Israel's Criminal Accomplice

Israel’s Criminal Accomplice
By Paul Craig Roberts
8-2-6

IThere never was any doubt of the Bush Regime’s complicity in Israel’s naked aggression against the Lebanese civilian population. Bush has protected Israel from world condemnation. Bush has blocked those who attempted to bring a stop to Israel’s bombing of residential neighborhoods and civilian infrastructure, and now Bush rushes more bombs for Israel to drop on Lebanon.

On July 22, the New York Times revealed the full extent of the Bush Regime’s participation in the heinous war crimes being inflicted on the Lebanese people: “The Bush administration is rushing a delivery of precision-guided bombs to Israel, which requested the expedited shipment last week after beginning its air campaign. . . . The decision to quickly ship the weapons to Israel was made with relatively little debate within the Bush administration, the officials said.”

Obviously, Bush and his government do not think Israel has yet murdered enough Lebanese. Bush denounces Syria and Iran for allegedly arming Hezbollah, while he rushes more deadly weapons to Israel.

The entire world is appalled at the Bush Regime’s support for Israel’s policy of expanding its borders through naked aggression.

Every Arab and Muslim now knows that the US is Israel’s enabler. Arab hopes are dead that the US will pressure Israel to behave more humanely toward people not armed with American fighter planes, tanks, and high explosives.

America’s complicity in Israel’s war crimes is more than America’s UK lapdog can stand. According to the French news service, AFP, “The United States is starting to look isolated in its refusal to rein in Israel’s attacks on Lebanon with key ally Britain criticizing the wholesale killing of Lebanese civilians and widespread destruction.”

AFP reports that Britain’s deputy foreign minister Kim Howells “questioned Israel’s military tactics and slammed Israel’s killing of ‘so many children and so many people. If Israel is chasing Hezbollah, then go for Hezbollah. You don’t go for the entire Lebanese nation.’”

But is Israel after Hezbollah or is Israel after the real estate that comprises southern Lebanon?

Rightwing Israelis say Israel needs southern Lebanon as a buffer against Hezbollah. If Israel were to succeed in driving Hezbollah out of southern Lebanon, Israel would then want a buffer for southern Lebanon, where Israeli settlements would quickly spring up, And after that buffer, another, just as Israel has gobbled up Palestine.

The American people need to understand what everyone else in the world understands: The Bush Regime is empowering the Israeli state to push out its borders by stealing land from other people.

This Israeli policy is the source of the Middle East conflict.

It is ignorant and immoral to blame the conflict on Hamas and Hezbollah. These organizations were created by Israeli aggression. Lacking American jet fighters, tanks, ordinance, and resupply, these organizations resort to terror, which is the only weapon that they have. Otherwise, the world would pay no attention as Arabs are ground under by Israeli expansion.

The fault is America’s more than Israel’s. The American government and the brainwashed American public are the source of the conflict. If America did not enable Israeli aggression, Israel would have to behave responsibly and endeavor to co-exist with its neighbors.

Israel is an artificial state created in Arab lands by European colonial powers after World War II. Instead of working to win acceptance and overcoming Arab hostility to Europe shipping off “the Jewish problem” to the Middle East, Israel has antagonized its Middle East neighbors. Israel can play the bully-boy role, because the US acts as Israel’s big brother. With its policy of fang and claw, Israel endangers its own right to exist.

Many distinguished Israelis came to this conclusion long before I did. I am only repeating what can be read in more eloquent writings of distinguished Israelis.

Israel’s greatest friends are its own peace movement and those few in America who dare to criticize Israel’s self-destructive policies. It is not anti-semitic to hold Israel to the same standards as other civilized countries or to report facts instead of Israeli propaganda.

Israel’s greatest enemies are the American neoconservatives, who hold the power in the Bush Regime. What we are witnessing in the Middle East is the unfolding of the neocon plan to destroy all vestiges of Arab/Muslim independence and to remove all opposition to Israel’s agenda. Can five million Israelis, even when backed by the United States, forever suppress hundreds of millions of humiliated Muslims stewing in their humiliation?

This is a recipe for perpetual conflict and the eventual destruction of Israel.

Neocons believe that deception of the American public is a legitimate way for them to achieve their plan. Bush’s so-called “war on terror” is the cloak for neocon deception.

Bush’s war is not on terror. Bush’s war is on Muslim states not ruled by American puppets.


Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. He is coauthor of The Tyranny of Good Intentions.

