Getting A Date From Drivethru Chick: Impossible?

Off Topic
161

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]tsantos wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
Still no pics.[/quote]

Hold your horses. Have a little patience. I’m not going to take pictures of her on the first or second date. Besides, you doubt the machine? This thread was intended as part one anyway. There’s this strumpet at the fragrances department at David Jones…she’s a ten and she knows it.[/quote]

So… you’ll sleep with strumpets, sluts and tramps, but not whores.

Ah well, a man’s got to have standards, I guess.[/quote]

I’d sleep with a hooker probably if she was a 8.5-10 and wasn’t a junkie or something(that’s kind of why I’m skeptical. But sleeping with a hooker is not the same thing as picking up anyway. Sleeping with a hooker isn’t going to do anything for your ego for starters is it? And I like to service the lady; not the other way around. I’d sleep with a hooker if she was hot, not a junkie, no STDs and so on but it still wouldn’t be the same would it?
[/quote]

Dunno. Is there a qualitative difference, ego-wise, between sleeping with a woman who’ll sleep with anyone, and sleeping with a woman who’ll sleep with anyone for money?

And who is to say that “strumpets” are any less likely to have an STD or an drug problem than are prostitutes? The act of accepting cash for sex does not make one more susceptible to disease or addiction.

You can “service” a prostitute if you want to. She won’t mind. She might even enjoy it. She’s still a woman, after all. And besides, it’s your money, you can do whatever the fuck you want with the time you paid for.
[/quote]

This reply is, so far, the highlight in a fairly disappointing thread. Pick up your game SM, there’s potential here.
[/quote]

Sorry to disappoint you there. But there’s nearly 7000 views and 150+ replies so obviously the thread must’ve generated some interest.[/quote]

Never mistake interest for quality. Laughing with you and laughing at you are two very different reactions.

jnd

162

That sounds kinda personal jnd. You one of those guys offended by my right-wingery or something?

163

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
I meant strumpet in the sense that Shakespeare used it; a bold, disobedient, naughty woman. The kind that needs a spanking and a good seeing to.
[/quote]

Othello: Impudent strumpet!
Desdemona: By heaven, you do me wrong.
Othello: Are you not a strumpet?
Desdemona: No, as I am a Christian: If to preserve this vessel for my lord from any other foul unlawful touch be not to be a strumpet, I am none.
Othello: What, not a whore?

Shakespeare often used the word as we would use the word “bitch” or “slut” today, but he did also use it in its original sense, to mean what Othello accuses his wife of being: a whore and an adulteress.

164

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
That sounds kinda personal jnd. You one of those guys offended by my right-wingery or something? [/quote]

It’s not the right-wingery. It’s the intense douchery.

jnd

165

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
I meant strumpet in the sense that Shakespeare used it; a bold, disobedient, naughty woman. The kind that needs a spanking and a good seeing to.
[/quote]

Othello: Impudent strumpet!
Desdemona: By heaven, you do me wrong.
Othello: Are you not a strumpet?
Desdemona: No, as I am a Christian: If to preserve this vessel for my lord from any other foul unlawful touch be not to be a strumpet, I am none.
Othello: What, not a whore?

Shakespeare often used the word as we would use the word “bitch” or “slut” today, but he did also use it in its original sense, to mean what Othello accuses his wife of being: a whore and an adulteress.[/quote]

Okay smart guy, I meant it in the sense that I used it. She’s bold and needs a good seeing to.

166

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
I meant strumpet in the sense that Shakespeare used it; a bold, disobedient, naughty woman. The kind that needs a spanking and a good seeing to.
[/quote]

Othello: Impudent strumpet!
Desdemona: By heaven, you do me wrong.
Othello: Are you not a strumpet?
Desdemona: No, as I am a Christian: If to preserve this vessel for my lord from any other foul unlawful touch be not to be a strumpet, I am none.
Othello: What, not a whore?

Shakespeare often used the word as we would use the word “bitch” or “slut” today, but he did also use it in its original sense, to mean what Othello accuses his wife of being: a whore and an adulteress.[/quote]

Okay smart guy, I meant it in the sense that I used it. She’s bold and needs a good seeing to.
[/quote]

Haha. Fair enough.

