I thought this was a fun little story on how hillary’s people planted questions in the crowd. Isn’t that kind of like lip syncing?
I am shocked!
[quote]lixy wrote:
I am shocked![/quote]
I trust that is sarcasm right? What I find more shocking is Fred Barnes talking about how it is something of a non-issue because he doesn’t think there’s anything seriously wrong with it. Hell, back in my College Republican days I took some classes with the Leadership Institute, a conservative activist group, and they instructed you to do something like have people with red pens in the audience so that way the candidate you’re helping knows that if they pick them it’ll be a plant. Again, another reason I don’t run with the party anymore.
If you have something to say…say it. Don’t use a plant. That’s cowardly and dishonest. I honestly believe Hillary didn’t know they were doing it, but it is indicative of the people she surrounds herself with.
mike
Mikeyali… think about it.
Hilliary didn’t know she was using plants, she just knew the exact people to choose for questions.
Does that make any sense?
Just like FEMA a couple of weeks ago, lol…
I’m sure Bush would never do anything like that. Right?
[quote]Mikeyali wrote:
lixy wrote:
I am shocked!
I trust that is sarcasm right? What I find more shocking is Fred Barnes talking about how it is something of a non-issue because he doesn’t think there’s anything seriously wrong with it. Hell, back in my College Republican days I took some classes with the Leadership Institute, a conservative activist group, and they instructed you to do something like have people with red pens in the audience so that way the candidate you’re helping knows that if they pick them it’ll be a plant. Again, another reason I don’t run with the party anymore.
If you have something to say…say it. Don’t use a plant. That’s cowardly and dishonest. I honestly believe Hillary didn’t know they were doing it, but it is indicative of the people she surrounds herself with.
mike[/quote]
Hillary is a control freak, she knew exactely what was going on and probably ordered it to be done. No I do not know for sure. But it seems unlikely she wouldn’t have known given her past. Also, she just happened to know who to pick, that’s pretty much a dead give away.
[quote]muffin man wrote:
I’m sure Bush would never do anything like that. Right?[/quote]
Hey, muffin man.
Provide proof that George W. Bush or his campaign ever planted a single question.
If you can’t, then shut your gluttonous pie-hole.
Either way, thanks in advance.
JeffR
[quote]Wreckless wrote:
I’m sure Bush would never do anything like that. Right?[/quote]
Bush’s run has one year to go. He can’t run again. Let it go. He was a stealth-lib who tried to destroy conservatism. He’s been found out and discreditted. We no longer take his as the voice of conservatism.
Now a question: if Hitler was running againstBush in an election and you HAD to vote, who would you choose, Wreckless? Just curious.
[quote]pat36 wrote:
I thought this was a fun little story on how hillary’s people planted questions in the crowd. Isn’t that kind of like lip syncing?[/quote]
Pat,
It is far worse than lip syncing.
Here is how her campaign treats the press: http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=6e01fdce-ad97-4dab-a07d-bf98dc52f681
Control of media. Control of questions. Inability to answer anything that isn’t friendly and/or scripted.
I thought these actions were relagated to communists, dictators, or fascists.
Do you democrats want to win this badly?
JeffR
Here they are trying to influence wolf blitzer (another famous Conservative) and his questions for this thursday’s debate.
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=6e01fdce-ad97-4dab-a07d-bf98dc52f681
TELL ME AGAIN, PEOPLE, just how imminent a clinton Presidency is?
JeffR
I’m going to be pretty conflicted if this cunt gets the Democratic nomination against a non- Ron Paul Republican.
I could be wrong, but I have the feeling that Clinton would bring more of the same in Washington. She’s full of the same bullshit and doublespeak that’s coming out of the White House today.
The very fact that the Bushes and the Clinton’s hold so much political influence is worrisome. America’s not about dynasties and royalty, but that’s fast changing. Hell, we haven’t been without a Bush/Clinton in the White House since the Carter Administration!
I’m sure it wasn’t Bill who ‘busted’ Hillary. Word on the street is that she was busted by a ‘train’ back in college.
[quote]JeffR wrote:
Here they are trying to influence wolf blitzer (another famous Conservative) and his questions for this thursday’s debate.
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=6e01fdce-ad97-4dab-a07d-bf98dc52f681
TELL ME AGAIN, PEOPLE, just how imminent a clinton Presidency is?
JeffR[/quote]
To many people loath the bitch for her to win. Hell, I thought Kerry was a shoe in '04, but that som-bitch was so unlikable that a president with a low approval rating still won. I hope I am right, but I just don’t see it happening.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
I’m sure it wasn’t Bill who ‘busted’ Hillary. Word on the street is that she was busted by a ‘train’ back in college.
