[quote]stellar_horizon wrote:
And for those who want to throw around references in efforts of condoning homosexuality on a biogenetics or sociological level, I’m game. Let’s fight fire with fire. There’s another side to the coin you cunningly fail to mention and in efforts to protect the uneducated public from reading your biased posts and drawing uninformed conclusions, I’ve listed these references below so that a FULL evaluation on the issue may be conducted by intrigued readers.
Paul Cameron, PhD, “Medical Consequences of what Homosexuals Do”
http://www.familyresearchinst.org/FRI_EduPamphlet3.html
RECTAL SEX a.k.a. sodomy
“Surveys indicate that about 90% of gays have engaged in rectal intercourse, and about two-thirds do it regularly. In a 6-month long study of daily sexual diaries, gays averaged 110 sex partners and 68 rectal encounters a year.”
*Also read on how gays use innocent, furry little creatures to fulfill their sexual desires. The grave sins of Sodom & Gomorrah (sodomy & bestiality) are evidently commonplace among homosexuals.
FECAL SEX
“About 80% of gays admit to licking and/or inserting their tongues into the anus of partners and thus ingesting medically significant amounts of feces. Those who eat or wallow in it are probably at even greater risk. In the diary study, 70% of the gays had engaged in this activity - half regularly over 6 months.”
*Like dogs who return to their own vomit… so it is with grave sinners and heinous abominations.
SADOMASOCHISM
“…a large minority of gays engage in torture for sexual fun. Sex with minors 25% of white gays admitted to sex with boys 16 or younger as adults. In a 9-state study, 33% of the 181 male, and 22% of the 18 female teachers caught molesting students did so homosexually (though less than 3% of men and 2% of women engage in homosexuality… and 90% said that they used illegal drugs.”
*Analyzing this statistic it becomes clear that homosexuals, although a substantially smaller minority of the population, are exponentially at risk for molesting children.
John R Diggs, Jr, MD, “The Health Risks of Gay Sex” (pdf file)
http://www.corporateresourcecouncil.org/white_papers/Health_Risks.pdf
“Health and Homosexuality”
http://www.homosexuellt.com/infosida/show_article.asp?Idnr=207
Timothy J Dailey, PhD, “The Negative Health Effects of Homosexuality”
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=IS01B1
Timothy J Dailey, PhD, “Homosexual Parenting: Placing Children at Risk”
http://www.frc.org/index.cfm?i=IS01J3&f=WU05A06&t=e
Timothy J Dailey, PhD, “Comparing the Lifestyles of Homosexual Couples to Married Couples”
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=IS04C02
Timothy J Dailey, PhD, “Ten Arguments from Social Science Research Against Same-Sex Marriage”
*As a veteran in the field of social services, I found this article quite enlightening.
NARTH, “What Do Clinical Studies Say?” (a compilation of links to several reports)
http://www.narth.com/menus/cstudies.html
NARTH, “Born That Way” Theory (a compilation of links to several reports)
http://www.narth.com/menus/born.html
*Bookmark these and forward to your gay or uneducated friends.
“Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand!” May these words continue to echo in my heart as I hope they will in the hearts of homosexuals and all you other readers.
I developed a personal quote years ago which I repeat every so often when it seems I’ve fallen on hard times, am faltering with certain sins, or being tested by God.
Life flashes by in the blink of an eye, but eternity is forever.
-stellar_horizon
Peace be with you all.
[/quote]
Oh my! Stellar you’ve outdone yourself this time. Fellow posters try to believe that Stellar has posted findings from grade A crackpot Dr.Paul Cameron! witness that:
-
At its membership meeting on October 19, 1984, the Nebraska Psychological Association adopted a resolution stating that it "formally disassociates itself from the representations and interpretations of scientific literature offered by Dr. Paul Cameron in his writings and public statements on sexuality."6
-
In 1985, the American Sociological Association (ASA) adopted a resolution which asserted that “Dr. Paul Cameron has consistently misinterpreted and misrepresented sociological research on sexuality, homosexuality, and lesbianism” and noted that "Dr. Paul Cameron has repeatedly campaigned for the abrogation of the civil rights of lesbians and gay men, substantiating his call on the basis of his distorted interpretation of this research."7 The resolution formally charged an ASA committee with the task of “critically evaluating and publicly responding to the work of Dr. Paul Cameron.”
