I Can't Keep Up!

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
141

Oh come one. He didn’t get charged with perjury because he was a sitting president. Us regular folk would have been charged. He lied under oath when he claimed he was never alone with Monica Lewinskly. “My secretary was outside, in another room!” He lied under oath when he said he didn’t have intimate sexual relations with her.

Come the hell on, he screwed her with a cigar and had her spitting baby batter up all over her blue dress. His saving grace was the fact the Wright didn’t want to bring perjury against a sitting President who was trying to define what “is,” is. So instead, she settled for contempt and was done with it. Contempt against a sitting president was historical enough.

Now Libby will be using the “I was so busy I forgot,” defense. He’ll introduce all these things he was working on at the time. He’ll flood the court with intelligence information and documents to prove his state of mind. Libby will get away with it. Just as Clinton did.

But us regular Joes? Rofl.

142

[quote]100meters wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:

Coming from someone that denies Clinton perjured himself and believe that his disbarrment was voluntary I take this as a compliment.

Technically he didn’t.
I didn’t say voluntary either. That was how he settled the case. Again fact. If you have anything to debunk–feel free…but evidence would be nice…

for example I posted link to the settlement…

[/quote]

He settled because he was guilty.

143

Every time I see the title of this thread I think it says:

I Can’t Keep IT Up!

Poor vroom.

144

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
while ignoring the very likely possibility that the Democratic leadership was well aware of the problems and chose to release them as an October surprise is hypocrisy.

[/quote]

This is still just made up. Not one republican has come foward with any evidence that this is true. Not one. Every allegation has been made by Republican pages and republican staffers, and republican congressmen.

And again please note: CREW immediately turned over the information to the FBI and NEVER said another word about it until after this was already out, and that to say the FBI never bothered to check into it.

Just because Hedo lied about this doesn’t mean you get to repeat the same lie. NOTE: still no links to evidence.

145

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
100meters wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:

Coming from someone that denies Clinton perjured himself and believe that his disbarrment was voluntary I take this as a compliment.

Technically he didn’t.
I didn’t say voluntary either. That was how he settled the case. Again fact. If you have anything to debunk–feel free…but evidence would be nice…

for example I posted link to the settlement…

He settled because he was guilty.[/quote]

Zap, this is real easy…what did he admit to in the settlement…I mean this isn’t hard to look into and I already provided the link to one article on it…

The whole point of the settlement is because they COULD NOT get him on perjury, hence the admission to false tesitimony. For the love of pete…

146

[quote]100meters wrote:

This is still just made up. Not one republican has come foward with any evidence that this is true. Not one.
[/quote]

Republicans have enough political savvy not to blow their loads 28 days before the election.

147

[quote]doogie wrote:
100meters wrote:

This is still just made up. Not one republican has come foward with any evidence that this is true. Not one.

Republicans have enough political savvy not to blow their loads 28 days before the election.[/quote]

This doesn’t sound too savvy to me:

MCHENRY: The question remains, though: What person, group or political entity had these nasty instant messages and possessed the e-mails in order to solicit this story? And in a partisan environment like we?re in right now in Washington, four weeks out from a national election, that question must be asked.

BLITZER: So what you?re suggesting ? and correct me if I?m wrong, because you?ve been doing this for the last few days ? that Democrats are behind the timing of the release of this information? Is that your accusation?

MCHENRY: Well, look, all the fact points lead to one question: Did Rahm Emanuel or Nancy Pelosi have any involvement on the strategic or tactical level? This morning on ?This Week with George Stephanopoulos,? the question was asked of Rahm Emanuel. His reaction was he did not see the instant messages or e-mails. He repeatedly said, he did not see. I?ve asked him to testify under oath to assure the American people that he was not involved in this issue in any way, shape or form.

BLITZER: Do you have any evidence at all that Democrats or others might have been behind the timing of this scandal?

MCHENRY: Look, let?s be honest?

