See? This is why I said before: Real men need a NEMESIS. You know why women are more emotionally sound? Because every woman has one or more.
Shut up SJWs. GPT hallucinated and wrote the above, not me.
1 Like
Back on topic in a surprisingly accurate way.
2 Likes
Thanks. Will listen later.
Here’s this one on the Chad Williamson… ahem… I mean, the Chris Williamson podcast.
He recently did an episode with Chris Bumstead.
2 Likes
Good article.
“Men Have Lost Reason To Work
This new dynamic has freed men from work. In his new book Bachelor Pad Economics, Aaron Clarey advocates a minimalist approach to money – buy only what your need and using your time for your benefit rather than a corporation’s. This approach is already being taken as men drop out of the system, earn less than women, and avoid higher eduction.
The reason men worked hard was to provide for their families. Men didn’t work long hours out of self-interest. They did so out of love. Most men can subsist on very little. It’s been said that civilization was created to impress the opposite gender. Without reward, there is no reason to work. No carrot, no jump.”
1 Like
Very good, but I am sure labeled as misogyny and bigotry.
1 Like
At this point, if these nuts on the left are calling you racist, bigot, - phobe, etc. I consider it a badge of honor at this point. If those who claim to be my enemies disagree with me, I know, then, that I am on the right track.
1 Like
I’d consider examining this type of reasoning.
Consider away.
You should too, because your “logic” is unsound. I suppose it only matters if you care about being correct in your beliefs.
Oh, I’ll definitely keep you “top of mind” regarding my “logic”. I sure don’t want to upset you.
I think this is a matter of beliefs and preferences. As I propose in my Balkanization thread, isn’t it better for people seriously at odds with one another to disassociate, regardless if any are right or wrong?
1 Like
Some folks simply cannot identify satire, irony and facetiousness and/ or generally lack a sense of humor about anything and take everything literal, presumably a setup for a ‘gotcha’ moment? Meh…
I prefer my methods of reasoning to be sound reliable ways of coming to correct conclusions. @pat apparently does not as he is sticking to his guns about using an argument that is demonstrably fallacious. If he wants to stick to his argument of: I don’t like these people, they disagree with me, therefore I am right, he is free to. I just think it is silly is all.
You didn’t write that as satire. You now do see the error of it though, so I guess that is a win.
The American education system, folks! Good job, that wasn’t satire, it was facetiousness. Yes, you win! You win soooo much! You, sir, are a winner. the winningest winner of all winningness.
Are you saying that my beliefs don’t matter and i should just accept
i know this wasn’t toward me specifically, but it is a general question
I think the idea is that your believes should be shaped by your personal values and experiences.
Not decided by just being the opposite of your “enemies” believes.
2 Likes
I am not sure what you are getting at?
I also don’t know exactly what belief Pat had when he said:
All I was trying to convey is that you may be right or wrong about your belief, but using that kind of reasoning isn’t a reliable path to knowing your belief is correct.
Love one another, even your enemies
but, can’t accept the sin