-
At its August, 1986 meeting, the ASA officially accepted the committee’s report and passed the following resolution:
The American Sociological Association officially and publicly states that Paul Cameron is not a sociologist, and condemns his consistent misrepresentation of sociological research. Information on this action and a copy of the report by the Committee on the Status of Homosexuals in Sociology, “The Paul Cameron Case,” is to be published in Footnotes, and be sent to the officers of all regional and state sociological associations and to the Canadian Sociological Association with a request that they alert their members to Cameron’s frequent lecture and media appearances."8
-
Cameron’s credibility was also questioned outside of academia. In his written opinion in Baker v. Wade (1985), Judge Buchmeyer of the U.S. District Court of Dallas referred to “Cameron’s sworn statement that ‘homosexuals abuse children at a proportionately greater incident than do heterosexuals,’” and concluded that “Dr. Paul Cameron…has himself made misrepresentations to this Court” and that “There has been no fraud or misrepresentations except by Dr. Cameron” (p.536).9
for some of the debunking read:
"Distortions and sloppy methods continue to shape Cameron’s studies. As anyone who has taken a statistics class knows, a survey is valid only if the sample it uses is representative of the whole population. Sex surveys pose a particular problem, since many people who normally would be included in a representative sample are loath to discuss their private lives. That, however, hasn’t deterred Cameron from his work.
Consider, for instance, his 1983 ISIS study, a survey of the sexual and social behavior of 4,340 adults in five American cities. Although thousands of heterosexuals allegedly responded to his survey, Cameron could get only forty-one gay men and twenty-four lesbians to respond. The extremely small sample size should have invalidated any conclusions about the sexual behavior of the gay population. In any case, the skewed results of the survey show that Cameron did not get an adequate random sample of heterosexuals either. He claims to have found that 52 percent of male heterosexuals have shoplifted; that 34 percent have committed a crime without being caught; and that 12 percent have either committed or attempted to commit murder. Most people would toss out such a survey, but Cameron published the results in several pamphlets and in “Effect of Homosexuality upon Public Health and Social Order,” an article in Psychological Reports.
In one pamphlet, Murder Violence and Homosexuality, Cameron asserts that you are fifteen times more apt to be killed by a homosexual than by a heterosexual during a sexual murder spree; that homosexuals have committed the most sexual conspiracy murders; and that half of all sex murderers are homosexuals. Cameron based these conclusions on a sample of thirty-four serial killers he selected from the years 1966 to 1983. He stacked the deck not only by including phony figures (he counts in his sample the claims of Henry Lee Lucas, who subsequently recanted his boast that he murdered hundreds of people) but by examining only those serial killers with an apparent sexual motive. This allowed him to include John Wayne Gacy and his victims but to exclude the great majority of serial killers who are heterosexual, according to sociologist Jack Levin, the author of Mass Murder: America’s Growing Menace.
In Cameron’s writings on child molestation-the pamphlet Child Molestation and Homosexuality and two published articles, “Homosexual Molestation of Children/Sexual Interaction of Teacher and Pupil” and "Child Molestation and Homosexuality -he concludes that gays have perpetrated between one-third and one-half of all child molestations; that homosexual teachers have committed between onequarter and four-fifths of all molestations of pupils; and that gays are ten to twenty times more apt to molest children than are heterosexuals. These figures are said to be based on the content of other child molestation studies, yet Cameron has distorted those studies to get the results he wants. For example, he defines all adult male molestation of male children as molestations committed by homosexuals, a definition rejected by the very experts Cameron cites. Groth, among other experts, has explicitly said that most molesters of boys are in fact men who are heterosexual in their adult relationships. These men are attracted to boys, he says, largely because of the feminine characteristics of prepubescents, such as a lack of body hair.