BLITZER: Do you have any evidence to back that charge up?

MCHENRY: No, no, actually, if the Democrats had any issue with saying this, putting all the facts out on the table, they would say, certainly, I?ll testify under oath that I had no involvement in it. They?ve said no.

BLITZER: Well, you don?t have any evidence, though, right?

MCHENRY: Well, look at the fact points.

BLITZER: Yes or no, do you have any evidence, Congressman?

MCHENRY: Do you have any evidence that they weren?t involved?

BLITZER: I?m just asking if you?re just throwing out an accusation or if you have any hard evidence.

MCHENRY: No. It?s a question, Wolf. The question remains, were they involved? And if they were not involved, they need to say clearly. And it?s a question. It?s not an accusation.

Readers:
Substitue Hedo for the hapless republican McHenry for a good chuckle…taken to school by Blitzer of all people!

Oh so savvy!

148

[quote]100meters wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
while ignoring the very likely possibility that the Democratic leadership was well aware of the problems and chose to release them as an October surprise is hypocrisy.

This is still just made up. Not one republican has come foward with any evidence that this is true. Not one. Every allegation has been made by Republican pages and republican staffers, and republican congressmen.

And again please note: CREW immediately turned over the information to the FBI and NEVER said another word about it until after this was already out, and that to say the FBI never bothered to check into it.

Just because Hedo lied about this doesn’t mean you get to repeat the same lie. NOTE: still no links to evidence.

[/quote]

Fuck you douchebag. The articles been posted and copied already. If your too stupid to read it then don’t. But for christsakes stop saying it hasn’t been reported… Michael Barone US NEWS and WORLD REPORT. Oct. 06. even a simplistic fool like you should be able to read. Disagree with it, argue it’s validity, I don’t care but stop whining like a stood up bitch and sack up. Crew is made up of even more hardcore wingbats then you.

Open your eyes or make a valid point. Alternatively, since you’ve made a laughingstock of yourself you could just sulk away, like you do after election day.

How many times do you have to be told nobody falls for your shit anymore. It’s boring and redundant to repeat your mantra when you are the only one listening too it.

149

[quote]100meters wrote:
doogie wrote:
100meters wrote:

This is still just made up. Not one republican has come foward with any evidence that this is true. Not one.

Republicans have enough political savvy not to blow their loads 28 days before the election.

This doesn’t sound too savvy to me:

MCHENRY: The question remains, though: What person, group or political entity had these nasty instant messages and possessed the e-mails in order to solicit this story? And in a partisan environment like we?re in right now in Washington, four weeks out from a national election, that question must be asked.

BLITZER: So what you?re suggesting ? and correct me if I?m wrong, because you?ve been doing this for the last few days ? that Democrats are behind the timing of the release of this information? Is that your accusation?

MCHENRY: Well, look, all the fact points lead to one question: Did Rahm Emanuel or Nancy Pelosi have any involvement on the strategic or tactical level? This morning on ?This Week with George Stephanopoulos,? the question was asked of Rahm Emanuel. His reaction was he did not see the instant messages or e-mails. He repeatedly said, he did not see. I?ve asked him to testify under oath to assure the American people that he was not involved in this issue in any way, shape or form.

BLITZER: Do you have any evidence at all that Democrats or others might have been behind the timing of this scandal?

MCHENRY: Look, let?s be honest?

BLITZER: Do you have any evidence to back that charge up?

MCHENRY: No, no, actually, if the Democrats had any issue with saying this, putting all the facts out on the table, they would say, certainly, I?ll testify under oath that I had no involvement in it. They?ve said no.

BLITZER: Well, you don?t have any evidence, though, right?

MCHENRY: Well, look at the fact points.

BLITZER: Yes or no, do you have any evidence, Congressman?

MCHENRY: Do you have any evidence that they weren?t involved?

