Pelosi was asked what would happen if the money generated from the “sur tax” generated more than required to provide this universal healthcare, what would happen to the left over money? She said it could applied to the national debt. Why wouldn’t that money be refunded to those who provided the initial capital for the healthcare?
[quote]MaximusB wrote:
Pelosi was asked what would happen if the money generated from the “sur tax” generated more than required to provide this universal healthcare, what would happen to the left over money? She said it could applied to the national debt. Why wouldn’t that money be refunded to those who provided the initial capital for the healthcare?[/quote]
No chance.
NO CHANCE does that money get used for the debt. The 1st bi-partisan act since WWII will be to find a way/reason to spend that on something.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
Pelosi was asked what would happen if the money generated from the “sur tax” generated more than required to provide this universal healthcare, what would happen to the left over money? She said it could applied to the national debt. Why wouldn’t that money be refunded to those who provided the initial capital for the healthcare?
I find it ironic that Palin is the woman called the “Pig” by one TN poster in part because she returns oil wealth dollars directly to the residents of her state when in fact Pelosi displays the porcine characteristics by hogging and feasting on the taxpayer’s money. Deep down inside Pelosi, Obama and their ilk feel ALL the wealth in this country belongs to the government and aren’t we lucky that they allow us to hang on to some of it.[/quote]
Yup. Because they are SMARTER than all of us.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Valor wrote:
pushharder wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
Pelosi was asked what would happen if the money generated from the “sur tax” generated more than required to provide this universal healthcare, what would happen to the left over money? She said it could applied to the national debt. Why wouldn’t that money be refunded to those who provided the initial capital for the healthcare?
I find it ironic that Palin is the woman called the “Pig” by one TN poster in part because she returns oil wealth dollars directly to the residents of her state when in fact Pelosi displays the porcine characteristics by hogging and feasting on the taxpayer’s money. Deep down inside Pelosi, Obama and their ilk feel ALL the wealth in this country belongs to the government and aren’t we lucky that they allow us to hang on to some of it.
Yup. Because they are SMARTER than all of us.
Sure thing. Palin is stupid and a serious threat to America. Pelosi is smart and benevolent and just trying to what’s best for the people. Liberals are sumptin else, aint they?[/quote]
Palin could have been something…she F’ed up when she quit…I think. Pelosi is the fucking devil.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
Valor wrote:
pushharder wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
Pelosi was asked what would happen if the money generated from the “sur tax” generated more than required to provide this universal healthcare, what would happen to the left over money? She said it could applied to the national debt. Why wouldn’t that money be refunded to those who provided the initial capital for the healthcare?
I find it ironic that Palin is the woman called the “Pig” by one TN poster in part because she returns oil wealth dollars directly to the residents of her state when in fact Pelosi displays the porcine characteristics by hogging and feasting on the taxpayer’s money. Deep down inside Pelosi, Obama and their ilk feel ALL the wealth in this country belongs to the government and aren’t we lucky that they allow us to hang on to some of it.
Yup. Because they are SMARTER than all of us.
Sure thing. Palin is stupid and a serious threat to America. Pelosi is smart and benevolent and just trying to what’s best for the people. Liberals are sumptin else, aint they?[/quote]
They really are to much.
Thread hijack, for you true American fired up guys: www.rangerup.com. no sissy ass liberals are allowed to buy cool shirts there.
I ordered the USN SEALS memorandum shirt, Homeland security threat list, I club hippies, and don’t tread on me. to bad but for us jacked guys, the My ops are blacker than your ops shirt in XL is on a wait.
The CBO guy today testified that their analysis indicates what anybody with a triple digit IQ has known all along. That is that present plan would cost a hell of a lot more than the Dems are saying.
OUTRAGEOUS!!! Who would have ever thought that?
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
The CBO guy today testified that their analysis indicates what anybody with a triple digit IQ has known all along. That is that present plan would cost a hell of a lot more than the Dems are saying.
OUTRAGEOUS!!! Who would have ever thought that?[/quote]
Not me, haha! These people will bankrupt the country. Maggie Thatcher once said that socialism is a great idea until you run out of someone else’s money.
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=332548165656854
Anybody seen this? Apparently the bill will outlaw private coverage (effectively). You can keep what you have, but can never change plans or enroll new people. Unless re-written, elimination of all private coverage is not some right wing conspiracy. They are attempting it in this bill.
[quote]tom63 wrote:
Tiribulus wrote:
The CBO guy today testified that their analysis indicates what anybody with a triple digit IQ has known all along. That is that present plan would cost a hell of a lot more than the Dems are saying.
OUTRAGEOUS!!! Who would have ever thought that?
Not me, haha! These people will bankrupt the country. Maggie Thatcher once said that socialism is a great idea until you run out of someone else’s money.[/quote]
That is a great quote LOL.
[quote]tom63 wrote:
pushharder wrote:
Valor wrote:
pushharder wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
Pelosi was asked what would happen if the money generated from the “sur tax” generated more than required to provide this universal healthcare, what would happen to the left over money? She said it could applied to the national debt. Why wouldn’t that money be refunded to those who provided the initial capital for the healthcare?
I find it ironic that Palin is the woman called the “Pig” by one TN poster in part because she returns oil wealth dollars directly to the residents of her state when in fact Pelosi displays the porcine characteristics by hogging and feasting on the taxpayer’s money. Deep down inside Pelosi, Obama and their ilk feel ALL the wealth in this country belongs to the government and aren’t we lucky that they allow us to hang on to some of it.
