In the case of most wagers of which you probably have zip for experience, once a wager is turned down it is up to the person turning it down, that would be you, to make a counter wager. Clear?
So, offer away mister bluster oh haughty one…
I look forward to seeing what you are made of although I sort of already know by reading all the hot air in your posts. My expectations are set very, very low. So go ahead.
Of course I see Trump as a threat – a nearly existential one. You really do read, reason, and respond like a child. Anyway, right there in my post I said, as I have all along, that a variety of developments/surprises/catastrophes could lead to a Trump victory in November. But anyway, it remains unlikely and I am totally fine with the odds.
However, again – in what possible universe would I not mind taking on a wager with no power to add risk to your book? Do you not understand how gambling and logic work? Do you not understand the theory here? Why would I accede to terms which are by definition incapable of visiting any specific damage upon you? If we pretend – and I do mean pretend, because you shouldn’t flatter yourself with the fiction that I give a shit – that your leaving here is to me a “prize,” I’m going to get it either way.
Did none of this really occur to you, you bumbling old dunce?
Totally fine yet still not on board. But, that is not unlike you is it? You will talk something to death while saying nothing. In this case you actually have to step up. Ouch, bet you have not done much of that in your life. The real world can hurt but you already know that.
Yawn…once again you do “give a shit” or you would not continue this dialogue. You care what everyone thinks you want to impress as many people as possible it helps you feel good about yourself. This is the second time you said you didn’t care what I thought, or my comments are inconsequential and yet you blather on and I am laughing at you.
Still waiting on your responses re: cases Garland got wrong.
Or have you changed your mind, and you now think he got them right?
Right or wrong? Which do you think?
We’re waiting.
One more post and still no counter offer. Maybe you are not as smart as you pretend to be. I will repeat myself. You turned down my wager it is therefore time for you to make a counter wager, at least that’s what men do so I don’t expect that you’re used to this type of thing. You like to jump on the message board spit out your usual endless blather and then disappear. Fun right? This time I am asking you to step up and make a mans bet. Difficult for you as you have danced all around the issue.
Still waiting for your counter wager if you can muster the courage…little girl.
If you’re a CEO and the rate of return on your performance isn’t better than the market return over the same period of return, nope, you’re not a kickass businessman.
If Trump worked as CEO or other owners, he wouldn’t have survived. Luckily for him, he was underperforming with his own money.
Wait, let me guess - business not a topic you know much about either?
Gave you your response. Remember the count down last night?
You never showed up to answer me you left. It was very disappointing. I hung around for a while and conversed with another member.
False. You asked me about the other cases, and I provided a response to those as well. And several of us chimed in that we are still waiting. And we are. No need to lie, yet again.
So, in those cases, Garland was wrong or right?
Your last post on the issue. It’s tomorrow now. Let’s hear your explanations. I look forward to your response.
Actually, I have a very extensive background in business but that is neither here nor there is it? As for Trump your problem is you have no idea how much he inherited or when he inherited it. Trump states that he was given 1 million dollars to start his empire. You can dispute that and we both know that he inherited more later on. But, if he is correct he went pretty far on that 1 million.
Another problem of yours and it is very glaring, is that when you don’t like someone you allege all sorts of negative traits to that person. As I have said many times for someone who fancies themselves to be logical you are over the top when it comes to emotion.
You are mistaken I gave you an answer scroll back.
I’m actually only hanging out now to see what your ball less buddy comes back with for a counter bet. Bet he writes 5 or 6 paragraphs and ends with his usual nothing.
Where are you smh?
No, you didn’t. Nowhere have you said why, after my explaining what the cases were about, Garland was wrong. Your words, “wrong” - surely you missed have a reason why you believe that?
Yes, I gave you an answer and you apparently don’t like it. Ha ha…didn’t I say what you wanted to hear? Oh my.
What is it you like to say TB? You have to keep up man. Scroll back your answer is there as plain as day
In fact I taunted you a bit with the above because you vanished from the forum last night
I’m talking about performance versus historical market returns, and you retort I’m resorting to emotion. Hilarious. Maybe you just don’t have the firepower to handle these debates?
And Trump, in sworn testimony in 2007, said in one instance he borrowed around $9 million against his inheritance. Let me guess, for your “you don’t know much Trump started with” from one of your half-literate chain emails?
Now I have a few minutes then taking my wife out.
So…did you find my response yet counselor?
Do you realize what your saying? Okay…no problem let’s go with your recollection of events. He borrowed 9 million and turned it into 10 billion.
And you say he’s not a good business man.
And why?
because sniff…sniff you don’t wike him. 