[quote]rainjack wrote:
Nate Dogg wrote:
rainjack wrote:
iamthewolf wrote:
i was just curious if anyone else has begun seeing commercials (sponsored by the corn refiners association) spinning high fructose corn syrup as a completely acceptable additive / alternative to sugar. i don’t know if these are just being shown regionally (i’m in boston), or if this is a nationwide campaign to promote this junk.
after laughing at the commercials with my girlfriend she found the following link, which just pushes this whole spectacle over the edge:
i just think it’s funny, and a little sad, that they’re trying to convince people that hfcs is “ok in moderation.” i mean, are the corn farmers and refiners really hurting that much? hfcs is in just about every processed food known to man. plus, corn is a government subsidized crop after all…
I’ll leave the HFCS bullshit alone, for now. But do you have any clue how utterly ignorant you are about farming, and just how the subsidy programs work in the US?
I doubt it. You are just another bandwagoneer who hasn’t a fucking clue about what he is talking about other than you heard a buzzword, and wanted to sound really cool on the internet.
Dude - know what the fuck you are talking about before you start acting like an expert on it. There is probably a pretty good chance that you will get called on it - kinda like right now.
Don’t let dear old rainjack get under you skin. It seems as though he’s suffering from some post-vacation depression. Or maybe a farmer just rammed a pitchfork up his ass.
High Fructose Corn Syrup is the devil. I can’t believe they are saying it’s okay to consume in moderation. That’s just like saying trans fats are okay for you as well. Just ridiculous.
And yeah, I agree about the government and how they subsidize corn with the farmers. At one point, they were paying farmers all kinds of money to continue growing corn in order to keep the market up. There was some good info about this in Don Alessi’s book “Don’t Diet.”
I’ve also watched a good report on 20/20 that talked about something similar last year.
I don’t know all the ins and outs of how the government works out this subsidizing program, but the fact that we are paying farmers to grow corn to meet the needs of the government is a little out of control.
We don’t need HFCS, nor do we need so much freakin’ corn. It’s bad enough that corn is fed to our cattle, chicken, etc. And they use it for everything these days including cereals, grains and now even in our gasoline (a whole other story - short version: ethanol sucks).
Corn is a crappy food, especially with as much of it that the government and food manufacturers try to ram down our gullets in a variety of ways.
I don’t eat corn or foods containing corn or HFCS, but unfortunately, I eat meat from the grocery store that has been fed mostly corn as part of its diet. The only way to avoid this is to buy grass-fed/organic beef and chicken, but that’s not always feasible due to price and availability.
And people wonder why the world’s obesity population keeps increasing. Even in countries that never had a weight problem before (Japan and Australia), they are now some of the most obese places thanks to American fast food, corn, HFCS, white flour and other processed breads and cereals along with lack of physical activity.
Nate - you are a great guy, but you REALLY REALLY REALLY don’t want to get into a farming argument with me. Taking your farming info from Don Alessi, or 20/20 is like getting training information from the back of a box of Frosted Flakes.
Your beef from the store has been fed a ration of, at most, a 60% grain - and not all of it corn. The rest is alfalfa hay.
Obesity is a function of inactivity more than it is nutrition.
You are in over your head here. Leave now, and you will be spared. Stay at your own risk. I have given you fair warning.
[/quote]
Besides the fact that he is a little mislead on what a subsidy is, I agree with him in principle. Subsidies hurt the economy in the long run and are often times based on government lobbyists. I’m curious as to your support of subsidies in relation to how they effect the economy as a whole.