BLITZER: I?m just asking if you?re just throwing out an accusation or if you have any hard evidence.

MCHENRY: No. It?s a question, Wolf. The question remains, were they involved? And if they were not involved, they need to say clearly. And it?s a question. It?s not an accusation.

Readers:
Substitue Hedo for the hapless republican McHenry for a good chuckle…taken to school by Blitzer of all people!

Oh so savvy![/quote]

You do realize your posts are becoming more and more irrelevant. Are you queer for me 100, you certainly seem to have an undue fascination with me? Is it because I have made a fool of you over and over. Even the moonbats have distanced themselves from you. Perhaps youcouldmake it a little more challenging and actually put up an argument that makes sense instead of a shrill hissy fit? Try it.

Your a Democratic hack 100. That’s like being a Cubs fan. Always a lot of promise but always a lot of dissapointment.

But since I am such a better man then you and I am finding your pathetic and boring. I’m going to ignore you unless you can make a point. Do you think you can make a point precious…come on do you have a point or just mindless drivel from Daily Kos?

150

Frankly, who cares if the Democrats leaked it?

It is the oppositions job to have their eyes on the governing party and if they time it right for the elections, well, when was this ever a game played by gentlemen?

Thank God both parties dig up dirt on another for politcal reasons, otherwise you`d never hear about it…

Plus, it is kind of strange to question the motives of your accuser if you were caught with your hands in the cookie jar, everybody and I mean everybody that reports a crime/scandal does so for selfish reasons, so that can hardly be a problem.

151

[quote]orion wrote:
Frankly, who cares if the Democrats leaked it?

Thank God both parties dig up dirt on another for politcal reasons, otherwise you`d never hear about it…

[/quote]

If the dems knew about it but held the information until October for political reasons, that equates to playing politics with the lives of these kids who were being preyed on by Foley. That is almost as fucked as Foley is.

152

[quote]doogie wrote:
orion wrote:
Frankly, who cares if the Democrats leaked it?

Thank God both parties dig up dirt on another for politcal reasons, otherwise you`d never hear about it…

If the dems knew about it but held the information until October for political reasons, that equates to playing politics with the lives of these kids who were being preyed on by Foley. That is almost as fucked as Foley is.[/quote]

Sigh…

If there were any kids involved, I`d probably agree with you…

153

[quote]orion wrote:
Frankly, who cares if the Democrats leaked it?

It is the oppositions job to have their eyes on the governing party and if they time it right for the elections, well, when was this ever a game played by gentlemen?

Thank God both parties dig up dirt on another for politcal reasons, otherwise you`d never hear about it…

Plus, it is kind of strange to question the motives of your accuser if you were caught with your hands in the cookie jar, everybody and I mean everybody that reports a crime/scandal does so for selfish reasons, so that can hardly be a problem.[/quote]

Actually Orion the reason the Democrats are whining so loudly is becasue they are trying to claim the Republicans knew but did nothing when in fact the Democrats knew also. If they call for resignations over it then they need to include their own party leadership who placed politics above the protection of the pages, but still try and claim a moral high ground.

It’s pure politics on both sides at this point. Very common before elections. Just wait a few weeks, it will get better.

154

[quote]doogie wrote:
orion wrote:
Frankly, who cares if the Democrats leaked it?

Thank God both parties dig up dirt on another for politcal reasons, otherwise you`d never hear about it…

If the dems knew about it but held the information until October for political reasons, that equates to playing politics with the lives of these kids who were being preyed on by Foley. That is almost as fucked as Foley is.[/quote]

yep, it’s the crux of the issue. If you are calling for accountability you need to accept accountability. Anyone want to bet Pelosi will call for her own resignation if it is found out she knew back in May?

155

[quote]hedo wrote:
100meters wrote:
Zap Branigan wrote:
while ignoring the very likely possibility that the Democratic leadership was well aware of the problems and chose to release them as an October surprise is hypocrisy.

