<----------- Convinced only 20 people here even lift weights.
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
BONEZ, I don’t think the majority were judging him if he was using, simply saying that by using, that might be a reason for the large biceps compared to the rest of him.
and let’s be honest, he does have large arms for this site, how many guys on here have 16.5-17" arms (guessing) and ripped?
That’s a bit different than someone with a 18" arm with a good amount of fat on the arm.[/quote]
He’s close to 6’ tall. He SHOULD have 16.5" arms (I think theyre bigger btw). His torso is so narrow that it makes his arms look bigger. I’d never bet against him doing a cycle prior to going on the show but I don’t think he is frequent user. His arms would be much bigger, as would the rest of him. And I’m not sure I understand the implication that AAS would make his arms bigger than the rest of him.
Shit my arms aren’t even big on my body and theyre a tad over 17.25 and I’m 5’7. If I stopped training the rest of my body and let it shrink I’m sure it’d make them look much better/bigger[/quote]
I made one statement about noticing guys with NPC LEVELS OF MUSCLE MASS and relating them having huge upper arms yet small forearms to steroid use from very early on in training and people have taken that out of context ever sense…thus why they are now using that for this guy here who is nowhere near muscular enough to match the previous statement.
I am quickly learning that when I even discuss hardcore bodybuilding, I am obviously only speaking to 20 people or less in this site. Everyone else is still walking around thinking 17" arms are FUCKING HIUUUUUUUUGE.
[quote]MangoMan305 wrote:
I thought the guy in the pink was actually caring a gun…[/quote]
Yeah, same here.
[quote]silkyhorse wrote:
[quote]MangoMan305 wrote:
I thought the guy in the pink was actually caring a gun…[/quote]
Yeah, same here.[/quote]
Have you ever seen a real gun before?
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]BONEZ217 wrote:
[quote]jehovasfitness wrote:
BONEZ, I don’t think the majority were judging him if he was using, simply saying that by using, that might be a reason for the large biceps compared to the rest of him.
and let’s be honest, he does have large arms for this site, how many guys on here have 16.5-17" arms (guessing) and ripped?
That’s a bit different than someone with a 18" arm with a good amount of fat on the arm.[/quote]
He’s close to 6’ tall. He SHOULD have 16.5" arms (I think theyre bigger btw). His torso is so narrow that it makes his arms look bigger. I’d never bet against him doing a cycle prior to going on the show but I don’t think he is frequent user. His arms would be much bigger, as would the rest of him. And I’m not sure I understand the implication that AAS would make his arms bigger than the rest of him.
Shit my arms aren’t even big on my body and theyre a tad over 17.25 and I’m 5’7. If I stopped training the rest of my body and let it shrink I’m sure it’d make them look much better/bigger[/quote]
I made one statement about noticing guys with NPC LEVELS OF MUSCLE MASS and relating them having huge upper arms yet small forearms to steroid use from very early on in training and people have taken that out of context ever sense…thus why they are now using that for this guy here who is nowhere near muscular enough to match the previous statement.
I am quickly learning that when I even discuss hardcore bodybuilding, I am obviously only speaking to 20 people or less in this site. Everyone else is still walking around thinking 17" arms are FUCKING HIUUUUUUUUGE.[/quote]
Large and huge are 2 different terms in the context of body size in my opinion. The guy has large arms, period.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]silkyhorse wrote:
[quote]MangoMan305 wrote:
I thought the guy in the pink was actually caring a gun…[/quote]
Yeah, same here.[/quote]
Have you ever seen a real gun before?[/quote]
Seen one, yes, fired one, no. Only fired a rifle when I was in the national home guard.
[quote]silkyhorse wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]silkyhorse wrote:
[quote]MangoMan305 wrote:
I thought the guy in the pink was actually caring a gun…[/quote]
Yeah, same here.[/quote]
Have you ever seen a real gun before?[/quote]
Seen one, yes, fired one, no. Only fired a rifle when I was in the national home guard.[/quote]
You’ve been in the National Guard and mistook a painted graphic on a shirt for a real firearm?
Are you drunk right now?
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]silkyhorse wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]silkyhorse wrote:
[quote]MangoMan305 wrote:
I thought the guy in the pink was actually caring a gun…[/quote]
Yeah, same here.[/quote]
Have you ever seen a real gun before?[/quote]
Seen one, yes, fired one, no. Only fired a rifle when I was in the national home guard.[/quote]
You’ve been in the National Guard and mistook a painted graphic on a shirt for a real firearm?
