Go Israel Go!

[quote]Petedacook wrote:
dk44 wrote:

why can’t i believe this site? oh its corrupt right?

Probably because you are too lazy to seek out information outside major corporations.

I don’t dislike jewish people at all. I do not agree with what they are doing in Israel though.

I am too busy to argue you down. You can educate yourself or go on being ignorant. [/quote]

Explain how in the fuck you are so fucking right? You pull a website out of your ass, so did I. You choose to believe whats on that website, but if someone begs to differ they are lazy and you say oh the media corrupted it. How the fuck do you know what your reading wasn’t posted by fucking Lixy?

[quote]Petedacook wrote:
Thanks Lixy!

[/quote]

To busy to “argue me down,” but you apparently have enough time to suck a fellow terrorists dick.

You are ignorant.

Here are some UN resolutions against Israel.

I assume you know how to look them up.

1955-1992:

* Resolution 106: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for Gaza raid".

* Resolution 111: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for raid on Syria that killed fifty-six people".

* Resolution 127: " . . . ‘recommends’ Israel suspends it’s ‘no-man’s zone’ in Jerusalem".

* Resolution 162: " . . . ‘urges’ Israel to comply with UN decisions".

* Resolution 171: " . . . determines flagrant violations’ by Israel in its attack on Syria".

* Resolution 228: " . . . ‘censures’ Israel for its attack on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control".

* Resolution 237: " . . . ‘urges’ Israel to allow return of new 1967 Palestinian refugees".

* Resolution 248: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for its massive attack on Karameh in Jordan".

* Resolution 250: " . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem".

* Resolution 251: " . . . ‘deeply deplores’ Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250".

* Resolution 252: " . . . ‘declares invalid’ Israel’s acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital".

* Resolution 256: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israeli raids on Jordan as 'flagrant violation".

* Resolution 259: " . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to accept UN mission to probe occupation".

* Resolution 262: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for attack on Beirut airport".

* Resolution 265: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for air attacks for Salt in Jordan".

* Resolution 267: " . . . ‘censures’ Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem".

*Resolution 270: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for air attacks on villages in southern Lebanon".

* Resolution 271: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israel’s failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem".

* Resolution 279: " . . . ‘demands’ withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon".

* Resolution 280: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israeli’s attacks against Lebanon".

* Resolution 285: " . . . ‘demands’ immediate Israeli withdrawal form Lebanon".

* Resolution 298: " . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s changing of the status of Jerusalem".

* Resolution 313: " . . . ‘demands’ that Israel stop attacks against Lebanon".

* Resolution 316: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for repeated attacks on Lebanon".

* Resolution 317: " . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to release Arabs abducted in Lebanon".

* Resolution 332: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israel’s repeated attacks against Lebanon".

* Resolution 337: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for violating Lebanon’s sovereignty".

* Resolution 347: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israeli attacks on Lebanon".

* Resolution 425: " . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon".

* Resolution 427: " . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to complete its withdrawal from Lebanon.

* Resolution 444: " . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s lack of cooperation with UN peacekeeping forces".

* Resolution 446: " . . . ‘determines’ that Israeli settlements are a 'serious

obstruction’ to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention".

* Resolution 450: " . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to stop attacking Lebanon".

* Resolution 452: " . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories".

* Resolution 465: " . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s settlements and asks all member

states not to assist Israel’s settlements program".

* Resolution 467: " . . . ‘strongly deplores’ Israel’s military intervention in Lebanon".

* Resolution 468: " . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to rescind illegal expulsions of

two Palestinian mayors and a judge and to facilitate their return".

* Resolution 469: " . . . ‘strongly deplores’ Israel’s failure to observe the

council’s order not to deport Palestinians".

* Resolution 471: " . . . ‘expresses deep concern’ at Israel’s failure to abide

by the Fourth Geneva Convention".

* Resolution 476: " . . . ‘reiterates’ that Israel’s claim to Jerusalem are ‘null and void’".

* Resolution 478: " . . . ‘censures (Israel) in the strongest terms’ for its

claim to Jerusalem in its ‘Basic Law’".