This is still just made up. Not one republican has come foward with any evidence that this is true. Not one. Every allegation has been made by Republican pages and republican staffers, and republican congressmen.

And again please note: CREW immediately turned over the information to the FBI and NEVER said another word about it until after this was already out, and that to say the FBI never bothered to check into it.

Just because Hedo lied about this doesn’t mean you get to repeat the same lie. NOTE: still no links to evidence.

Fuck you douchebag. The articles been posted and copied already. If your too stupid to read it then don’t. But for christsakes stop saying it hasn’t been reported… Michael Barone US NEWS and WORLD REPORT. Oct. 06. even a simplistic fool like you should be able to read. Disagree with it, argue it’s validity, I don’t care but stop whining like a stood up bitch and sack up. Crew is made up of even more hardcore wingbats then you.

Open your eyes or make a valid point. Alternatively, since you’ve made a laughingstock of yourself you could just sulk away, like you do after election day.

How many times do you have to be told nobody falls for your shit anymore. It’s boring and redundant to repeat your mantra when you are the only one listening too it.

[/quote]

Again, you’re still debunked, as the articles you posted do not cite any evidence of your claims. As Vroom keeps nicely telling you…

Post evididence that democrats knew and released this or just shut up and say you’re sorry, like you didn’t when you LIED about the “recent polls”. You LIED.
I didn’t.

Now go google and stop menitioning articles that have nothing to do with democrats or the democratic party.

and again CREW gave the emails to the FBI immediately(who did nothing)…so enough about CREW for the billionth time…

156

[quote]hedo wrote:
100meters wrote:
doogie wrote:
100meters wrote:

This is still just made up. Not one republican has come foward with any evidence that this is true. Not one.

Republicans have enough political savvy not to blow their loads 28 days before the election.

This doesn’t sound too savvy to me:

MCHENRY: The question remains, though: What person, group or political entity had these nasty instant messages and possessed the e-mails in order to solicit this story? And in a partisan environment like we?re in right now in Washington, four weeks out from a national election, that question must be asked.

BLITZER: So what you?re suggesting ? and correct me if I?m wrong, because you?ve been doing this for the last few days ? that Democrats are behind the timing of the release of this information? Is that your accusation?

MCHENRY: Well, look, all the fact points lead to one question: Did Rahm Emanuel or Nancy Pelosi have any involvement on the strategic or tactical level? This morning on ?This Week with George Stephanopoulos,? the question was asked of Rahm Emanuel. His reaction was he did not see the instant messages or e-mails. He repeatedly said, he did not see. I?ve asked him to testify under oath to assure the American people that he was not involved in this issue in any way, shape or form.

BLITZER: Do you have any evidence at all that Democrats or others might have been behind the timing of this scandal?

MCHENRY: Look, let?s be honest?

BLITZER: Do you have any evidence to back that charge up?

MCHENRY: No, no, actually, if the Democrats had any issue with saying this, putting all the facts out on the table, they would say, certainly, I?ll testify under oath that I had no involvement in it. They?ve said no.

BLITZER: Well, you don?t have any evidence, though, right?

MCHENRY: Well, look at the fact points.

BLITZER: Yes or no, do you have any evidence, Congressman?

MCHENRY: Do you have any evidence that they weren?t involved?

BLITZER: I?m just asking if you?re just throwing out an accusation or if you have any hard evidence.

MCHENRY: No. It?s a question, Wolf. The question remains, were they involved? And if they were not involved, they need to say clearly. And it?s a question. It?s not an accusation.

Readers:
Substitue Hedo for the hapless republican McHenry for a good chuckle…taken to school by Blitzer of all people!

Oh so savvy!

You do realize your posts are becoming more and more irrelevant. Are you queer for me 100, you certainly seem to have an undue fascination with me? Is it because I have made a fool of you over and over. Even the moonbats have distanced themselves from you. Perhaps youcouldmake it a little more challenging and actually put up an argument that makes sense instead of a shrill hissy fit? Try it.