:D[/quote]
And those poor bastards still need to wash their dicks cause of that. You know that stuff don’t cure.
[quote]pat36 wrote:
JeffR wrote:
Here they are trying to influence wolf blitzer (another famous Conservative) and his questions for this thursday’s debate.
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=6e01fdce-ad97-4dab-a07d-bf98dc52f681
TELL ME AGAIN, PEOPLE, just how imminent a clinton Presidency is?
JeffR
To many people loath the bitch for her to win. Hell, I thought Kerry was a shoe in '04, but that som-bitch was so unlikable that a president with a low approval rating still won. I hope I am right, but I just don’t see it happening.[/quote]
Pat,
Watch over the next 2-3 weeks as the liberal media begins to remove their protection. Watch how many ugly stories begin to be reported.
You’ve seen some since her bubble of invincibility was pierced.
Attacks on Russert, not tipping a waitress, playing her desperation card: gender, and now planting questions.
I honestly didn’t think she’d implode this early.
I thought it would take Rudy to get her to flip out publicly.
The interesting question is: Is obama ready to take advantage?
A more experienced politician would be able to portray himself as the obvious alternative.
We’ll see.
JeffR
P.S. The silence from 100 meters/bradley/lumpy is deafening.
[quote]JeffR wrote:
pat36 wrote:
JeffR wrote:
Here they are trying to influence wolf blitzer (another famous Conservative) and his questions for this thursday’s debate.
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=6e01fdce-ad97-4dab-a07d-bf98dc52f681
TELL ME AGAIN, PEOPLE, just how imminent a clinton Presidency is?
JeffR
To many people loath the bitch for her to win. Hell, I thought Kerry was a shoe in '04, but that som-bitch was so unlikable that a president with a low approval rating still won. I hope I am right, but I just don’t see it happening.
Pat,
Watch over the next 2-3 weeks as the liberal media begins to remove their protection. Watch how many ugly stories begin to be reported.
You’ve seen some since her bubble of invincibility was pierced.
Attacks on Russert, not tipping a waitress, playing her desperation card: gender, and now planting questions.
I honestly didn’t think she’d implode this early.
I thought it would take Rudy to get her to flip out publicly.
The interesting question is: Is obama ready to take advantage?
A more experienced politician would be able to portray himself as the obvious alternative.
We’ll see.
JeffR
P.S. The silence from 100 meters/bradley/lumpy is deafening.
[/quote]
I agree. That said, the not tipping a waitress rumor turned out false according to Brit Hume.
mike
[quote]JeffR wrote:
muffin man wrote:
I’m sure Bush would never do anything like that. Right?
Hey, muffin man.
Provide proof that George W. Bush or his campaign ever planted a single question.
If you can’t, then shut your gluttonous pie-hole.
Either way, thanks in advance.
JeffR [/quote]
You shouldn’t have called my bluff Effr0.
Here’s my ace: Jeff Gannon.
This is what wikipedia has to say about him:
[i]Gannon first gained national attention during a presidential press conference on January 26, 2005, in which he asked United States President George W. Bush a question that some in the press corps considered “so friendly it might have been planted.”[1] Gannon stated that this question was not meant to be friendly, but to expose the hypocrisy of the left.[citation needed]
Gannon then came under public scrutiny, in particular for his lack of a significant journalistic background prior to his work with Talon[2][3] and his alleged involvement with various homosexual escort service websites using the professional name Bulldog
…
Gannon routinely obtained daily passes to White House briefings. He attended four Bush press conferences and appeared regularly at White House press briefings. Although he did not qualify for a Congressional press pass, Gannon was given daily passes to White House press briefings “after supplying his real name, date of birth and Social Security number.”[/i]
And this is Gannon the Cannon at work, asking tough questions: “Senate Democratic leaders have painted a very bleak picture of the U.S. economy. Harry Reid was talking about soup lines. And Hillary Clinton was talking about the economy being on the verge of collapse. Yet in the same breath they say that Social Security is rock solid and there’s no crisis there. How are you going to work – you’ve said you are going to reach out to these people – how are you going to work with people who seem to have divorced themselves from reality?”
Had enough Effr0 ? ? ?
[quote]Mick28 wrote:
It should come as no surprise that the Clintons will say and do anything to get elected. Planting questions among audience members is nothing compared to what could be exposed about Hillary.
Bill and Hillary are loathsome detestable people.[/quote]
I know you like to pretend you can choose between Hillary and perfection.
But ask yourself this question, will the Clintons lie and get thousands of people killed in an avoidable war? Let’s not forget the big picture here.