“She” now being the fragrances girl? You have interacted with her sufficiently to ascertain her boldness and needing to be seen to?

167

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
Still no pics.[/quote]

Hold your horses. Have a little patience. I’m not going to take pictures of her on the first or second date. Besides, you doubt the machine? This thread was intended as part one anyway. There’s this strumpet at the fragrances department at David Jones…she’s a ten and she knows it.[/quote]

So… you’ll sleep with strumpets, sluts and tramps, but not whores.

Ah well, a man’s got to have standards, I guess.[/quote]

I’d sleep with a hooker probably if she was a 8.5-10 and wasn’t a junkie or something(that’s kind of why I’m skeptical. But sleeping with a hooker is not the same thing as picking up anyway. Sleeping with a hooker isn’t going to do anything for your ego for starters is it? And I like to service the lady; not the other way around. I’d sleep with a hooker if she was hot, not a junkie, no STDs and so on but it still wouldn’t be the same would it?
[/quote]

Dunno. Is there a qualitative difference, ego-wise, between sleeping with a woman who’ll sleep with anyone, and sleeping with a woman who’ll sleep with anyone for money?
[/quote]

Yes - The latter has standards

168

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:
I meant strumpet in the sense that Shakespeare used it; a bold, disobedient, naughty woman. The kind that needs a spanking and a good seeing to.
[/quote]

Othello: Impudent strumpet!
Desdemona: By heaven, you do me wrong.
Othello: Are you not a strumpet?
Desdemona: No, as I am a Christian: If to preserve this vessel for my lord from any other foul unlawful touch be not to be a strumpet, I am none.
Othello: What, not a whore?

Shakespeare often used the word as we would use the word “bitch” or “slut” today, but he did also use it in its original sense, to mean what Othello accuses his wife of being: a whore and an adulteress.[/quote]

Okay smart guy, I meant it in the sense that I used it. She’s bold and needs a good seeing to.
[/quote]

Haha. Fair enough.

“She” now being the fragrances girl? You have interacted with her sufficiently to ascertain her boldness and needing to be seen to?[/quote]

Copulative stare dude. She needs a good seeing to.

169

[quote]polo77j wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
Still no pics.[/quote]

Hold your horses. Have a little patience. I’m not going to take pictures of her on the first or second date. Besides, you doubt the machine? This thread was intended as part one anyway. There’s this strumpet at the fragrances department at David Jones…she’s a ten and she knows it.[/quote]

So… you’ll sleep with strumpets, sluts and tramps, but not whores.

Ah well, a man’s got to have standards, I guess.[/quote]

I’d sleep with a hooker probably if she was a 8.5-10 and wasn’t a junkie or something(that’s kind of why I’m skeptical. But sleeping with a hooker is not the same thing as picking up anyway. Sleeping with a hooker isn’t going to do anything for your ego for starters is it? And I like to service the lady; not the other way around. I’d sleep with a hooker if she was hot, not a junkie, no STDs and so on but it still wouldn’t be the same would it?
[/quote]

Dunno. Is there a qualitative difference, ego-wise, between sleeping with a woman who’ll sleep with anyone, and sleeping with a woman who’ll sleep with anyone for money?
[/quote]

Yes - The latter has standards
[/quote]

Just what I was thinking.

Not to mention a sense of self-worth.

170

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]polo77j wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
Still no pics.[/quote]

Hold your horses. Have a little patience. I’m not going to take pictures of her on the first or second date. Besides, you doubt the machine? This thread was intended as part one anyway. There’s this strumpet at the fragrances department at David Jones…she’s a ten and she knows it.[/quote]

So… you’ll sleep with strumpets, sluts and tramps, but not whores.

