[quote]Headhunter wrote:
FormerlyTexasGuy wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
after many years of teaching, it gets to where you can look at what someone wrote, without actually reading it, and just know if they get it or are clueless.
FTG: fail, F-. Doesn’t know what the topic is and is/asking questions NOT relevant to the topic at hand.
Cow Person: maybe a D-. He is blameless in his ignorance, as he grew up probably in public schools.
Prof X: as a highly educated black male (his words), he should know better. F—.
Apparently you are a shitty teacher then.
The topic is discussing the morality of allocating federal taxes to a local area after it experienced a natural disaster.
Nope. Wrong again, Sam. The topic is the morality of setting up a system that one group can use to plunder another group.
To say, “Well, we pay more!” or some of the other inanities you type is beside the point. I said (over and over) that it doesn’t matter if its a dollar or my life’s savings, you have no right to plunder anyone of anything.
You guys have voted for decades to create this system. Instead of relying on private charity, you use tax money to rebuild. That is morally wrong. Taxes themselves are morally wrong. Just because you get plundered doesn’t justify you plundering.
You say you agree with my philosophy until it comes to rebuilding your roads and sewers. Well, wtf?
[/quote]
I’m afraid you are wrong about the topic. The topic is discussing the morality of allocating federal taxes to a local area after it experienced a natural disaster. You consider that plunder. Call it what you will, we are talking about the same issue. Thanks again for confirming my point.
The reality is nobody is plundering you. The fact is Texans pay taxes that are in turn used for public upkeep. That is what we are getting. No plunder. Your argument is bunk, off base and inaccurate. Keep talking in cirlces all you want, your “philosophy” in this context is factually wrong.