I’ve been looking into things such as SARMs and the general consensus seems to be, mild SARMs like Osta don’t require PCT although Arimistane is advised to be on the safe side but Stronger SARMs do require a full PCT of Nolvadex and or Clomid. But as these drugs are prescription only whereas the stronger SARMs are not, so how on earth could people taking SARMs get full a PCT. If one of the pros of SARMs is the legality, doesn’t requiring a full PCT negate that pro? Thoughts?
A controlled substance is usually different than something that requires a prescription, legally speaking.
Depending on country you can probably get research chemicals that are simply Nolvadex or clomid suspended in water. So no prescription needed.
I think the reason SARMs appeal is of course they are not illegal but you also don’t have to inject them. Some people can’t inject themselves and some countries needles are harder to get than the bottle of steroids. The other appeal in my mind is simply they are NOT steroids, even people that visit this site believe that fear mongering medial reports about steroids.
1 Like
Thanks, I also hate the idea of injecting and I think SARMs can be a step into PEDs without jumping in. Although I have found it very difficult to find Nolvadex. Typically you get BS ‘Natural Test Boosters’ with a name similar like Nolovadex or something
Can you get away with no pct and should you are two different questions. If SARMs require a full scale pct—which, look, some do—then they offer no real advantage to the user. Given the choice between using LGD for eight weeks with no test base or dbol for the same length at a lower dose, the dbol wins every time. Both require a real pct, both are kind of a bad idea solo. But one of them is a less-stupid thing to do. You get what I’m saying?
2 Likes
Thanks, I get what you’re saying but the legality of getting hold of such things is also where SARMs come in… unless of course you can’t get hold of the required PCT. But yeah I have thought that LGD and RAD140 don’t seem to provide much benefit if they require a PCT.
At some point you’re going to cross over from grey-market supplements to the dark side. It’s inevitable once you start down that road. SARMs give you a taste of what could be done with the proper compounds coupled with the right training and diet. From there it’s hard to see guys resisting that next level.
So if you don’t want to break the law (and good for you; you’re smarter that way) then I’d say being a true natty is your only shot. Because I don’t believe ostarine is worth the suppression and LGD and RAD really are heavier duty. Aside from getting some designer stuff from the UK and then just stopping cold turkey (not recommended) you don’t have many options.
1 Like
Nice food for thought, cheers
Ride that needle bitch! 
Seriously, it really is not that big of a deal and, after the first few times, it becomes rather ordinary.
2 Likes
Just finished watching the latest SARMageddon YT video and the guy posted his bloodwork. He was on 2-3 SARMs only and dude was very suppressed, TT dropped to like 150ng. I would think you’d have to run a PCT after something like that.