Are these the only two options? Could it also be that your writing is poor? My response is in the form of doubt, and asking for clarification. Should be obvious.
Nothing to disagree with on this point, Trump was talking about how Hillary would start a war with Iran if she won and now look what happened.
I’m seeing what I see. The Dems go after Trump for minor stuff, but if they dig a little deeper there are very serious things they could use against him. Like him talking about grabbing pussies is just some nonsense that got recorded by accident, but there is at least one girl who claims Trump raped her when she was underage at Epstein’s place.
From what I see, this extreme polarization that we now have started just before the last election. Everyone was relatively moderate up to then, then politics just went totally crazy.
We were talking about Europe and refugees, it should be blatantly obvious.
Have you ever considered that what you write maybe makes sense to you, but not others? It is a common thing to happen. When someone asks for clarification, the obvious thing is to clarify. Claiming that either one option of me playing dumb or another option me being out of touch with world politics being the only two options is an obvious mental fallacy as other options exist.
This was the discussion
I mean sure Bernie is a democratic socialist, but many countries are successful with democratic socialist politicians running things. Bernie would probably fit somewhere in the middle in some European countries.
Those countries are having a lot of issues due to their leftist policies. Like millions of single men coming as refugees that can’t find jobs or women and the resulting problems.
If it’s not clear to you then you have issues with reading comprehension.
Sorry it wasn’t clear (I was likely thread hopping), but at least I can form logical arguments which you have once again demonstrated that you can’t with this…
If it’s not clear to you then you have issues with reading comprehension.
Do you see the issues with this type of stupid shit? I can explain if you want.
Can you even bring yourself to admit hypocrisy isn’t a monopoly of either side ?
Isn’t that what I’ve been doing? I’ve merely pointed out the hypocrisy of the right because you dudes are pointing it out on the left consistently. Seems to me that without the points I’ve made showing it’s both sides we’d all just be agreeing “lefties are scum dickheads.”
You jump through hoops and contort yourself defending the left but cant seem to call them out on their openly anti American, racist, pro communism
You’re struggling with reading it seems. Pointing out the issues of a side doesn’t equal supporting those things on the other. I guess I missed the posts where I said those things were ok or good. Would it help if I said I’m not anti American, racist, or pro communism? I didn’t think I needed to point those things out repeatedly as I’ve never said anything like that at all.
Many people who lean left don’t support those things in the least bit just as many who lean right don’t support many of the things the current republicans stand for.
Resorts to petty ineffective insults. Tsk tsk.
Reply to the post or don’t. Don’t claim to be offended when you’re throwing disdain for people out consistently. Am I not supposed to think you’re struggling with that when you consistently struggle with putting words in my mouth? This is what you tend to do when you don’t like what someone says. You say enraged or insults or something because you don’t seem to have much else to the actual point of the post.
Also unsure you really want to say resorts to insults when my post was a response to your insults.
Sorry bro… I see far more vitriol, invective and out right violence directed at Trump supporters than at Obama’s…
I guess we all chose to see what we choose to see.
There is no shortage of alternative facts and realities.
Sorry bro… I see far more vitriol, invective and out right violence directed at Trump supporters than at Obama’s.
“But a nationwide review conducted by ABC News has identified at least 36 criminal cases where Trump was invoked in direct connection with violent acts, threats of violence or allegations of assault.
In nine cases, perpetrators hailed Trump in the midst or immediate aftermath of physically attacking innocent victims. In another 10 cases, perpetrators cheered or defended Trump while taunting or threatening others. And in another 10 cases, Trump and his rhetoric were cited in court to explain a defendant’s violent or threatening behavior.
Seven cases involved violent or threatening acts perpetrated in defiance of Trump, with many of them targeting Trump’s allies in Congress. But the vast majority of the cases – 29 of the 36 – reflect someone echoing presidential rhetoric, not protesting it.
ABC News could not find a single criminal case filed in federal or state court where an act of violence or threat was made in the name of President Barack Obama or President George W. Bush.”
Google has more examples if you would like.
I suppose I need to point out I don’t support violence by the left nor hatefulness towards people based on their political leanings. I probably shouldn’t have to put that but it seems to be needed. In b4 “yeah liberal mainstream media lies.” I am assuming you’re also aware of multiple threats and calls for violence by the President himself.
Sorry… A ton of these are dubious, extremely “liberal” in their labelling and a lot were outright lies and hoaxes.
You still believe Jussie ?
For the record and before you try to smear me… Any unwarranted violence is weak and cowardly.
Sorry… A ton of these are dubious, extremely “liberal” in their labelling and a lot were outright lies and hoaxes.
Perhaps. I don’t believe you’ll find evidence that supports your point of more violence from the left but we’ve done this before on here. Feelings aren’t facts was my point. You said you feel like more violence is by one side. I’m merely pointing out facts tend to not back that up.
For the record and before you try to smear me… Any unwarranted violence is weak and cowardly.
I’m not trying to smear you in the least bit. And I didn’t need you to say the last part I assumed it.
Sure. I’m just not sure I’d point out a few examples to dismiss the entire batch. Merely because that guys an idiot doesn’t make your statement accurate. Just like I wouldn’t dismiss the Presidents calls for violence himself as just a bunch of jokes.
Violence against people based on political leanings is idiotic on both sides. But the evidence suggests the problem is worse on the right and this has been proven on this forum more than once. I don’t feel like doing that whole debate again because it’s easy for anyone to say “well he’s not actually a right wing guy” or something similar.
Surely you understand my scepticism
And you surely must see how you are missing a huge part of the total equation.
If there is an increase in “bogus” hate crimes (which have dubious statistics)…the increase in actual hate crimes has increased exponentially (by statistics that have been kept for decades).
And these aren’t just people being punched out for wearing “MAGA” gear.
What about that cop who claimed his coffee from McDonald’s had fucking pig written on it? Turns out he wrote it.
Then you have Ashley Todd.
Besides, whites invented fake hate crimes to justify lynching black men.
Besides, whites invented fake hate crimes to justify lynching black men…
Ouch.
This.
That dude’s a dummy. Not sure how that negates the numerous fake hate crimes perpetrated by non whites though.