Ah well, a man’s got to have standards, I guess.[/quote]

I’d sleep with a hooker probably if she was a 8.5-10 and wasn’t a junkie or something(that’s kind of why I’m skeptical. But sleeping with a hooker is not the same thing as picking up anyway. Sleeping with a hooker isn’t going to do anything for your ego for starters is it? And I like to service the lady; not the other way around. I’d sleep with a hooker if she was hot, not a junkie, no STDs and so on but it still wouldn’t be the same would it?
[/quote]

Dunno. Is there a qualitative difference, ego-wise, between sleeping with a woman who’ll sleep with anyone, and sleeping with a woman who’ll sleep with anyone for money?
[/quote]

Yes - The latter has standards
[/quote]

Just what I was thinking.

Not to mention a sense of self-worth.[/quote]

in fact, her self-worth is explicitly set at a specific price (I’m sure open to negotiation - I’m not sure, I’ve never had an economic interaction with a pro)

171

[quote]polo77j wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]polo77j wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
Still no pics.[/quote]

Hold your horses. Have a little patience. I’m not going to take pictures of her on the first or second date. Besides, you doubt the machine? This thread was intended as part one anyway. There’s this strumpet at the fragrances department at David Jones…she’s a ten and she knows it.[/quote]

So… you’ll sleep with strumpets, sluts and tramps, but not whores.

Ah well, a man’s got to have standards, I guess.[/quote]

I’d sleep with a hooker probably if she was a 8.5-10 and wasn’t a junkie or something(that’s kind of why I’m skeptical. But sleeping with a hooker is not the same thing as picking up anyway. Sleeping with a hooker isn’t going to do anything for your ego for starters is it? And I like to service the lady; not the other way around. I’d sleep with a hooker if she was hot, not a junkie, no STDs and so on but it still wouldn’t be the same would it?
[/quote]

Dunno. Is there a qualitative difference, ego-wise, between sleeping with a woman who’ll sleep with anyone, and sleeping with a woman who’ll sleep with anyone for money?
[/quote]

Yes - The latter has standards
[/quote]

Just what I was thinking.

Not to mention a sense of self-worth.[/quote]

in fact, her self-worth is explicitly set at a specific price (I’m sure open to negotiation - I’m not sure, I’ve never had an economic interaction with a pro)[/quote]

Sure you have, just the medium of exchange hasn’t always been cash, nor the terms of the arrangement as clearly defined.

172

Any chance of pics of fragrance girl WITH drivethru girl?

173

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]polo77j wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]polo77j wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]SexMachine wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:
Still no pics.[/quote]

Hold your horses. Have a little patience. I’m not going to take pictures of her on the first or second date. Besides, you doubt the machine? This thread was intended as part one anyway. There’s this strumpet at the fragrances department at David Jones…she’s a ten and she knows it.[/quote]

So… you’ll sleep with strumpets, sluts and tramps, but not whores.

Ah well, a man’s got to have standards, I guess.[/quote]

I’d sleep with a hooker probably if she was a 8.5-10 and wasn’t a junkie or something(that’s kind of why I’m skeptical. But sleeping with a hooker is not the same thing as picking up anyway. Sleeping with a hooker isn’t going to do anything for your ego for starters is it? And I like to service the lady; not the other way around. I’d sleep with a hooker if she was hot, not a junkie, no STDs and so on but it still wouldn’t be the same would it?
[/quote]

Dunno. Is there a qualitative difference, ego-wise, between sleeping with a woman who’ll sleep with anyone, and sleeping with a woman who’ll sleep with anyone for money?
[/quote]

Yes - The latter has standards
[/quote]

Just what I was thinking.

Not to mention a sense of self-worth.[/quote]

in fact, her self-worth is explicitly set at a specific price (I’m sure open to negotiation - I’m not sure, I’ve never had an economic interaction with a pro)[/quote]

Sure you have, just the medium of exchange hasn’t always been cash, nor the terms of the arrangement as clearly defined.[/quote]

Time, money, attention, committment, as a man, you pay.

You can pick the currency though.

180

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:
Any chance of pics of fragrance girl WITH drivethru girl?[/quote]

Oh baby, now we’re cooking with gas.

And giving a gobby to Ronald McDonald would be icing on the cake.[/quote]

Holy shit that’s an idea! I’m a pretty devious and manipulative bastard when I want to be so I will actually consider this.