[quote]AynRandLuvr wrote:
FormerlyTexasGuy wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
Kruiser wrote:
It amazes me that in over two hundred years some “citizens” still don’t grasp the concept of the United States of America. Can you imagine the chaos that would ensue if everybody got to personally choose exactly where their tax dollars were to be spent.
…seeing how well it all works now. Yeah! How horrible if you got to decide that none of your tax money can be used for the war! Terrible if your yax dollars can’t be given to Bear Sterns!
Freedom WOULD be a bad thing to you proto-little totalitarians, wouldn’t it?
Again you have a point regarding Bear Stearns, questionable wars, social security etc and I agree with you personally but natural disasters affecting tax paying citizens are another story all together.
Surely they would direct their own taxes to rebuild their own public infrastructure. You have now come full circle and argued with your own argument.
No, he hasn’t. Unless you ask Obama, there are 50 independent states. We’ve forgotten that the original intent was that these United States are independent entities and that the purpose of the Federal government was to present a common face to EXTERNAL foes. This is not Germany.
[/quote]
Yes, he has. I still don’t think you really grasp the argument outside of an elementary level. You are comparing apples to oranges.
Originally, states were more autonomous, but the Federal gov’t has always collected taxes to re-distribute where necessary. Federal Government does govern the federation after all.
You are now comparing apples and oranges however. Original constitutional intent would make a great thread in the political forum.
Honestly, I’d probably agree with you on states rights and individuality but this situation is not the same at all. Especially when you quantify the amount of taxes each affected tax paying citizen has paid in to the pot that is now re-building their roads, schools etc. Your argument here is baseless.