Islamic Terror Won't Go Away

It is more than one Akbar, which is the problem. It is whole segregated communities of Akbars who don’t talk to cops, and harbour ill intent to the UK.

Name a terror group the UK has funded.

Yes, they knew. But nothing he did was illegal until he recruited for a terror group. Even that required a legal change that was aimed at him. We don’t just arrest people for being odious.

1 Like

Not sure if this is a serious question?

We’ve been responsible for funding Taliban, Alqaeda, Isis either directly or indirectly the list is longer than you can imagine.
We have almost always exclusively funded militant minority groups for our benefit.

On a side note, thank you for being civil it is a rarity around here.

You’re very welcome. It is kind of you to say. The more substantive of your points I will have to return to at a later point.

Lets say there is a disease and 1 in 4 of the world gets infected.
Out of the quarter infected 1 in 1000 gets sick at random.
So 1 in 4000 get sick from the disease.
Do you wait for someone to get sick and then deal with them or do you cure all the disease for everyone so no one gets sick?

You can change the numbers and apply this to all different problems.
I’m applying it to Islam.

While I think the OP is wrong and a moron, he has a point in saying this sort of thing won’t go away. With the IRA, what they wanted- home rule for Ireland- was relatively reasonable and we could negotiate and come to some sort of arrangement. What these pricks want, on the other hand, is fundamentally unreasonable and we can’t and shouldn’t be prepared to give it to them in any way shape or form. So short of finding and imprisoning or killing absolutely every single person who supports islamic extremism, there’s no way this can ever come to an end.

So are we supposed to deal with it and accept it being part of City life as Khan suggests?
Are we meant to just sit around and wait for another terror attack then:

Do this?

Are you seriously advocating for the eradication of 23% of the global population?

No, I’m advocating for something to be done about the fundamental flaws with Islam.
I’m not suggesting we kill every Muslim but we do something about the issues raised in their book and the instructions it states.
People are sensible enough most of the time for the more ludicrous teachings and examples to be set to be not followed.
No Christian follows Leviticus 11:9-12, despite it being in the Bible.
Unfortunately some Muslims are not able to comprehend that their book is flawed so follow it exactly.
Therefore the book should be changed, while keeping most teachings intact.
Those who oppose the changes, such as removing the infidel killing parts, shouldn’t be allowed into the West at all.

These ideologies are not compatible with Modern Western Values.

1 Like

This is something people like ussmcds and other cultural Marxists don’t understand.

The Constitution / monarchy are meaningless if the people they’re meant to govern don’t believe in those principles.

Once their numbers get big enough they’ll just replace them with their values

1 Like

As usual, you’re fucking clueless.

Having people who want equal rights for Homosexuals and people who want to throw Homosexuals of buildings in the same country will not, and will never work.

I don’t understand why people continue to get mad at those who want to solve the problem here.

Either one group changes their values or they don’t co exist.

1 Like

Remember, you’re talking to a guy who has tried to pick apart this very idea that the First Amendment actually protects freedom of religion, but instead believes that the Founding Fathers wrote this passage specifically to create a society of white Christians.

How did I pick it apart? But yes I do believe the intention of the Founding Fathers was to create a white Christian nation

Ummmm, a whole lot of Jews do.

You honestly think that forcibly changing the Quran will stop radicalism?

Neither are many Christian values. Hell, neither are most of the founding principles of the US…

You aren’t solving the problem. In all likelihood, you’re actually making it worse.

Look, I fully support killing every radical extremist we can find. I’m all for it. Hell, I’m happy to help. However, you’re naive if you think forcibly changing their Holy book will result in a reduction in radicalism.

Ya, I remember, unfortunately…

One thing people forget to acknowledge about America is not just what was achieved, but how fast it all came together.

What took England ~ 1000 years took America only 200.

But what came together quickly can unravel just as fast. Will America survive if discordant elements are continually introduced?

1 Like

I had Muslim friends in college. My favorite prof of all time was a Kuwaiti Muslim. But for how little me and my loved ones interact with Muslims in our lives, people of that faith have caused us great grief.

No. Obviously, the security services have to do their jobs and try their best to stop this happening. It shouldn’t be a permission slip for xenophobia and homegrown extremism though. That’s exactly what they want. And as for changing the culture of islam, have you not noticed that muslims themselves are speaking out against this sort of thing? Most of the people these fuckers kill are muslims who don’t agree with them, after all.

What is going to take for you to realize that the ultimate goal of Islam is one world UNDER Islam?

A lobotomy

What’s it going to take for you to realize that most individual Muslim’s, like pretty much everyone else, just want to be left alone to live their lives?

I don’t really care what “their” goal is. What matters is can they actually accomplish it. The closest they ever got was via the Ottoman Empire. It failed. It doesn’t exist. There is no caliphate. I can sit here and list 100 reasons why Islam taking over is about as far fetched as they come.

Sorry not sorry that I don’t support jumping up and down on the Constitution because some people are afraid of the boogie man Muslim 4,000 miles away.

2 Likes