Are you drunk right now?[/quote]
More like youth national guard. And no, I am not drunk, my screen’s a bit broken and blurry, so I only mistook it for a gun for only a second.
What happened to that rule we made about if you give people on TV’s development shit, then you have to post pics of your own better development.
Also, its a show about 20 year old guys getting drunk at the beach, not a bodybuilding reality show in case anyone didn’t realize.
[quote]stevo_ wrote:
What happened to that rule we made about if you give people on TV’s development shit, then you have to post pics of your own better development.
Also, its a show about 20 year old guys getting drunk at the beach, not a bodybuilding reality show in case anyone didn’t realize.[/quote]
<---------- Wonders what the chances are that the next few pages get filled with forum posters’ personal photos.
[quote]Beast Status wrote:
obvious answer to the bicep situation. 3 letters. GTL baby. GTL. All day…everyday.[/quote]
This. For those you living under a rock, GTL means Gym, Tan, Laundry. “The situation” and Paulie bonded over this daily habit early in the show.
There’s a lot to be said for consistency. Some of us here could learn a thing or two from these douchebags… Jus’ sayin’ brah…
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
This. For those you living under a rock …[/quote]
Really? “This” has reaffirmed that my decision years ago to give up television was exactly the right one.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]stevo_ wrote:
What happened to that rule we made about if you give people on TV’s development shit, then you have to post pics of your own better development.
Also, its a show about 20 year old guys getting drunk at the beach, not a bodybuilding reality show in case anyone didn’t realize.[/quote]
<---------- Wonders what the chances are that the next few pages get filled with forum posters’ personal photos.[/quote]
I also wouldn’t mind a rule where you had to post your W2, or some other life success before you call everyone that is more successful than you a loser.
The jealousy on this site is overwhelming.
I think I just caught the ghey.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Everyone else is still walking around thinking 17" arms are FUCKING HIUUUUUUUUGE.[/quote]
Don’t get me wrong, I was happy to get to 17", but once I did, not as impressive as I’d hoped before.
But I am apparently built like the jolly green giant and will need to be north of 270 to really start to stand out… Which is cool, but a pain in my ass at the same time.
So I’m just hoping 19 looks cooler than 17… 
[quote]stevo_ wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]stevo_ wrote:
What happened to that rule we made about if you give people on TV’s development shit, then you have to post pics of your own better development.
Also, its a show about 20 year old guys getting drunk at the beach, not a bodybuilding reality show in case anyone didn’t realize.[/quote]
<---------- Wonders what the chances are that the next few pages get filled with forum posters’ personal photos.[/quote]
I also wouldn’t mind a rule where you had to post your W2, or some other life success before you call everyone that is more successful than you a loser.
The jealousy on this site is overwhelming.
[/quote]
LOL, that is hilarious…
But people who make real money won’t have an overly impressive W2 compared to other revenue sources. I mean I could post up a picture of people’s W2 who pay more in Medicare than most of this thread makes for salary, but their wages are still dwarfed by other revenue sources. Distributions are a beautiful thing.
(I get what you are saying, and yes I am unnecessarily being a geeky doucher… lol)
[quote]silkyhorse wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]silkyhorse wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]silkyhorse wrote:
[quote]MangoMan305 wrote:
I thought the guy in the pink was actually caring a gun…[/quote]
Yeah, same here.[/quote]
Have you ever seen a real gun before?[/quote]
Seen one, yes, fired one, no. Only fired a rifle when I was in the national home guard.[/quote]
You’ve been in the National Guard and mistook a painted graphic on a shirt for a real firearm?
Are you drunk right now?[/quote]
More like youth national guard. And no, I am not drunk, my screen’s a bit broken and blurry, so I only mistook it for a gun for only a second.[/quote]
LOL, this definitely made my morning.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Distributions are a beautiful thing.
[/quote]
My grandfather, who had a total of a 7th grade education and was a metal lathe guy who became a meat cutter, then discovered stocks and died with an incredibly valuable portfolio (retired when he was 50) said:
“I let my money work so I don’t have to.”
[quote]Professor X wrote:
<----------- Convinced only 20 people here even lift weights.[/quote]
20? Don’t you think you’re being kind of generous?