Go away you F’ing idiot!

[quote]Marmadogg wrote:
Go away you F’ing idiot![/quote]

stop bothering the morans

I’m just about to read this. I’d like to point out that no-one will gain ANYTHING, whatever your opinion, by posting journalists opinions on the subject. I, justthefacts, zap, some others, post historical quotes that are extremely illuminating as they are either narratives by historians respected by their peers (if you believe i quote out of context, your wrong. It’s out of YOUR schema) or actual quotes that show the ideology of leaders and policy-makers.

Personally i believe the most illuminating quotes would be a series of quotes by a) Sayid Qutb, and then showing how this has evolved into the discourses of radical islamic terrorist groups, and b) by Theodor Herzl (and Ben Gurion) which will show the Jewish attitude is just as nasty.

We surely have a problem if one person quotes ‘jews are bad’ and another quotes ‘terrorists are bad’ because we only become more entrenched in a polar argument (not arguing about snow and bears)

You article-
3rd para- 2nd sentence- IS TRUE

4th para- an assumption, biased

5th para- This is fairly true i think. The USA could obviously stop at least one side of the violence. The arabs are free to act. But choices are obviously restricted.

Kim Howells made agood point. But he’s about as senior as ‘asst. wall painter to Berlin, 1987’. What will he achieve alone? Nothing

This [quote] But is Israel after Hezbollah or is Israel after the real estate that comprises southern Lebanon?[/quote] would be ridiculous if Israel wasn’t still occupying so much land. It looks suspicious now.

Next para- no comment

Next para- no comment

Hamas and hezbollah were literally created by Israel- they sponsored them when it was suitable, to destabilise the PLO. Another example of the resistance just enduring

While many have claimed this, or disputed it, i think it’s a fair point. There have been no treaties at which Israel was not the special little prince of the leaders, USA. One day diplomacy will have to happen. There will never come a time when Israel, or arab states will not exist. Their interests need to be conciled (not by open-mouth kissing)

Next para- anyone who knows knows this is true, though it’s couched in biased phraseology

there are many Israelis who don’t agree with Zionist expansion- they were just born there. They want no part in the war. But their opinions are marginalised as the strong and corrupt are often in power.
http://www.T-Nation.com/index.jsp

I say no, so want the war to stop, as much for the dissenting Israelis as for the innocent arabs. But some want to just turn up the heat.

What an intelligent point you made marmadogg. Let me reply-

Why not think, and realise that some fact is presented here, only the conclusions are askew from your own. But the experimental data has shown that the situation will not stabilise, the arabs will not just be subdued and crushed. They will forever command more desperate and deadly menas to achieve freedom from the injustices that you’d know about if you read some. Not to say these deadly means aren’t wrong, and evil.

But to punish the arabs for their evil resistance, and not to take back east jerusalem etc, is an example of bias, which will i expect entrench opinion against us, and the west will have chosen sides, in a grey conflict.

Look at this

Israel was made- arabs attacked- Israel humiliated/ destroyed arabs- arabs attacked- Israel destroyed arabs- Israel stole land- Arabs tried diplomacy- Israel was unreasonable- arabs attacked- Israel crushed arabs- Intifada- Israel crushed arabs- negotiations- Israeli defence minister singularly provoked Al Aqsa- Israel crushed arabs- fighting continues to this day…

This suggests we are confused if we believe more war is the answer. Yes, there are some cunts (on the arab side this time) who will attack even when diplomacy is going on. They need to get got. I’m all for these fuckers getting fucked.

Like i said, the motivations of terrorism are- a) draw attention b) get sympathy from your native population c) hurt the enemy. The C option is ridiculous, and impossible for arab terrorists. A is done. We’re talking about it. It’s only through their continued violence that appears totallu irrational to the ignorant observer, that Israel have an excuse to keep the land, and bomb the shit out of countries. B motivation is dubious. Arab terrorists are murdering for freedom, let’s be in no doubt. But Israel are murdering for neocolonial imposition, no doubt either. And they’re in the west’s corner.

But if you cripple a whole nation, in lieue (sp?) of negotiation for this reason alone, you are evil. Most people want resolution. Most gazans want water. Most lebanese want roads. etc

[quote]Wreckless wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
Go away you F’ing idiot!

stop bothering the morans

http://www.bartcop.com/tom-rwoverse.jpg[/quote]

nice link!