* Resolution 484: " . . . ‘declares it imperative’ that Israel re-admit two deported

Palestinian mayors".

* Resolution 487: " . . . ‘strongly condemns’ Israel for its attack on Iraq’s

nuclear facility".

* Resolution 497: " . . . ‘decides’ that Israel’s annexation of Syria’s Golan

Heights is ‘null and void’ and demands that Israel rescinds its decision forthwith".

* Resolution 498: " . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to withdraw from Lebanon".

* Resolution 501: " . . . ‘calls’ on Israel to stop attacks against Lebanon and withdraw its troops".

* Resolution 509: " . . . ‘demands’ that Israel withdraw its forces forthwith and unconditionally from Lebanon".

* Resolution 515: " . . . ‘demands’ that Israel lift its siege of Beirut and

allow food supplies to be brought in".

* Resolution 517: " . . . ‘censures’ Israel for failing to obey UN resolutions

and demands that Israel withdraw its forces from Lebanon".

* Resolution 518: " . . . ‘demands’ that Israel cooperate fully with UN forces in Lebanon".

* Resolution 520: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israel’s attack into West Beirut".

* Resolution 573: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israel ‘vigorously’ for bombing Tunisia

in attack on PLO headquarters.

* Resolution 587: " . . . ‘takes note’ of previous calls on Israel to withdraw

its forces from Lebanon and urges all parties to withdraw".

* Resolution 592: " . . . ‘strongly deplores’ the killing of Palestinian students

at Bir Zeit University by Israeli troops".

* Resolution 605: " . . . ‘strongly deplores’ Israel’s policies and practices

denying the human rights of Palestinians.

* Resolution 607: " . . . ‘calls’ on Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly

requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention.

* Resolution 608: " . . . ‘deeply regrets’ that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians".

* Resolution 636: " . . . ‘deeply regrets’ Israeli deportation of Palestinian civilians.

* Resolution 641: " . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s continuing deportation of Palestinians.

* Resolution 672: " . . . ‘condemns’ Israel for violence against Palestinians

at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount.

* Resolution 673: " . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s refusal to cooperate with the United

Nations.

* Resolution 681: " . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s resumption of the deportation of

Palestinians.

* Resolution 694: " . . . ‘deplores’ Israel’s deportation of Palestinians and

calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return.

* Resolution 726: " . . . ‘strongly condemns’ Israel’s deportation of Palestinians.

* Resolution 799: ". . . ‘strongly condemns’ Israel’s deportation of 413 Palestinians

and calls for their immediate return.

[quote]dk44 wrote:
Petedacook wrote:
Thanks Lixy!

To busy to “argue me down,” but you apparently have enough time to suck a fellow terrorists dick. [/quote]

Classy.

This an example of maps found throughout Palestinian textbooks. You’ll notice that Israel doesn’t exist, but is instead replaced by ‘Palestine.’ That should you tell all you need to know about why Israel simply can’t withdraw at the present. Because they’d just to turn right back around and occupy the same damn ground again.

And, another.

And then finally, a report on Palestinian textbooks themselves.
http://www.pmw.org.il/BookReport_Eng.pdf

You are ignorant. Cuz we all know that the U.N. doesnt have a bias against Israel (opps, silly me, there I go believing the media hype)

There now we are back to square one. You’re wrong, no you’re wrong and my dad can beat your dad up.

Denial of Israel’s right to even exist, PA TV.
http://www.pmw.org.il/

[quote]Sloth wrote:
This an example of maps found throughout Palestinian textbooks. [/quote]

Not limited to Palestinian textbooks.

Promotion of racism and anti-semitism. Including treating the fraudulent “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” as fact.
http://www.pmw.org.il/

But nah, if only Israel would be nice. Nevermind that the Palestinians have indoctrinated their children with the same level of anti-semitic propoganda as the Nazis.

Hey, kill the Danes for offending the messenger of God! Asuud the Palestinian Jihad Rabbit says to! Oooh, great children’s program there. Nah, you’re right Pete, if only those meanies realized they’d be left in peace if they’d just withdraw.

