[quote]BrickHead wrote:
Orion: Do you have a woman in your life?[/quote]
I have two.
What did I win?
Wait, how do you count that?
[quote]Chushin wrote:
[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
[quote]debraD wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]debraD wrote:
Yeah your point was clear the first time. But is still a dumb one to make.
[/quote]
In all fairness, this is the internet and this is Get a Life where making dumb points is practically a competition.
Edit: See one post up.[/quote]
True, but it depends on how serious you are taking yourself when making these dumb posts whether you laugh or say wtf are you on about??
[/quote]
It’s the solipsism that makes you think that way, though, Deb. Bless your goofy little heart, you don’t even feel any cognitive dissonance over it![/quote]
Lol.
You’re pretty good at that. :-)[/quote]
Well yes, she seems to have understood, at least intellectually, female sollipsism.
And of course she does not, if it does not feel right it cannot be, even if it objectively is.
One and a half?
Ha…on the main page it says Girl Attempts To Sleep Wityh 10 so I assumed it was “10 men” and I thought “Quite a floozy!”
Kids these days!
I would be pissed if I was her boyfriend, when is she going to find time to do the laundry and cook him a damn steak?
[quote]lagaprop wrote:
I would be pissed if I was her boyfriend, when is she going to find time to do the laundry and cook him a damn steak?[/quote]
Who says she will neglect those responsibilities, he’s going to travel along, and shes just going to lie belly down on a wheeled gurney with a procession of lonely naked men behind her as she cooks dinner and such. Judging by her appearance, that might be preferable. Maybe put one of those cones around her neck that vets use to keep dogs from scratching themselves.
He’s gonna take her to meet his folks for sure.
I hope she makes it to the states!
EDIT: I just did a google image search. I retract my previous statement
[quote]ChongLordUno wrote:
Imagine having sex with her is like opening a window and shagging the night!
[/quote]
Not necessarily. I think looseness could be more a matter of the size of your biggest partner rather than how many partners.
Surely a woman who relaxes to fuck 1 penis of 6 inches girth would be looser than a woman who clenches down to try and feel 100 000 penises of 4 inches girth.
[quote]tyciol wrote:
[quote]ChongLordUno wrote:
Imagine having sex with her is like opening a window and shagging the night!
[/quote]
Not necessarily. I think looseness could be more a matter of the size of your biggest partner rather than how many partners.
Surely a woman who relaxes to fuck 1 penis of 6 inches girth would be looser than a woman who clenches down to try and feel 100 000 penises of 4 inches girth.[/quote]
LOL neither of those is correct. The vagina accommodates the size of what it is using at the time (for lack of a better description) and then reverts to regular shape. Think of your wives. Did they get stretched out after years of sex? no. that’s not how a vagina works.
[quote]tyciol wrote:
[quote]ChongLordUno wrote:
Imagine having sex with her is like opening a window and shagging the night!
[/quote]
Not necessarily. I think looseness could be more a matter of the size of your biggest partner rather than how many partners.
Surely a woman who relaxes to fuck 1 penis of 6 inches girth would be looser than a woman who clenches down to try and feel 100 000 penises of 4 inches girth.[/quote]
No, Sandos is right. I’ve used some really giant objects on my wife and the next day she felt exactly the same as before. The only thing that has ever made a difference that lasted a significant amount of time was having a baby. Six months later though, and she was back to normal. Women just have their size and it’s not going to change very much.
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
And I will bet any amount of money that Genghis Khan had sex with 100,000 women in his long and illustrious career. Knocked up a goodly number of them on multiple continents, too: DNA does not lie. Of course, most of his “partners” were likely screaming and trying to escape throughout their “lovemaking”, but hey, it still counts. [/quote]
Eh maybe. This is a bit of an illusion though. Mathematically if you just started adding up everyone’s ancestors you very quickly end up with more people than have ever been lol. The reality of course is if you go back far enough, pretty much everyone alive today is in some way related to anyone of similar race in that time period who had a decent number of offspring.
[quote]sandos wrote:neither of those is correct. The vagina accommodates the size of what it is using at the time (for lack of a better description) and then reverts to regular shape. Think of your wives. Did they get stretched out after years of sex? no. that’s not how a vagina works.
[/quote]
The truth is somewhere in the middle. Being elastic and able to revert to a previous shape doesn’t mean you can’t be deformed. Skin is elastic, but obviously it doesn’t immediately snap back if you lose weight, especially if done quickly like a liposuction. You can overstretch a rubber band and it can snap, or sometimes if you overstretch some bands they just don’t return to their original length. They can lose resistance over long-term use. This is less so with biological structures due to self-repair capacity, but still happens.
Using a “think of your wife” analogy is misleading, because obviously if she’s fucking the same cock it’s going to fit rather snugly around it. I’m talking about a massive difference in girth though. Stretching to 5 can keep you feeling snug for 5, but it won’t keep you feeling so snug as a 6 if she’s doing 8s. Especially as they age and skin loses its elasticity, and if they aren’t the type to practice kegals and maintain muscle tensing ability for gripping.
If a woman fucks HUGE cock, she’ll probably rely passively on her non-muscle soft tissues (I want to say ‘fascia’ but I’m no anatomy expert) for tightness while focusing on relaxing her muscles to accomodate a large partner. By those being stretched by big ones, she’ll lose passive tension, and lose the habit of generating active tension.
[quote]on edge wrote:
I’ve used some really giant objects on my wife and the next day she felt exactly the same as before. The only thing that has ever made a difference that lasted a significant amount of time was having a baby. Six months later though, and she was back to normal. Women just have their size and it’s not going to change very much.[/quote]
I’m not saying women can’t bounce back, just that it’s situational. Like you said with the baby, there was a recovery period. How much it changes depend on how much (and probably also how regularly) it gets deformed.