[quote]dannyrat wrote:
I’m just about to read this. I’d like to point out that no-one will gain ANYTHING, whatever your opinion, by posting journalists opinions on the subject. I, justthefacts, zap, some others, post historical quotes that are extremely illuminating as they are either narratives by historians respected by their peers (if you believe i quote out of context, your wrong. It’s out of YOUR schema) or actual quotes that show the ideology of leaders and policy-makers.

Personally i believe the most illuminating quotes would be a series of quotes by a) Sayid Qutb, and then showing how this has evolved into the discourses of radical islamic terrorist groups, and b) by Theodor Herzl (and Ben Gurion) which will show the Jewish attitude is just as nasty.

We surely have a problem if one person quotes ‘jews are bad’ and another quotes ‘terrorists are bad’ because we only become more entrenched in a polar argument (not arguing about snow and bears)

You article-
3rd para- 2nd sentence- IS TRUE

4th para- an assumption, biased

5th para- This is fairly true i think. The USA could obviously stop at least one side of the violence. The arabs are free to act. But choices are obviously restricted.

Kim Howells made agood point. But he’s about as senior as ‘asst. wall painter to Berlin, 1987’. What will he achieve alone? Nothing

This But is Israel after Hezbollah or is Israel after the real estate that comprises southern Lebanon? would be ridiculous if Israel wasn’t still occupying so much land. It looks suspicious now.

Next para- no comment

Next para- no comment

Hamas and hezbollah were literally created by Israel- they sponsored them when it was suitable, to destabilise the PLO. Another example of the resistance just enduring

The American government and the brainwashed American public are the source of the conflict. If America did not enable Israeli aggression, Israel would have to behave responsibly and endeavor to co-exist with its neighbors.

While many have claimed this, or disputed it, i think it’s a fair point. There have been no treaties at which Israel was not the special little prince of the leaders, USA. One day diplomacy will have to happen. There will never come a time when Israel, or arab states will not exist. Their interests need to be conciled (not by open-mouth kissing)

Next para- anyone who knows knows this is true, though it’s couched in biased phraseology

there are many Israelis who don’t agree with Zionist expansion- they were just born there. They want no part in the war. But their opinions are marginalised as the strong and corrupt are often in power.
http://www.T-Nation.com/index.jsp

Can five million Israelis, even when backed by the United States, forever suppress hundreds of millions of humiliated Muslims stewing in their humiliation?

I say no, so want the war to stop, as much for the dissenting Israelis as for the innocent arabs. But some want to just turn up the heat.

What an intelligent point you made marmadogg. Let me reply-

Why not think, and realise that some fact is presented here, only the conclusions are askew from your own. But the experimental data has shown that the situation will not stabilise, the arabs will not just be subdued and crushed. They will forever command more desperate and deadly menas to achieve freedom from the injustices that you’d know about if you read some. Not to say these deadly means aren’t wrong, and evil.

But to punish the arabs for their evil resistance, and not to take back east jerusalem etc, is an example of bias, which will i expect entrench opinion against us, and the west will have chosen sides, in a grey conflict.

Look at this

Israel was made- arabs attacked- Israel humiliated/ destroyed arabs- arabs attacked- Israel destroyed arabs- Israel stole land- Arabs tried diplomacy- Israel was unreasonable- arabs attacked- Israel crushed arabs- Intifada- Israel crushed arabs- negotiations- Israeli defence minister singularly provoked Al Aqsa- Israel crushed arabs- fighting continues to this day…

This suggests we are confused if we believe more war is the answer. Yes, there are some cunts (on the arab side this time) who will attack even when diplomacy is going on. They need to get got. I’m all for these fuckers getting fucked.

Like i said, the motivations of terrorism are- a) draw attention b) get sympathy from your native population c) hurt the enemy. The C option is ridiculous, and impossible for arab terrorists. A is done. We’re talking about it. It’s only through their continued violence that appears totallu irrational to the ignorant observer, that Israel have an excuse to keep the land, and bomb the shit out of countries. B motivation is dubious. Arab terrorists are murdering for freedom, let’s be in no doubt. But Israel are murdering for neocolonial imposition, no doubt either. And they’re in the west’s corner.

But if you cripple a whole nation, in lieue (sp?) of negotiation for this reason alone, you are evil. Most people want resolution. Most gazans want water. Most lebanese want roads. etc

[/quote]

what fucking business do you have on this forum sonny?? I’m sure there’s a banner at the top which says “name calling and uninformed views only”. Get the hell off.