Your a Democratic hack 100. That’s like being a Cubs fan. Always a lot of promise but always a lot of dissapointment.

But since I am such a better man then you and I am finding your pathetic and boring. I’m going to ignore you unless you can make a point. Do you think you can make a point precious…come on do you have a point or just mindless drivel from Daily Kos?

[/quote]

My point: YOU MAKE S–T UP.
Proof: you can’t provide any evidence, like the congressman above. NONE.
Second: You have a history of lying.
Proof: “RECENT POLLS”----remember?

157

[quote]doogie wrote:
orion wrote:
Frankly, who cares if the Democrats leaked it?

Thank God both parties dig up dirt on another for politcal reasons, otherwise you`d never hear about it…

If the dems knew about it but held the information until October for political reasons, that equates to playing politics with the lives of these kids who were being preyed on by Foley. That is almost as fucked as Foley is.[/quote]

Well, thank god there is absolutely no evidence of this, but yes its horrible that Repubs knew this and STILL pushed Foley to run even when he considered resigning last term…speaking of playing politics, it really doesn’t get worse than that.

158

[quote]hedo wrote:
orion wrote:
Frankly, who cares if the Democrats leaked it?

It is the oppositions job to have their eyes on the governing party and if they time it right for the elections, well, when was this ever a game played by gentlemen?

Thank God both parties dig up dirt on another for politcal reasons, otherwise you`d never hear about it…

Plus, it is kind of strange to question the motives of your accuser if you were caught with your hands in the cookie jar, everybody and I mean everybody that reports a crime/scandal does so for selfish reasons, so that can hardly be a problem.

Actually Orion the reason the Democrats are whining so loudly is becasue they are trying to claim the Republicans knew but did nothing when in fact the Democrats knew also. If they call for resignations over it then they need to include their own party leadership who placed politics above the protection of the pages, but still try and claim a moral high ground.

It’s pure politics on both sides at this point. Very common before elections. Just wait a few weeks, it will get better.

[/quote]

Sigh…again, there is no evidence of this…Can someone intelligent please explain to poor hedo what evidence is?

159

[quote]100meters wrote:
doogie wrote:
100meters wrote:

This is still just made up. Not one republican has come foward with any evidence that this is true. Not one.

Republicans have enough political savvy not to blow their loads 28 days before the election.

This doesn’t sound too savvy to me:

MCHENRY: The question remains, though: What person, group or political entity had these nasty instant messages and possessed the e-mails in order to solicit this story? And in a partisan environment like we?re in right now in Washington, four weeks out from a national election, that question must be asked.

BLITZER: So what you?re suggesting ? and correct me if I?m wrong, because you?ve been doing this for the last few days ? that Democrats are behind the timing of the release of this information? Is that your accusation?

MCHENRY: Well, look, all the fact points lead to one question: Did Rahm Emanuel or Nancy Pelosi have any involvement on the strategic or tactical level? This morning on ?This Week with George Stephanopoulos,? the question was asked of Rahm Emanuel. His reaction was he did not see the instant messages or e-mails. He repeatedly said, he did not see. I?ve asked him to testify under oath to assure the American people that he was not involved in this issue in any way, shape or form.

BLITZER: Do you have any evidence at all that Democrats or others might have been behind the timing of this scandal?

MCHENRY: Look, let?s be honest?

BLITZER: Do you have any evidence to back that charge up?

MCHENRY: No, no, actually, if the Democrats had any issue with saying this, putting all the facts out on the table, they would say, certainly, I?ll testify under oath that I had no involvement in it. They?ve said no.

BLITZER: Well, you don?t have any evidence, though, right?

MCHENRY: Well, look at the fact points.

BLITZER: Yes or no, do you have any evidence, Congressman?

MCHENRY: Do you have any evidence that they weren?t involved?

