[quote]dmaddox wrote:
Bill Roberts wrote:
Lonnie123 wrote:
Seattle_Lifter wrote:
According to CBS News if you went to the doctor in the last 3 months and the doctor said you likely had swine flu there’s a 98% chance you didn’t have swine flu.
Only July 24th the CDC stopped testing for Swine flu. Now if you present with flu like symptoms the CDC assumes you have swine flu and counts you as another to their fake tally.
There seems to be a lot of deception going on here. Here’s a link to the CBS News Story
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/10/21/cbsnews_investigates/main5404829.shtml
Look at the chart. Of those that presented with flu like symptoms before July 24th only about 2% really had the swine flu. Now the CDC seems to be exagerating by a 50:1 ratio.
This is quite a claim, that the CDC is saying 100% of people with flu like symptoms have swine flu.
I work in an Emergency Room, and we test everybody that comes in with flu like symptoms for both the regular and H1N1 flu. The results of that test go to the CDC for tracking positive or not for H1N1. We do not just assume you have swine flu and report it that way.
Are you aware that the current swine flu is by no means the only sort of H1N1 flu? I ask, because most seem not to be. Which is no wonder given the way that the media, the government, and doctors present information on it.
H1N1 flus have long been quite common. A person who has had several flus has more than likely had one or more H1N1 flus already.
Being H1N1 does not of itself make a flu the current swine flu.
I have to disagree on this one. H1N1 is the designation of this type of flu and only this type of flue, but there are 3 different strains of the the seasonal flu, that everyone knows about. The researchers guess which strain is going to come out the next year and make a vaccine. They dont know if the vaccine worked until the end of the season.[/quote]
Well, I can present you with the fact of the matter, as I have above: it is up to you as to whether to learn from it or to stick with incorrect belief on what is a matter of fact, not opinion.
I don’t have a suggested resource for you beyond my own providing of the information, which you choose to deny: this (categorization of influenza viruses) is simply one of the many things one picks up in the course of any extensive study of microbiology. It would likely be no more trouble for you to search out some Internet-accessible source to inform you of this fact of influenza virus categorization, rather than simply assuming me wrong, than it would be for me to do that for you.
And in any case it seems as far as you are concerned, you know already anyhow.