Babies, dildos and fisting are probably more of a threat to tightness than even the most girthiest meatsticks though, so thoughts related to that are probably less of a priority than most think them to be.
[quote]debraD wrote:
Both are equally fucked in the head and devoid of virtue.[/quote]
Virtue’s kind of a subjective issue here, everyone has different ideas of what they consider virtues or vices. Whether or not fucking makes you fucked in the head is more about the quality of partner than the quantity. I do get that with large quantity we tend to assume people are choosing lower-quality mates though. It’s probably true, but I worry we focus so much on shaming people over number that we ignore people who have low numbers but equally low (or even lower) quantity.
Surely a woman who bangs a thousand 6s isn’t as bad as a woman who bangs a single 5. I’m not talking in terms of looks, btw, just whatever means by which we measure quality.
We could say something about the quality of relationship, but it’s the same thing. Being monoamorous is no guarantee people have a good relationship with their partner. Casual partners may not be thoroughly involved or open but they could still coexist on good terms.
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
This ought to put it all in perspective, as well as highlight (as if it were necessary) the egregious double standard. If it were a guy whose quest it was to bang a hundred thousand bitches around the world, half of us might doubt he could do it, and the other half would be like, rock on, dude. And if he managed to accomplish even ten or twenty percent of his stated goal, he would be a god in your eyes. Deny it if you like, hypocrites. You might hate him, but it would be envy talking.
Anyway, here are the top ten Casanovas and Don Juans of our time, with a conservative estimate of their conquests. Love them or hate them, they have gotten more pussy than you will in ten lifetimes.
10: Jack Nicholson-- 2,000
9. Hugh Hefner-- 2,000 - 5,000
8. Julio Iglesias-- 3,000
7. Ron Jeremy-- 4,000 - 5,000
6. Gene Simmons-- 4,600
5. Charlie Sheen-- 5,000
4. Umberto Billo-- 8,000
3. Warren Beatty-- 12,000
2. Wilt Chamberlin-- 20,000
And finally, the king of quim, the pasha of punani, the ayatollah of wet-pink-hole-a…is…
- Fidel motherfucking Castro-- Thirty-five thousand women.
Which only goes to show you that Kissinger was right: ain’t no aphrodisiac quite like power. [/quote]
There is no double standard.
Any semi attractive women can have sex 24/7.
For a man to achieve the same he apparently has to highjack a small Caribean nation.
[/quote]
While I partially agree I think a semi attractive guy could do better if he realized he isn’t that attractive and is only mediocre and went for mediocre or low mediocre women. Ie sticking to his level or below. I don’t think a semi attractive woman will be landing guys to far out of here league on the regular. But probably has a better shot than a semi attractive dude landing a woman out of his league [/quote]
Ok, even before getting laid I knew women had it way easier than any man on Earth. Your 90 year old granny has a guarantee fuck at the end of a night if she went out on a friday/saturday. Your 90 year old grandpa will be locked up.
Never underestimate the lengths and depths men will go to to get a nut off in someone/something.
[quote]spar4tee wrote:
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
And I will bet any amount of money that Genghis Khan had sex with 100,000 women in his long and illustrious career. Knocked up a goodly number of them on multiple continents, too: DNA does not lie. Of course, most of his “partners” were likely screaming and trying to escape throughout their “lovemaking”, but hey, it still counts. [/quote]
I’m 99.99% sure I carry his seed.[/quote]
Have an unusual fondness for small hats, ponies, and BBQ?
[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:
[quote]spar4tee wrote:
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
And I will bet any amount of money that Genghis Khan had sex with 100,000 women in his long and illustrious career. Knocked up a goodly number of them on multiple continents, too: DNA does not lie. Of course, most of his “partners” were likely screaming and trying to escape throughout their “lovemaking”, but hey, it still counts. [/quote]
I’m 99.99% sure I carry his seed.[/quote]
Have an unusual fondness for small hats, ponies, and BBQ?[/quote]
I can’t say I do.
Good for her.
More college aged girls should have big long goals shoved down their throats.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Good for her.
More college aged girls should have big long goals shoved down their throats.[/quote]
If they’re not crying, they’re not trying.
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
And I will bet any amount of money that Genghis Khan had sex with 100,000 women in his long and illustrious career. Knocked up a goodly number of them on multiple continents, too: DNA does not lie. Of course, most of his “partners” were likely screaming and trying to escape throughout their “lovemaking”, but hey, it still counts. [/quote]
To hit 100,000 Genghis would have had to make love to 4 different women every day for 70 years.[/quote]
And he supposedly only lived to be 65. Assuming he didn’t start sexual activity until age 12, that gives him 53 years of solid fucking. 100,000/(365*53) = an average of ~5 new sexual partners/day. If he only slept of 6 hours a night, that means he was running through a new chick every 3.6 hours. Not a lot of time for much else unless he was a 2 pump chump.
[quote]waldo21212 wrote:
[quote]on edge wrote:
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
And I will bet any amount of money that Genghis Khan had sex with 100,000 women in his long and illustrious career. Knocked up a goodly number of them on multiple continents, too: DNA does not lie. Of course, most of his “partners” were likely screaming and trying to escape throughout their “lovemaking”, but hey, it still counts. [/quote]
To hit 100,000 Genghis would have had to make love to 4 different women every day for 70 years.[/quote]
And he supposedly only lived to be 65. Assuming he didn’t start sexual activity until age 12, that gives him 53 years of solid fucking. 100,000/(365*53) = an average of ~5 new sexual partners/day. If he only slept of 6 hours a night, that means he was running through a new chick every 3.6 hours. Not a lot of time for much else unless he was a 2 pump chump.
[/quote]
…he was using cabergoline