“Every Arab and Muslim now knows that the US is Israel’s enabler. Arab hopes are dead that the US will pressure Israel to behave more humanely toward people not armed with American fighter planes, tanks, and high explosives.”

Yea, poor little Hizbullah. Vicims of naked Ireali aggresion while just doing the saintly work of a higher power.

Bigflamer sniffles and wipes a solitarty tear from his eye

[quote]Wreckless wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
Go away you F’ing idiot!

stop bothering the morans

http://www.bartcop.com/tom-rwoverse.jpg[/quote]

It’s MORONS, not MORANS! Sheessssh!

That article is such a joke. My head is spinning trying to find a place to begin.

Damn.

[quote]Marmadogg wrote:
Go away you F’ing idiot![/quote]

AAAhhhh…the weak always resort to insults…

[quote]juninho wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
Go away you F’ing idiot!

stop bothering the morans

nice link![/quote]

You could not be any more of a left wingnut.

Bartcop…pathetic.

http://images.t-nation.com/forum_images/7/e/7e511-image015.jpg

[quote]ALDurr wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
Go away you F’ing idiot!

stop bothering the morans

It’s MORONS, not MORANS! Sheessssh![/quote]

The left wingnut is refering to this picture of this right wingnut.

It make me wonder if Wreckless and his pals are paid by the DU’mmies or MoveOn to post here?

[quote]Marmadogg wrote:
juninho wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
Go away you F’ing idiot!

stop bothering the morans

nice link!

You could not be any more of a left wingnut.

Bartcop…pathetic.[/quote]

lol @ ‘left wing’ being used as an insult.

[quote]juninho wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
juninho wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
Go away you F’ing idiot!

stop bothering the morans

nice link!

You could not be any more of a left wingnut.

Bartcop…pathetic.

lol @ ‘left wing’ being used as an insult.
[/quote]

Left wingnut (not left wing).

It means being way out of touch with the rest of America.

We have right wingnuts here too and I call them out as well.

[quote]Wreckless wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
Go away you F’ing idiot!

stop bothering the morans

http://www.bartcop.com/tom-rwoverse.jpg[/quote]

Love that line:
“Can you imagine the looks of gratitude on the survivors’ faces?”

[quote]bigflamer wrote:
That article is such a joke. My head is spinning trying to find a place to begin.

Damn.[/quote]

How about starting from the top:

EU Poll Names Israel Greatest Threat to World Peace
Senior Israeli leaders have condemned the Eurobarometer poll released on Monday that suggested that 59 percent of EU citizens see Israel as a bigger menace to the world than Iran, Iraq or North Korea.

Poll: Israel and US Biggest Threats to World Peace
EUobserver
October 30, 2003
EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - Over half of Europeans think that Israel now presents the biggest threat to world peace according to a controversial poll requested by the European Commission.

According to the same survey, Europeans believe the United States contributes the most to world instability along with Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq and North Korea…
http://www.twf.org/News/Y2003/1031-Poll.html

Tide of Arab Opinion Turns to Support for Hezbollah
New York Times
July 28, 2006
DAMASCUS, Syria - At the onset of the Lebanese crisis, Arab governments, starting with Saudi Arabia, slammed Hezbollah for recklessly provoking a war, providing what the United States and Israel took as a wink and a nod to continue the fight.

Now, with hundreds of Lebanese dead and Hezbollah holding out against the vaunted Israeli military for more than two weeks, the tide of public opinion across the Arab world is surging behind the organization, transforming the Shiite group’s leader, Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, into a folk hero and forcing a change in official statements.

The Saudi royal family and King Abdullah II of Jordan, who were initially more worried about the rising power of Shiite Iran, Hezbollah’s main sponsor, are scrambling to distance themselves from Washington…
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0728-01.htm

AIPAC’s Dangerous Grip on Washington
On July 18, the Senate unanimously approved a nonbinding resolution “condemning Hamas and Hezbollah and their state sponsors and supporting Israel’s exercise of its right to self-defense.” After House majority leader John Boehner removed language from the bill urging “all sides to protect innocent civilian life and infrastructure,” the House version passed by a landslide, 410 to 8.

AIPAC not only lobbied for the resolution; it had written it. “They [Congress] were given a resolution by AIPAC,” said former Carter Administration National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, who addressed the House Democratic Caucus on July 19. “They didn’t prepare one.”

