How Long is Your Finger?

The length of your ring finger determines your financial success?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090113/ap_on_sc/sci_financial_finger

Finger length may predict financial success

By RANDOLPH E. SCHMID, AP Science Writer Randolph E. Schmid, Ap Science Writer ? 1 hr 52 mins ago

WASHINGTON ? The length of a man’s ring finger may predict his success as a financial trader. Researchers at the University of Cambridge in England report that men with longer ring fingers, compared to their index fingers, tended to be more successful in the frantic high-frequency trading in the London financial district.

Indeed, the impact of biology on success was about equal to years of experience at the job, the team led by physiologist John M. Coates reports in Monday’s edition of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The same ring-to-index finger ratio has previously been associated with success in competitive sports such as soccer and basketball, the researchers noted.

The length ratio between those two fingers is determined during the development of the fetus and the relatively longer ring finger indicates greater exposure to the male hormone androgen, the researchers noted.

Previous studies have found that such exposure can lead to increased confidence, risk preferences, search persistence, heightened vigilance and quickened reaction times.

In a separate study last year, Coates and colleagues reported that the hormone that drives male aggression and sexual interest also seemed able to boost short term success at finance.

They studied male financial traders in London, taking saliva samples in the morning and evening. They found that those with higher levels of testosterone in the morning were more likely to make an unusually big profit that day. Testosterone, best known as the male sex hormone, affects aggression, confidence and risk-taking.

In the new study, the researchers measured the right hands of 44 male stock traders who were engaged in a type of trade that involved rapid decision-making and quick physical reactions.

Over 20 months those with longer ring fingers compared to their index fingers made 11 times more money than those with the shortest ring fingers. Over the same time the most experienced traders made about 9 times more than the least experienced ones.

Looking only at experienced traders, the long-ring-finger folks earned 5 times more than those with short ring fingers.

While the finger ratio, showing fetal exposure to male hormones, appears to signal likely success in high-actively trading that calls for risk-taking and quick reactions, it may not indicate people who would do well at other sorts of financial activities, the researchers said.

Some traders require additional skills on dealing with clients and sales workers.

And the advantage may even reverse for some, Coates team said, such as traders taking a more analytical and long-term approach to the markets.

One study, which looked at average finger ratios in university departments found that faculty from math, science and engineering exhibited longer index finger ratio, rather than ring finger, they noted.


Roids.

Long enough to do the job…

whoops. thought this was the sex forum.

[quote]Makavali wrote:
Roids.[/quote]

pic

finger lengths can also help determine your testosterone levels as well as the size of your weiner!

interesting stuff! hahaha

like a foot or 2

This has come up a few times over the years. I’ve never really figured how you’re supposed to measure your fingers. At a glance, if my fingers are closed together, they look almost the same, but if I spread my fingers the middle finger is clearly longer.

Measured from the knuckle, my right middle finger is almost 2 centimeters longer than the right index finger. But measured from the first crease in the palm they are only about a half a centimeter different(middle still being longer).

On the left hand, however, my middle finger is clearly longer, both at a glance and measured(2.4 cm longer in fact)

The reason I mention this all is because it seems like there are a number of ways that the measurement could be reported incorrectly, and although there is a clear correlation here regarding gender differentiation, I would not read into it much beyond that.

[quote]Malevolence wrote:
This has come up a few times over the years. I’ve never really figured how you’re supposed to measure your fingers. At a glance, if my fingers are closed together, they look almost the same, but if I spread my fingers the middle finger is clearly longer.

Measured from the knuckle, my right middle finger is almost 2 centimeters longer than the right index finger. But measured from the first crease in the palm they are only about a half a centimeter different(middle still being longer).

On the left hand, however, my middle finger is clearly longer, both at a glance and measured(2.4 cm longer in fact)

The reason I mention this all is because it seems like there are a number of ways that the measurement could be reported incorrectly, thus I would not read into the data too much.

[/quote]

you really put a lot of thought into this.
You know what they say about people with big shoes.

That’s something else entirely. I wear a size 13-14 shoe, and honestly, even when a shoe is size 13-14, it rarely fits me quite right. It’s like they stop trying past size 12.

Dude, I know what you mean. I had to go to 3 stores before I found size 14 snowboard boots. And I grew out of Ipaths, which are badass shoes that I can no longer wear.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Long enough to do the job…

whoops. thought this was the sex forum.[/quote]

and I first read it as “How Long is Your …well you can fill in the blank”

um…no

Journalists are fucking losers. As are the people who do these studies. And the people who come up with this stupid shit. And the people who participate.

About a quarter inch shy of my brain!

[quote]hardgnr wrote:
um…no

Journalists are fucking losers. As are the people who do these studies. And the people who come up with this stupid shit. And the people who participate.[/quote]

Eh, there is actual science behind this. The conclusions about success, wealth, masculinity…etc aren’t particularly strong. But, finger lengths are a sexual dimorphism, and something that is related to hormone exposure in the womb.

It has been said that tall people make more money than short people, that may be a stupid conclusion, but it does not change the fact that there are tall people and short people and their heights are genetic.

hmmm…

[quote]hardgnr wrote:
um…no

Journalists are fucking losers. As are the people who do these studies. And the people who come up with this stupid shit. And the people who participate.[/quote]

you sound bitter about something

[quote]wukey wrote:
hardgnr wrote:
um…no

Journalists are fucking losers. As are the people who do these studies. And the people who come up with this stupid shit. And the people who participate.

you sound bitter about something[/quote]

I am not bitter. There are many factors which attribute to one’s success. A long finger is not one of them.

[quote]hardgnr wrote:
wukey wrote:
hardgnr wrote:
um…no

Journalists are fucking losers. As are the people who do these studies. And the people who come up with this stupid shit. And the people who participate.

you sound bitter about something

I am not bitter. There are many factors which attribute to one’s success. A long finger is not one of them.[/quote]

its a fair point, but the thread clearly upset you enough to start cursing and branding everyone envolved a looser. and besides, i can think of at least one activity where a long finger is a distinct advantage :wink:

[quote]wukey wrote:
hardgnr wrote:
wukey wrote:
hardgnr wrote:
um…no

Journalists are fucking losers. As are the people who do these studies. And the people who come up with this stupid shit. And the people who participate.

you sound bitter about something

I am not bitter. There are many factors which attribute to one’s success. A long finger is not one of them.

its a fair point, but the thread clearly upset you enough to start cursing and branding everyone envolved a looser. and besides, i can think of at least one activity where a long finger is a distinct advantage ;)[/quote]

I’m just sick of gay studies. Time could be spent studying on actual useful stuff imo.

[quote]hardgnr wrote:
wukey wrote:
hardgnr wrote:
wukey wrote:
hardgnr wrote:
um…no

Journalists are fucking losers. As are the people who do these studies. And the people who come up with this stupid shit. And the people who participate.

you sound bitter about something

I am not bitter. There are many factors which attribute to one’s success. A long finger is not one of them.

its a fair point, but the thread clearly upset you enough to start cursing and branding everyone envolved a looser. and besides, i can think of at least one activity where a long finger is a distinct advantage :wink:

I’m just sick of gay studies. Time could be spent studying on actual useful stuff imo.[/quote]

yeah, but this is the kind of stuff that gets noticed. afterall we all need an ‘and finally’ storey or else the news and the media in general would be a very depressing place. if you want this stuff to go away you need to ignor it. afterall any reaction is a good reaction.