christians who use the nous to experience God.

Here’s an analogy - God created man with sexual organs. If a man uses his penis to have sex with other men, then he’s abusing the purpose of being endowed with this physical organ. On the other hand, if a man uses his penis to have sex for procreation, then he is correctly using this physical organ. ALL humans are endowed with a nous, but this does NOT imply that (1)all humans shall use it to begin with or (2)when they do, it shall be for the proper function. Orthodox Christians are taught to use the nous for the correct function, to experience God, while the polytheists abuse the nous and experience demons.

to be continued…

No offense guys–I’m not pointing out any individuals, but

stellar is beating you like a red-headed step child. Every time I want to believe one of your arguments, stellar comes back with a vicious upper cut and brings me back to my senses.

Stellar knows The Book. You best pack a lunch if you’re coming to fight him.
In this battle royal–the winner is becoming clearer and clearer.

[quote]sasquatch wrote:
No offense guys–I’m not pointing out any individuals, but

stellar is beating you like a red-headed step child. Every time I want to believe one of your arguments, stellar comes back with a vicious upper cut and brings me back to my senses.

Stellar knows The Book. You best pack a lunch if you’re coming to fight him.

In this battle royal–the winner is becoming clearer and clearer.[/quote]

Have to say i am not disputing what it says in a book, or stellas knowledge.

I would almost be bold enough to state that i dispute the book itself, but morover, for me, i guess i dispute what it stands for, and to me that is written doctrine.

Arguing in this vein is almost like me arguing with jeff the ghost hunter who has a encyclopedic knowledge of all things paranormal, and the crux of my point is that the paranormal is impossible. Whilst i am impressed with the knowledge being expressed here, and its eloquence, the specificity and content is impressive, unfortunately not to one as myself, who is damned before i start.

Guess i better get an asbestos suit on, but these are my opinions, and like all things such as this, there is no agreement. Whethe we will/or will no know in the end is a moot point, as we will either meet in purgatory (i am sure i will be corrected here, so dont bother, it’s cool if i am less than correct)or in fact we doo decompose and thats it (i prefer that, 50 plus years is plenty to be surrunded by people).

it is untestable, therefore most definately moot.

Hy, i may be redheaded but we are fiery.

[quote]stellar_horizon wrote:
Orbitalboner wrote:
Lol, right, like there is such thing as heaven and hell. What do you have to support that? Oh, a 2000 year old book? That’s great! We all know that 2000 year old books are the best and most reliable source of information…
:slight_smile:

As the Christian Faith can neither be proven nor disproven, so it be also with these two spiritual destinations. And the fact that Christians throughout the centuries have hailed a 2000 year old book as holy should tell you this book has stood the test of time.

You fail to remember that many of our sciences today (whether archaeology, sociology, or even history itself) produce landmark advances from ancient manuscripts/texts. Go read Eusebius’ history of the Church written ~1700 years ago. It remains to be the most reliable source of information on Church history and the political sign of the times; in fact, scholars continue to use it as a critical reference point in the fields of theology and history to this day.

Just because something’s old doesn’t mean it can’t be reliable. It’s ok to question but to completely disvalidate something on the sheer basis of age is ludicrous.[/quote]

Stating the following as sciences is really touchy ground…

Sociology, history, archeology.

These are JUST about sciences, and in fact, make a mockery of the word. They may use some scientific principles, but thats it. they are weak.

What about biology, neuroscience, chemistry, physics? These are science. do not get the 2 mixed up.

Bloody hell, its is just about managable to get credible information for something that happens yesterday, so stating that a text is a reliable snap shot of socio political life in the 1700’s is just great. why, because no one knows any different.

bit like lots of other aged texts

[quote]stellar_horizon wrote:
Here’s an analogy - God created man with sexual organs. If a man uses his penis to have sex with other men, then he’s abusing the purpose of being endowed with this physical organ. On the other hand, if a man uses his penis to have sex for procreation, then he is correctly using this physical organ. ALL humans are endowed with a nous, but this does NOT imply that (1)all humans shall use it to begin with or (2)when they do, it shall be for the proper function. Orthodox Christians are taught to use the nous for the correct function, to experience God, while the polytheists abuse the nous and experience demons.

to be continued…[/quote]

OK, so let’s suppose there’s a God - an omniscient and omnipotent being who created the universe and all it’s contents. Do you really think that high on His priorities is precisely where you put your dick and for what reason? That every drop of wasted semen is a slap in His face because all he wants is more of us to war with with each other and fuck up one of his planets?

That some forms of sexuality are ‘evil’ is such a dumb idea it could only have come from man.

I am very well aware that it is jehovas witnesses that come a knocking on the door, it was raised to highlight the fact that contact with ultra religious individuals let alone groups would only come from nieche sectors of our society.