AIPAC is the leading player in what is sometimes referred to as “The Israel Lobby” – a coalition that includes major Jewish groups, neoconservative intellectuals and Christian Zionists. With its impressive contacts among Hill staffers, influential grassroots supporters and deep connections to wealthy donors, AIPAC is the lobby’s key emissary to Congress. But in many ways, AIPAC has become greater than just another lobby; its work has made unconditional support for Israel an accepted cost of doing business inside the halls of Congress…
http://www.alternet.org/module/printversion/39679

9/11 Commission Chairmen Admit Whitewashing the Cause of the Attacks
August 7, 2006
The book usefully details the administration’s willful misrepresentation of its incompetent actions that day, but makes the shocking admission that some commission members deliberately wanted to distort an even more important issue.

Apparently, unidentified commissioners wanted to cover up the fact that U.S. support for Israel was one of the motivating factors behind al Qaeda’s 9/11 attack.

10X worse for the US than the next inevitable terrorist attack will be $5.00+/gallon gasoline.

It’s time to dump this LOAD - ISRAEL IS NOT OUR ALLY.

[quote]JustTheFacts wrote:
bigflamer wrote:
That article is such a joke. My head is spinning trying to find a place to begin.

Damn.

How about starting from the top:

EU Poll Names Israel Greatest Threat to World Peace
Senior Israeli leaders have condemned the Eurobarometer poll released on Monday that suggested that 59 percent of EU citizens see Israel as a bigger menace to the world than Iran, Iraq or North Korea.

Poll: Israel and US Biggest Threats to World Peace
EUobserver
October 30, 2003
EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - Over half of Europeans think that Israel now presents the biggest threat to world peace according to a controversial poll requested by the European Commission.

According to the same survey, Europeans believe the United States contributes the most to world instability along with Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq and North Korea…
http://www.twf.org/News/Y2003/1031-Poll.html

Tide of Arab Opinion Turns to Support for Hezbollah
New York Times
July 28, 2006
DAMASCUS, Syria - At the onset of the Lebanese crisis, Arab governments, starting with Saudi Arabia, slammed Hezbollah for recklessly provoking a war, providing what the United States and Israel took as a wink and a nod to continue the fight.

Now, with hundreds of Lebanese dead and Hezbollah holding out against the vaunted Israeli military for more than two weeks, the tide of public opinion across the Arab world is surging behind the organization, transforming the Shiite group’s leader, Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, into a folk hero and forcing a change in official statements.

The Saudi royal family and King Abdullah II of Jordan, who were initially more worried about the rising power of Shiite Iran, Hezbollah’s main sponsor, are scrambling to distance themselves from Washington…
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0728-01.htm

AIPAC’s Dangerous Grip on Washington
On July 18, the Senate unanimously approved a nonbinding resolution “condemning Hamas and Hezbollah and their state sponsors and supporting Israel’s exercise of its right to self-defense.” After House majority leader John Boehner removed language from the bill urging “all sides to protect innocent civilian life and infrastructure,” the House version passed by a landslide, 410 to 8.

AIPAC not only lobbied for the resolution; it had written it. “They [Congress] were given a resolution by AIPAC,” said former Carter Administration National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, who addressed the House Democratic Caucus on July 19. “They didn’t prepare one.”

AIPAC is the leading player in what is sometimes referred to as “The Israel Lobby” – a coalition that includes major Jewish groups, neoconservative intellectuals and Christian Zionists. With its impressive contacts among Hill staffers, influential grassroots supporters and deep connections to wealthy donors, AIPAC is the lobby’s key emissary to Congress. But in many ways, AIPAC has become greater than just another lobby; its work has made unconditional support for Israel an accepted cost of doing business inside the halls of Congress…
http://www.alternet.org/module/printversion/39679

9/11 Commission Chairmen Admit Whitewashing the Cause of the Attacks
August 7, 2006
The book usefully details the administration’s willful misrepresentation of its incompetent actions that day, but makes the shocking admission that some commission members deliberately wanted to distort an even more important issue.

Apparently, unidentified commissioners wanted to cover up the fact that U.S. support for Israel was one of the motivating factors behind al Qaeda’s 9/11 attack.

10X worse for the US than the next inevitable terrorist attack will be $5.00+/gallon gasoline.

It’s time to dump this LOAD - ISRAEL IS NOT OUR ALLY.
[/quote]

Wow, I’m surprised Harris hasn’t posted yet calling you a neo-nazi.

I agree though, the U.S. has given Israel plenty of monetary and military aid.

They can handle their own problems.