Watch the Children’s show video.
http://www.pmw.org.il/

[quote]lixy wrote:
dk44 wrote:
Why in the fuck should I believe that site, or any site for that matter?

You don’t. That’s where, for most rational people, fact-checking and critical thinking come into play.

Instead of slamming everything Pete wrote, try pointing out to what you believe were erroneous facts in his list. We can take it from there.[/quote]

Because we have discussed it to death many, many, many times over, have we not? If he’s late to the game, well, tough shit I guess. I personally am not on a mission to convert everybody who disagrees with me. It’s his right, but he also insulted me, for no good reason, in the process. So my my ‘give a shit’ broke. If he wants to be obtuse, more power to him. As long as he knows what kind of rub to use on a particular steak, he’s cool with me.

[quote]dk44 wrote:
Petedacook wrote:
dk44 wrote:

why can’t i believe this site? oh its corrupt right?

Probably because you are too lazy to seek out information outside major corporations.

I don’t dislike jewish people at all. I do not agree with what they are doing in Israel though.

I am too busy to argue you down. You can educate yourself or go on being ignorant.

Explain how in the fuck you are so fucking right? You pull a website out of your ass, so did I. You choose to believe whats on that website, but if someone begs to differ they are lazy and you say oh the media corrupted it. How the fuck do you know what your reading wasn’t posted by fucking Lixy?[/quote]

Insults with out just cause is a sign of insecurity. He’s wrong, we know it, do you wanna trade barbs with him? That’s what it will boil down to. “I am right and if you don’t agree you’re fucking idiot!” is inflammatory, but not a good argument.

Petedacook, you’re good at throwing facts out there. Anyone can do that for both sides of the issue.

So, Israelis are killing Palestinians, Palestinians are killing Israelis.

What the hell should we do about it?

(And where’s my stats?)

What laws were broken when Israel took back Israel?

Use of the term “illegally occupying” is the tell-tale sign of one who is making shit up at the beginning to support his hatred of a given nation.

Israel has as much right to exist as anyone else in the ME.

They also can be overthrown and pushed out into the sea. Why has this not happened yet?

Shove your bitching up your jew-hating ass and admit that all the jew-haters in the ME are also some of the biggest pussies on the planet.

None of the ihatejews.org websites are going to change the fact Israel is not going anywhere anytime soon. I don’t care how many Palestinians get killed. They would probably all still be alive if they would leave Israel the fuck alone. Or - and this is even more telling of just how much of a pussy they are - quit using women and children as fucking shields.

[quote]Sloth wrote:
Hey, kill the Danes for offending the messenger of God! Asuud the Palestinian Jihad Rabbit says to! Oooh, great children’s program there. Nah, you’re right Pete, if only those meanies realized they’d be left in peace if they’d just withdraw.

Watch the Children’s show video.
http://www.pmw.org.il/

[/quote]

I don’t recall stating any actions of the Muslim community are acceptable. They are wrong in many ways.

I never understood why they get so offended over a stupid cartoon drawing.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
What laws were broken when Israel took back Israel?

[/quote]

The Geneva Conventions and other international tractates recognize that land a) conquered in the course of a war; and b) the disposition of which is unresolved through subsequent peace treaties is “occupied” and subject to international laws of war and international humanitarian law. This includes special protection of individuals in those territories, limitations on the use of land in those territories, and access by international relief agencies.

*The West Bank and Gaza are “occupied,” because:

* They were captured by force of arms and against the will of their populations.
* The residents in these areas were stateless.
* Israel has put the territories under military rather than civilian administration, creating a de facto state of occupation. 
  • Non-Jewish residents who reject Israeli citizenship and/or hegemony have the right to self-determination.

UN resolution 242 calls for Israel to withdraw and states it is an illegal occupation.

I have nothing against Jewish people.

[quote]Gkhan wrote:
Petedacook, you’re good at throwing facts out there. Anyone can do that for both sides of the issue.

So, Israelis are killing Palestinians, Palestinians are killing Israelis.

What the hell should we do about it?

(And where’s my stats?)[/quote]

I don’t know what should be done about it. It is very disheartening. I think a step in the right direction would be to report fairly and equally on the issue.