we just opened a new office, and i am working some days 14-15 hours, so it will be a while before i get to read this. but it is on my list for sure.
i am interested to see the journals he references, and some long-term effects of the medications. he does mention some institutions that use a non-pharmaceutical treatment plan first.
"I came across the World Health Organizations outcomes study for schizophrenia patients, and found that outcomes were better for poor countries of the world – like India, Colombia, Nigeria – than for the rich countries. And I was startled to find that only a small percentage of patients in those countries were medicated. I also discovered that the number of people on disability for mental illness in this country has tripled over the last 20 years.
If our psychiatric drugs are effective at preventing mental illness, I thought, why are we getting so many people unable to work? I felt we needed to look at long-term outcomes and ask: What does the evidence show? Are we improving long-term outcomes or not?" (from the article)
and i am interested about this treatment facility in Finland:
“…Keropudas Hospitals program in Finland. They have 20 years of great results treating newly psychotic patients. They see if patients can get better without the use of meds, and if they cant, then they try them. Its a best-use model, not a no-use or anti-med model.”
i think that philosophy of “best-use” for a pharmaceutical model works best overall, generally, excluding emergencies. i think that so many people are a little too trigger-happy to swallow pills for short term relief, and i think thats why we have the pharma-related problems in this country. but at the same time, i know that psych problems are immense, and devastating for the pt and their families.
interestingly, if you look at the pharmaceutical-related deaths/injuries in the literature, there is a big difference between the US statistics and other countries (not talking about psych-drugs specifically). our overall quality of health is in the shitter comparatively. it’s a complex, multi-faceted issue, but to be sarcastic, americans scarf down everything in mass quantities, and just looove anything that has a flashy commercial.
good point: my gf says every day, that more and more of her patients come in and “tell her” what medications they are going to be prescribed from her. and they are sometimes adamant about it. she cannot fathom that there are pharma ads on tv in the US…
i am interested in this topic, bc my experience with pharma-related issues has not been psych-related, and thats why i posted and asked who had direct experience with these. i know of certain people who have had devastating experience with these, but i also know that my small sample size of experience is a case-by-case thing, and not necessarily representative of the whole matter.