Cameron also has provided anti-gay organizations with research indicating absurdly high rates of extreme sex practices and venereal diseases among gays and lesbians. In his pamphlets on these subjects, Cameron has claimed, for instance, that 29 percent of gay men practice “urine sex” and that 37 percent of gay men have sadomasochistic sex. Gay men, he says, are fourteen times more apt to have syphilis than heterosexual men and are three times more apt to have had lice. Lesbians are said to be nineteen times more apt to have syphilis than straight women and are four times more apt to have had scabies. Cameron’s findings, however, are based on two sources: his discredited 1983 ISIS survey and other studies that ignore random sampling techniques. Several studies Cameron cites to support his conclusions rely on the responses of gay men who were recruited entirely from V.D. clinics.
A Cameron study that has received perhaps the most attention is “The Lifespan of Homosexuals.” It concludes that less than 2 percent of gay men survive to old age; that lesbians have a median age of death of 45; that gays are 116 times more apt to be murdered than straight men and twenty-four times more apt to commit suicide, etc. The source of this material? A comparison of obituaries front gay newspapers with a sample from regular newspapers -a method that would be laughed at by any reputable scholar. Obituaries in gay papers do not accurately portray deaths in the gay population as a whole. They are not meant to provide a public record of deaths of all gays but to allow members of the urban gay community to express mourning for their peers, particularly those whose lives have been cut short by illness or accident. Gays who die outside these communities or who die of natural causes are much less likely to be written tip in a gay paper."
It’s almost too funny that you’d dare to post material conservatives like american spectator won’t even touch! What’s next posting info from Timothy J. Daily? MY GOD! You dared to post this nut’s “findings” too. Have you read his kooky booklet from the FRC? (The Bible and Homosexuality)Here’s a tip to readers–The bible doesn’t say squat about homosexuality, so has anybody from FRC ever read the bible? A thinking man would have to say NO! Next question has Stellar read the bible? Again it seems impossible to square stellar’s logic with the intent of Christ.
25 On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus. "Teacher," he asked, "what must I do to inherit eternal life?"
26 "What is written in the Law?" he replied. "How do you read it?"
27 He answered: "'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind' ; and, 'Love your neighbor as yourself.'"
28 "You have answered correctly," Jesus replied. "Do this and you will live."
29 But he wanted to justify himself, so he asked Jesus, "And who is my neighbor?"
30 In reply Jesus said: "A man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho, when he fell into the hands of robbers. They stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went away, leaving him half dead.
31 "A priest happened to be going down the same road, and when he saw the man, he passed by on the other side.
32 "So too, a Levite, when he came to the place and saw him, passed by on the other side.
33 "But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on him.
34 "He went to him and bandaged his wounds, pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on his own donkey, took him to an inn and took care of him.
35 The next day he took out two silver coins and gave them to the innkeeper. ''Look after him,'' he said, ''and when I return, I will reimburse you for any extra expense you may have.''
36 "Which of these three do you think was a neighbor to the man who fell into the hands of robbers?"
37 The expert in the law replied, "The one who had mercy on him." Jesus told him, "Go and do likewise."
Understand the moral here? Jesus gives stellar ONE single commandment and Stellar is baffled and dazed at what love one another(that’s everybody with no exceptions listed) as I have loved you(that’s unconditionally). Readers note that if Jesus wanted to say something about homosexuals, oral sex, and everything else Jesus could have mentioned it in his ONE commandment. But Jesus never says a word about these things. Also note in the samaritan parable the good neighbor was the samaritan, who were outcasts, pagans, and frowned upon. Stellar…it’s time to quickly return to your bible studies and read the good news!