BLITZER: I?m just asking if you?re just throwing out an accusation or if you have any hard evidence.

MCHENRY: No. It?s a question, Wolf. The question remains, were they involved? And if they were not involved, they need to say clearly. And it?s a question. It?s not an accusation.

Readers:
Substitue Hedo for the hapless republican McHenry for a good chuckle…taken to school by Blitzer of all people!

Oh so savvy![/quote]

Thanks for posting that. Instead of Blitzer trying to investigate the very real possibility of the Dems having prior knowledge he acts as if he is a paid shill for the Democratic party.

The funny thing is you think that he is unbiased!

160

[quote]100meters wrote:
hedo wrote:
100meters wrote:
doogie wrote:
100meters wrote:

This is still just made up. Not one republican has come foward with any evidence that this is true. Not one.

Republicans have enough political savvy not to blow their loads 28 days before the election.

This doesn’t sound too savvy to me:

MCHENRY: The question remains, though: What person, group or political entity had these nasty instant messages and possessed the e-mails in order to solicit this story? And in a partisan environment like we?re in right now in Washington, four weeks out from a national election, that question must be asked.

BLITZER: So what you?re suggesting ? and correct me if I?m wrong, because you?ve been doing this for the last few days ? that Democrats are behind the timing of the release of this information? Is that your accusation?

MCHENRY: Well, look, all the fact points lead to one question: Did Rahm Emanuel or Nancy Pelosi have any involvement on the strategic or tactical level? This morning on ?This Week with George Stephanopoulos,? the question was asked of Rahm Emanuel. His reaction was he did not see the instant messages or e-mails. He repeatedly said, he did not see. I?ve asked him to testify under oath to assure the American people that he was not involved in this issue in any way, shape or form.

BLITZER: Do you have any evidence at all that Democrats or others might have been behind the timing of this scandal?

MCHENRY: Look, let?s be honest?

BLITZER: Do you have any evidence to back that charge up?

MCHENRY: No, no, actually, if the Democrats had any issue with saying this, putting all the facts out on the table, they would say, certainly, I?ll testify under oath that I had no involvement in it. They?ve said no.

BLITZER: Well, you don?t have any evidence, though, right?

MCHENRY: Well, look at the fact points.

BLITZER: Yes or no, do you have any evidence, Congressman?

MCHENRY: Do you have any evidence that they weren?t involved?

BLITZER: I?m just asking if you?re just throwing out an accusation or if you have any hard evidence.

MCHENRY: No. It?s a question, Wolf. The question remains, were they involved? And if they were not involved, they need to say clearly. And it?s a question. It?s not an accusation.

Readers:
Substitue Hedo for the hapless republican McHenry for a good chuckle…taken to school by Blitzer of all people!

Oh so savvy!

You do realize your posts are becoming more and more irrelevant. Are you queer for me 100, you certainly seem to have an undue fascination with me? Is it because I have made a fool of you over and over. Even the moonbats have distanced themselves from you. Perhaps youcouldmake it a little more challenging and actually put up an argument that makes sense instead of a shrill hissy fit? Try it.

Your a Democratic hack 100. That’s like being a Cubs fan. Always a lot of promise but always a lot of dissapointment.

But since I am such a better man then you and I am finding your pathetic and boring. I’m going to ignore you unless you can make a point. Do you think you can make a point precious…come on do you have a point or just mindless drivel from Daily Kos?

My point: YOU MAKE S–T UP.
Proof: you can’t provide any evidence, like the congressman above. NONE.
Second: You have a history of lying.
Proof: “RECENT POLLS”----remember?[/quote]

Let me use your level of reasoning. I know I’ll have to dumb down but I’ll do it for your benefit.

“no no no, wrong. Already proven, everyone agrees. Democrats are right, I’m not a liar you are”

There that should be something you can understand. It’s your level of silliness son. Sound familiar.

bye