Yup. Because they are SMARTER than all of us.
Sure thing. Palin is stupid and a serious threat to America. Pelosi is smart and benevolent and just trying to what’s best for the people. Liberals are sumptin else, aint they?
They really are to much.
Thread hijack, for you true American fired up guys: www.rangerup.com. no sissy ass liberals are allowed to buy cool shirts there.
I ordered the USN SEALS memorandum shirt, Homeland security threat list, I club hippies, and don’t tread on me. to bad but for us jacked guys, the My ops are blacker than your ops shirt in XL is on a wait.[/quote]
Ahh… no hippie ass liberals, just wannabe militiamen.
Keep it.
[quote]tom63 wrote:
pushharder wrote:
Valor wrote:
pushharder wrote:
MaximusB wrote:
Pelosi was asked what would happen if the money generated from the “sur tax” generated more than required to provide this universal healthcare, what would happen to the left over money? She said it could applied to the national debt. Why wouldn’t that money be refunded to those who provided the initial capital for the healthcare?
I find it ironic that Palin is the woman called the “Pig” by one TN poster in part because she returns oil wealth dollars directly to the residents of her state when in fact Pelosi displays the porcine characteristics by hogging and feasting on the taxpayer’s money. Deep down inside Pelosi, Obama and their ilk feel ALL the wealth in this country belongs to the government and aren’t we lucky that they allow us to hang on to some of it.
Yup. Because they are SMARTER than all of us.
Sure thing. Palin is stupid and a serious threat to America. Pelosi is smart and benevolent and just trying to what’s best for the people. Liberals are sumptin else, aint they?
They really are to much.
Thread hijack, for you true American fired up guys: www.rangerup.com. no sissy ass liberals are allowed to buy cool shirts there.
I ordered the USN SEALS memorandum shirt, Homeland security threat list, I club hippies, and don’t tread on me. to bad but for us jacked guys, the My ops are blacker than your ops shirt in XL is on a wait.[/quote]
Ahh… no hippie ass liberals, just wannabe militiamen.
Keep it.
[quote]Tiribulus wrote:
The CBO guy today testified that their analysis indicates what anybody with a triple digit IQ has known all along. That is that present plan would cost a hell of a lot more than the Dems are saying.
OUTRAGEOUS!!! Who would have ever thought that?[/quote]
The interesting part about this entire debacle is that the middle class will indeed end up paying higher taxes in order to support this and the many other outrageous bills that are on Obama’s wish list. The rich simply do not have enough money to support this stupidity.
I wonder how all of the middle class Obama supporters will feel when the tax man comes a knocking on their door and not just the evil rich?
As a business owner (therefore I must be evil) my reaction to this massive tax increase will be two-fold:
I have several employees who are going to get a reduction in pay when this nonsense becomes law and that’s unfortunate because they don’t deserve this, but neither do I. In addition to this I am going to raise prices on all of my merchandise. I’m just not going to carry the entire burden myself.
I wonder if Obama thought about this type of reaction when he was meditating in his ivory tower?
Can anyone else see massive inflation heading our way?
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=332548165656854
Anybody seen this? Apparently the bill will outlaw private coverage (effectively). You can keep what you have, but can never change plans or enroll new people. Unless re-written, elimination of all private coverage is not some right wing conspiracy. They are attempting it in this bill.[/quote]
I’ve seen this posted on other sites as well. So basically, this means that a person without coverage can no longer purchase private healthcare? They have to buy the government’s option? Fuck that.
Can someone tell me if this is accurate?
[quote]BackInAction wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=332548165656854
Anybody seen this? Apparently the bill will outlaw private coverage (effectively). You can keep what you have, but can never change plans or enroll new people. Unless re-written, elimination of all private coverage is not some right wing conspiracy. They are attempting it in this bill.
I’ve seen this posted on other sites as well. So basically, this means that a person without coverage can no longer purchase private healthcare? They have to buy the government’s option? Fuck that.
Can someone tell me if this is accurate?[/quote]
That is in fact accurate.
[quote]ZEB wrote:
As a business owner (therefore I must be evil) my reaction to this massive tax increase will be two-fold:
I have several employees who are going to get a reduction in pay when this nonsense becomes law and that’s unfortunate because they don’t deserve this, but neither do I. In addition to this I am going to raise prices on all of my merchandise. I’m just not going to carry the entire burden myself.
I wonder if Obama thought about this type of reaction when he was meditating in his ivory tower?
Can anyone else see massive inflation heading our way?[/quote]
Not only does he know he is planning on it. Why else you think he wants it pushed through so fast. People are beginning to read this thing and their is nothing good about this bill.
[quote]BackInAction wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=332548165656854
Anybody seen this? Apparently the bill will outlaw private coverage (effectively). You can keep what you have, but can never change plans or enroll new people. Unless re-written, elimination of all private coverage is not some right wing conspiracy. They are attempting it in this bill.
I’ve seen this posted on other sites as well. So basically, this means that a person without coverage can no longer purchase private healthcare? They have to buy the government’s option? Fuck that.
Can someone tell me if this is accurate?[/quote]
If you are ever to drop private coverage with a job change or anything, you can no longer get private insurance.