Dustin

[quote]Dustin wrote:
JustTheFacts wrote:
bigflamer wrote:
That article is such a joke. My head is spinning trying to find a place to begin.

Damn.

How about starting from the top:

EU Poll Names Israel Greatest Threat to World Peace
Senior Israeli leaders have condemned the Eurobarometer poll released on Monday that suggested that 59 percent of EU citizens see Israel as a bigger menace to the world than Iran, Iraq or North Korea.

Poll: Israel and US Biggest Threats to World Peace
EUobserver
October 30, 2003
EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - Over half of Europeans think that Israel now presents the biggest threat to world peace according to a controversial poll requested by the European Commission.

According to the same survey, Europeans believe the United States contributes the most to world instability along with Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq and North Korea…
http://www.twf.org/News/Y2003/1031-Poll.html

Tide of Arab Opinion Turns to Support for Hezbollah
New York Times
July 28, 2006
DAMASCUS, Syria - At the onset of the Lebanese crisis, Arab governments, starting with Saudi Arabia, slammed Hezbollah for recklessly provoking a war, providing what the United States and Israel took as a wink and a nod to continue the fight.

Now, with hundreds of Lebanese dead and Hezbollah holding out against the vaunted Israeli military for more than two weeks, the tide of public opinion across the Arab world is surging behind the organization, transforming the Shiite group’s leader, Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, into a folk hero and forcing a change in official statements.

The Saudi royal family and King Abdullah II of Jordan, who were initially more worried about the rising power of Shiite Iran, Hezbollah’s main sponsor, are scrambling to distance themselves from Washington…
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0728-01.htm

AIPAC’s Dangerous Grip on Washington
On July 18, the Senate unanimously approved a nonbinding resolution “condemning Hamas and Hezbollah and their state sponsors and supporting Israel’s exercise of its right to self-defense.” After House majority leader John Boehner removed language from the bill urging “all sides to protect innocent civilian life and infrastructure,” the House version passed by a landslide, 410 to 8.

AIPAC not only lobbied for the resolution; it had written it. “They [Congress] were given a resolution by AIPAC,” said former Carter Administration National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, who addressed the House Democratic Caucus on July 19. “They didn’t prepare one.”

AIPAC is the leading player in what is sometimes referred to as “The Israel Lobby” – a coalition that includes major Jewish groups, neoconservative intellectuals and Christian Zionists. With its impressive contacts among Hill staffers, influential grassroots supporters and deep connections to wealthy donors, AIPAC is the lobby’s key emissary to Congress. But in many ways, AIPAC has become greater than just another lobby; its work has made unconditional support for Israel an accepted cost of doing business inside the halls of Congress…
http://www.alternet.org/module/printversion/39679

9/11 Commission Chairmen Admit Whitewashing the Cause of the Attacks
August 7, 2006
The book usefully details the administration’s willful misrepresentation of its incompetent actions that day, but makes the shocking admission that some commission members deliberately wanted to distort an even more important issue.

Apparently, unidentified commissioners wanted to cover up the fact that U.S. support for Israel was one of the motivating factors behind al Qaeda’s 9/11 attack.

10X worse for the US than the next inevitable terrorist attack will be $5.00+/gallon gasoline.

It’s time to dump this LOAD - ISRAEL IS NOT OUR ALLY.

Wow, I’m surprised Harris hasn’t posted yet calling you a neo-nazi.

I agree though, the U.S. has given Israel plenty of monetary and military aid.

They can handle their own problems.

Dustin
[/quote]

No. He didn’t have an avatar with two racist symbols that he changed to one with an anti-gay slur.

You really think I’m gonna let you post without reminding everyone what kind of person you are?

[quote]Marmadogg wrote:
juninho wrote:
Wreckless wrote:
Marmadogg wrote:
Go away you F’ing idiot!

stop bothering the morans

nice link!

You could not be any more of a left wingnut.

Bartcop…pathetic.[/quote]

An incovenient truth ? ? ?

[quote]harris447 wrote:

You really think I’m gonna let you post without reminding everyone what kind of person you are?

[/quote]

I believe you used the word “faggots” to describe gay men in the Brokeback thread. I don’t recall ever using that word.

I don’t care what you do. Make it your life’s work, because you obviously don’t have a life.

You have some obsession with me. I think its kind of cool to have someone stalking my posts.

You accuse me of being hateful, yet you have used almost every personal attack in “debates” with forum members on this site.

Dustin