[quote]MaximusB wrote:
That synthol fool does not even look remotely normal.[/quote]
Yeah, but I have learned the average person ahs seen so few really built people, it all looks the same to them.
I mean that.
Show that picture to the average person standing in line at the grocery store in flip flops and they will just think he spent too much time on his biceps in the gym.
[quote]rds63799 wrote:
I think that synthol guy looks good[/quote]
Serious?
I mean, really, if you are, could you explain that?
I tend to think most women wouldn’t even know the difference and would think that was muscle.[/quote]
na mate, not serious at all. He looks like he’s covered in gross tumours!
as an experiment, I showed it to a friend of mine. She asked what was wrong with his arms so I think the average woman is more savvy to synthol use than that.
[quote]rds63799 wrote:
I think that synthol guy looks good[/quote]
Serious?
I mean, really, if you are, could you explain that?
I tend to think most women wouldn’t even know the difference and would think that was muscle.[/quote]
na mate, not serious at all. He looks like he’s covered in gross tumours!
as an experiment, I showed it to a friend of mine. She asked what was wrong with his arms so I think the average woman is more savvy to synthol use than that.[/quote]
I think it depends on how he is holding himself.
I am betting if they just saw him standing there, many more would be fooled. That whole videos clues you in on something being off.
[quote]rds63799 wrote:
I think that synthol guy looks good[/quote]
Serious?
I mean, really, if you are, could you explain that?
I tend to think most women wouldn’t even know the difference and would think that was muscle.[/quote]
na mate, not serious at all. He looks like he’s covered in gross tumours!
as an experiment, I showed it to a friend of mine. She asked what was wrong with his arms so I think the average woman is more savvy to synthol use than that.[/quote]
No, she just has a very rigid matrix of what looks “righz”, anything else is “off”.
[quote]rds63799 wrote:
I think that synthol guy looks good[/quote]
Serious?
I mean, really, if you are, could you explain that?
I tend to think most women wouldn’t even know the difference and would think that was muscle.[/quote]
na mate, not serious at all. He looks like he’s covered in gross tumours!
as an experiment, I showed it to a friend of mine. She asked what was wrong with his arms so I think the average woman is more savvy to synthol use than that.[/quote]
No, she just has a very rigid matrix of what looks “righz”, anything else is “off”. [/quote]
I am betting many women would say the same of Phil heath’s arms.
[quote]rds63799 wrote:
I think that synthol guy looks good[/quote]
Serious?
I mean, really, if you are, could you explain that?
I tend to think most women wouldn’t even know the difference and would think that was muscle.[/quote]
na mate, not serious at all. He looks like he’s covered in gross tumours!
as an experiment, I showed it to a friend of mine. She asked what was wrong with his arms so I think the average woman is more savvy to synthol use than that.[/quote]
No, she just has a very rigid matrix of what looks “righz”, anything else is “off”. [/quote]
I am betting many women would say the same of Phil heath’s arms.[/quote]
I dont know, I know that women say they dont want such a thing but gush all over it when it is right in front of them?
[quote]rds63799 wrote:
I think that synthol guy looks good[/quote]
Serious?
I mean, really, if you are, could you explain that?
I tend to think most women wouldn’t even know the difference and would think that was muscle.[/quote]
na mate, not serious at all. He looks like he’s covered in gross tumours!
as an experiment, I showed it to a friend of mine. She asked what was wrong with his arms so I think the average woman is more savvy to synthol use than that.[/quote]
No, she just has a very rigid matrix of what looks “righz”, anything else is “off”. [/quote]