[quote]KSman wrote:
When doctors publish, they have to say “may” when the percieved risk might be non-zero. With inconclusive data…
OP: TSH=2.48 is after Iodoral? How many total mg’s?
If you are monitoring body temps as suggested, you are in control of this.
If one has been deficient for long enough to have thyroid producing nodules, you are already hyper and production was rate limited by low iodine levels. Does iodine replenishment [IR] cause this problem? -no. But it unmasks it. But hopefully a doc’s routine palpation of the thyroid would catch this. But with doc’s ignoring problem levels of TSH and not thinking about the role of iodine, they are responsible for many cases of iodine deficiency progressing to hyperthyroidism.
Many years ago when introducing iodized salt to deeply deficient populations, some problems were found vs stats those who were not receiving iodized salt. But the problems were also associated with IR in populations with goitres.
You should be cautious about overly broad conclusions. So how do you decide? If your body temperatures are low, is that a good way to live? An how fast to do IR? Many advocate 50mg/day if tolerate. Can you take less? Yes. Some may feel poorly is IR is displacing stored bromines. But there is only way to clear these. Clearing slower may be beneficial in some cases.[/quote]
The man himself, thanks for the response.
I just started taking iodoral. The TSH is before iodoral. A little bit strange that in 2011 I had a TSH of 1.6 and in 2012 a 2.4. In between (the two tests), I did a tren ace/test prop cycle and I also ran an epistane PH cycle. The epistane cycle ended this Nov, I then did nolva and had a month between cessation of nolva and the most recent blood test (i.e. the one with a TSH of 2.4). I also had some other things checked, and my test was through the roof:
Tests:
Testosterone Total: 1202 (250-1100)
Testosterone Free: 294 (35-155)
Corisol, Free: .84
T4, Free: 1.0 (.8-1.8)
LH: 8.4 (1.5-9.3)
FSH: 6.5 (1.6-8.0)
TSH: 2.48 (0.4-4.5)
T3 Total: 91 (76-181)
SHBG: 22 (10-50)
Had a CBC along with a Comp Metabolic Panel as well if interested
My Lipid panel was pretty bad but I’m attributing this to the use of epistane (oral PH) and I suspect it probably has a similar effect to winstrol in terms of destroying lipids. I hope it will stabilize in the near future:
Cholesterol: 309 (125-200)
Triglycerides 56 (<150)
HDL: 52 (> or = 40Mg/dl)
LDL: 246 (<130)
Cholesterol:HDL Ratio: 5.9 (0-5.0)
Non-HDL Cholesterol: 257
Just want to mention once again the above results are my most recent test and it’s all prior to beginning iodoral (which I just began).
I’m taking 3 12.5mg tablets, will probably bump up to 4 if no problems. The thing is, I would rather have an optimally performing thyroid, of course. I just don’t want to take something that isn’t “optimal” and change it to “really bad” inadvertently.