[quote]kevinm1 wrote:
[quote]sardines12 wrote:
It’s earth 2 Allan Scott who gives a shit.[/quote]
I care the JSA when done right are badass but DC has been screwing with them for years, although Geoff Johns was able to give them their due this lame ass reboot has delegated them to Leifeld art and obsucrity[/quote]
[quote]FrozenNinja wrote:
2. There isn’t any scientific, with out a shout of a doubt, conclusive evidence that proves that homosexuals are indeed born that way.
[/quote]
So this decision means :
-That the amount of potential mates he (from now on, I’ll skip the ‘she’, but it’s included) has gets reduced to 5-10%.
-That his chances to have children get limited to alternative methods (surrogacy, in vitro, adoption).
-That he’s going to be facing heavy prejudices even in the most ‘progressive’ societies. This will include not being able to marry and thus get the social benefits that heterosexual couples can have, even displaying any affection in public without being the center of attention or at worst, being killed or jailed for it like in many muslim countries. Not to mention log on your favourite forum to see that someone is comparing your love to your partner with necrophilia or beastiality. That must sting.
Seriously, who in his right mind would choose this? Why would someone in Iran or whatever choose to be homosexual? Total non-sense.
-Why are there so many homosexuals that were never abused in their youth?
-There are people who were abused on their youth and they engage in self-destructive behaviours that are of heterosexual nature.
It’s not consistant.
There may not be any scientific study that shows that homosexuals are born this way, but homosexuality is also present in animals and they are unable to make such choices. Like a person with some common sense. It’s just increasing the difficulty of your life by large margins.
Now i have no interest in comics, but since this thread has gone more towards the subject of gays, I might share some ethical questions:
“Homosexuality is also present in animals”. Many animal eat their species, is that ethically ok? (And yes, there have been, and maybe still are, cultures where this is not wrong, does that make it acceptable?)
If homosexuality can’t be wrong “because they love each others, and it doesn’t hurt anyone” then how can you condem incest (it’s legal in many European coutries as long as it’s between adults) or human-animal relationships?
[quote]FrozenNinja wrote:
IDK. I don’t like it. Comic books should be safe for childeren…but then again…they are sexualized to point.
Still I wouldn’t want my child reading about Super gay green Lantern banging his super gay boyfriend…lol
THOUGHTS?[/quote]
I dont think it’s necessary either but him being gay doesn’t automatically mean that it will be sexual.
[quote]Halapeno wrote:
Now i have no interest in comics, but since this thread has gone more towards the subject of gays, I might share some ethical questions:
Irrelevant to the issue he was addressing. The question was whether they were born that way and had nothing to do with moral considerations.
Quit with the Straw men. Incest and Beastiality are completely different issues. It’s on you to provide evidence as to what harm homosexuality can do that isn’t present in heterosexuality, otherwise stay out of the discussion with such nonsense.
As long as the hero maintains his integrity and observes and carries out the tenets of his philosophy that benefit mankind, I couldn’t care less if he was a midget tranny with a fetish for hairless animals.
Well, maybe not THAT, but you get the idea.
[quote]Edevus wrote:
[quote]gregron wrote:
[quote]Edevus wrote:
I hope you don’t breed or your children will be miserable for having such a retarded bigot as a father.
[/quote]
^^LOL… The butthurt (no pun intended) is strong with this one.
Bigot:
noun
1.�?� a person who is utterly intolerant of any differing creed, belief, or opinion.
You being intolerant of his opinion about homosexual relationships would kinda make you a bigot as well.[/quote]
It’s very cool that you decided to take a definition that helped you to make the joke. Let’s take this one which is quite similar :
Ohh, it doesn’t work anymore.
[/quote]
LOL.
Listen buddy, I’m glad you realize that I was making a joke (kinda like the one from the Austin Powers movie) not sure why you obviously got so butthurt about a joke that you realized and acknowledged was a joke with your own post, seems strange.
Also, I didnt “decide to take a quote that fits my joke” I just pulled up the first quote on google which was from Dictionary.com, FYI.
Relax guy, it was just a joke.
[quote]HeavyTriple wrote:
[quote]Halapeno wrote:
Now i have no interest in comics, but since this thread has gone more towards the subject of gays, I might share some ethical questions:
Irrelevant to the issue he was addressing. The question was whether they were born that way and had nothing to do with moral considerations.
Quit with the Straw men. Incest and Beastiality are completely different issues. It’s on you to provide evidence as to what harm homosexuality can do that isn’t present in heterosexuality, otherwise stay out of the discussion with such nonsense.[/quote]
Thanks.
I’ll just add that human-animal relationships lack the consent and conscious decision factor.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
…It’s such a childish and simplistic view of the world. But then again, most of these people sit there thinking “everyone should be like me” instead of recognizing that people are not all the same.[/quote]
^^Oh the extreme irony.
[quote]Edevus wrote:
I’d say that Gregron picking up my “bigotry” but ignoring the fact that the OP said that gay sex is unhealthy and seems to happen only in rest stops makes him homophobic by association, no? And homophobes are…bigots.
[/quote]
Before this morning I had only made two posts in this thread and they were both jokes. I didn’t ignore the fact that thirdruffian (NOT the OP by the way) made his comments, I just chose not to dignify them with a responses.
I don’t believe what he believes but I don’t try to force my views on him. He can believe whatever he wants, just like I can and just like you can.
Its Green Latern. Does it matter?
[quote]four60 wrote:
Its Green Latern. Does it matter?[/quote]
LOL
BEST answer!
Not like we are talking about someone special from DC…like “SIX PAC”
Green Lantern > Batman. Just saying.
Hal Jordan FTW!
[quote]WolBarret wrote:
Green Lantern > Batman. Just saying.
Hal Jordan FTW![/quote]
The Lanterns have more Power but the Bat is a cooler character.
Batarang > Giant Green Fist
And thats why he always gets stuck with the Tab when he rolls into Gotham City.
[quote]four60 wrote:
[quote]WolBarret wrote:
Green Lantern > Batman. Just saying.
Hal Jordan FTW![/quote]
The Lanterns have more Power but the Bat is a cooler character.
Batarang > Giant Green Fist[/quote]
A pedo in a s and m outfit vs the most powerful weapon in the universe the GL wins
[quote]kevinm1 wrote:
[quote]four60 wrote:
[quote]WolBarret wrote:
Green Lantern > Batman. Just saying.
Hal Jordan FTW![/quote]
The Lanterns have more Power but the Bat is a cooler character.
Batarang > Giant Green Fist[/quote]
A pedo in a s and m outfit vs the most powerful weapon in the universe the GL wins[/quote]
Pic didn’t come out
Oh Batman>Green Lantern for sure!!!
[quote]kevinm1 wrote:
[quote]kevinm1 wrote:
[quote]four60 wrote:
[quote]WolBarret wrote:
Green Lantern > Batman. Just saying.
Hal Jordan FTW![/quote]
The Lanterns have more Power but the Bat is a cooler character.
Batarang > Giant Green Fist[/quote]
A pedo in a s and m outfit vs the most powerful weapon in the universe the GL wins[/quote]
Pic didn’t come out[/quote]
The ring is powerful, but lets be honest hahahah they will give that ring to anybody hahahah